Posted on 11/02/2008 12:57:55 AM PDT by buccaneer81
For John McCain, the elephant in the room is still George W. Bush Peter Gelzinis Sunday, November 2, 2008 - In their final debate, John McCain glared at Barack Obama and said that if he was so eager to take on George W. Bush, he should have run four years ago.
When the political coroners perform their autopsies of the 2008 campaign, they may conclude that McCains best zinger was actually his most poignant epitaph. For the very question he put before Obama is the one history will ask of this old soldier:
Why didnt McCain challenge George Bush four years ago?
For a self-proclaimed maverick who saw the Iraq war rapidly descending into chaos four years ago under Donald Rumsfeld, why didnt McCain challenge the prevailing network of old-boy Washington insiders in spectacular fashion?
Sure, he wouldve been forced to wage a third-party insurgency. And yes, it might have put John Kerry in the White House. But John McCain would certainly have become a maverick for all seasons, not to mention all political persuasions. And there would have been no talk about a George W. McCain.
Gramps McCain has been living off the 8-year-old memory of a straight-talking guy who saw his first presidential fling savaged by Karl Rove and friends in South Carolina. But the truth is, when Bushs thugs flattened the tires on the Straight Talk Express back in 2000, all the air went out of McCains maverick spirit.
Hes been playing it safe ever since. Sarah Palin wasnt a bold move. She was a bon bon to the same inbred Republican base McCain had the audacity to defy eight years earlier.
Its true, Joe Lieberman never would have looked so good in a skirt and high heels. But he could have made the maverick argument with a helluva lot more conviction, eloquence and gravitas than Caribou Barbie. Ah, but then the likes of El Rushbo and Sean Hannity wouldve declared a fatwah on a McCain-Lieberman ticket.
So, as the end nears, McCain is stuck with yet another of Sarahs stupefying ad-libs. Seems she thinks that the mainstream medias description of her negative rants about Obama constitute, in her pretty mind, a threat on the First Amendment. Somewhere, professor Irwin Corey is wetting his pants laughing.
Recent leaks out of the McCain-Palin camp call to mind a famous lyric from a Cole Porter song about the love affair that was too hot not to cool down. Seems the bloom is off the rose and the only thing Palin is campaigning for at the moment is herself in 2012. And those looking to sabotage her are agents of that other pretty-but-failed candidate, Mitt Romney.
We will never know how much better, or worse, John McCain might have fared had he challenged George Bush four years ago.
But one thing is for sure: It would have been impossible for Barack Obama to tie the anchor of George Bush around John McCains neck as hes done for the last two years.
Isn't that charming?
Soros. Hate. Division.
NEWS CHIEF.com - Local Guest Column - Opinion: "OBAMA PUTTING TRUTH UNDER WRAPS" by Travers Chandler (COLUMN SNIPPET: "Unfortunately, the Obama campaign and its accompanying policies are like receiving a beautifully wrapped gift box, shiny and extravagant on the outside, yet when opened reveals only a scurrying cockroach among the tissue paper.") (Updated October 30, 2008, 9:12 a.m.)
NEWSMAX.com: "EXPECT FEWER LIBERTIES IF OBAMA WINS" by David Limbaugh (COMMENTARY SNIPPET: "I am sincerely worried that if Obama wins, the checks and balances incorporated into our Constitution may not be enough to prevent a radical and irreversible diminution of our individual liberties because a confluence of factors has emerged to create a climate conducive to fundamental change. These are the factors:") (October 28, 2008, 8:40 am)
John McCain = not George Bush
The One? Even he isn't Bush.
Sarah? Doesn't look like President Bush to me...
Further Clue for the Clueless?
Why didnt McCain challenge George Bush four years ago?
Because that's not how the game works? F'n brainless liberals. History wouldn't be stupid enough to ask the question, unless it was a liberal historian of course.
No wonder O’Reilly HATES this turd! I do too!
Gramps?
"She's" a bon bon?
And "inbred?".
Okay...I'm pissed!
I voted for McCain.
I do not like McCain.
I love Saracuda.
NOw McCain thinks he got screwed in 2000 by G.W. Bush. He did whatever he could to go against President Bush over the years to tweak the president.
It would be quite ironic if a very unpopular G.W. Bush drug down votes for Republicans and caused McCain to lose this one too.
Yet another member of the Mitt Romney("Attack Gov.Palin") fan club.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.