[Perdogg]

Where is it???

[mnehring]

http://electronicintifada.net/

What was the date of the meeting?

[bailmeout]

Then why did he share it in the first place? Something smells.

[Poison Pill]

required it not be released as a condition of sharing it.

Huh?

[JudyinCanada]

McCain needs to call upon the not-so-great one to give the green light to the la times to release the tapes, proving to the adoring masses that he has nothing to hide.

[sageb1]

It's possible. It could also be that someone on this list was there. The media has that inclusion thing going for them now.

[GOPJ]

I wouldn’t want to be him!

[Paine in the Neck]

If I understand Schlussel correctly, she claims that Wallsten, the guy who wrote the LA Times article about the tape, never saw the tape but just re-wrote Schlussel's article. Thus, the Times is holding out not to protect Obama or a source but to protect Wallsten who Schlussel says plaigerized her article.

[SunkenCiv]

LA Times Free The Tape Protest - “Shame On You” [VIDEO]
YouTube | 10/30/08 | photonh2o
Posted on 10/30/2008 1:29:40 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2120007/posts

[midwyf]

Now of course if it were battle plans designed to catch Osama bin Laden, they would put them under headline banners on the front page.

[Kimberly GG]

Im confused. The Times ‘obtains’ it from a ‘confidential’ source and then refuses to show it.

If the ‘confidential’ source made keeping the tape confidential as a condition for turning it over to the Times, what did the Times have to gain by spending the money to purchase it?

If they did not ‘purchase’ it from the source, what did the source gain in ‘giving’ it to the Times?

Oh well, maybe it’s just me, but something seems out of wack.

[floriduh voter]

bttt and ping.

[nutmeg]

ping!

Thanks for the heads up, floriduh voter.