An extremely comprehensive timeline for Obama

http://colony14.net/id41.html ^

[mimi from mi]

This article presents the relevant aspects of Barack Obama’s life, from birth to the present. It is a very long read, but goes right up to October 24, 2008. If you're looking for a particular quote from Obama, you can probably find it here.

http://colony14.net/id41.html

[Brian S. Fitzgerald]

http://colony14.net/id41.html

The Obama Timeline: 1961-2008

The following is an attempt to present the relevant aspects of Barack Obama’s life, from birth to the present. Every attempt has been made to present accurate names, information, and dates. If errors or significant omissions are noted, please free to contact the author at colony14@gmail.com. Please keep in mind, however, that it is incredibly difficult to pin down the Obama campaign on specifics regarding the candidate’s past. His staffers have released very little documentation, and requests for clarification go unanswered, or are answered in different ways by different staffers.

[tarpit]

“The 1961 birth certificate posted on the Internet by the Obama campaign is suspected of being a forgery, based on a modified copy of his half-sister Maya’s birth certificate.”

The computer generated short form COLB may/not be a forgery. The signature stamp of Mr. Onaka is interesting because Mr. Onaka appears to have graduated in 1965 and was hired sometime in the late 1980s.

Berg’s challenge has hit the issue of standing, which is consistent with that faced in Robinson v Secretary of State Debra Brown et al, on the premise “Senator John McCain, this action alleges, is not a “natural-born citizen” within the meaning of Article II of the Constitution of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve
as president.”

In that ruling, it was found:
It is clear that mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and that the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify. Issues regarding qualifications for president are quintessentially suited to the foregoing process. Arguments concerning qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress.
The members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are well qualified to adjudicate any objections to ballots for allegedly unqualified candidates. Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review — if any — should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course. Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300–02 (1998). This circumstance also obviates any occasion to consider plaintiff’s standing-cure suggestion that the American Independent Party (affiliated with Alan Keyes) be allowed to intervene.