Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brothers share wife to secure family land
CNN ^ | 10/24/2008 | Sara Sidner

Posted on 10/24/2008 5:48:04 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: dljordan

Looks like about 100 vertical feet for every 10 horizontal feet to farm. UGH!


21 posted on 10/24/2008 6:09:44 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Wow


22 posted on 10/24/2008 6:11:05 AM PDT by nuconvert (Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists// Rove>>Biden is a Big,Blowhard Dufus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gondring; Natchez Hawk
I was reading recently about gynecide (the selective killing of unborn and newborn female infants) in China and India. One consequence is this scarcity of females. creating intense marital rivalry. In some places, females in cities are being abducted and shipped to remote places to be shared wives of brothers, and other threesome arrangements.

Note that they all agreed that they needed children.

The poorer you are in a rural society, the less you can afford NOT having children. The children will be making some small economic contribution as early as age 4 (picking up sticks for firewood, picking bugs off the bean plants, keeping an eye on 8 month old brother); they may be actually pulling their own weight in terms of economic contribution by the time they're 8 or 9; after that, it's all increased productivity for ther benefit of the whole family.

23 posted on 10/24/2008 6:15:28 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle." - Philo of Alexandria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Varda

This system will probably exist in China in another generation—what with the one child policy and such a high rate of either aborting female children, killing them after birth, or sending them off to be adopted elsewhere. There is already an abundance of boys—when they become men they will have to share their wives.


24 posted on 10/24/2008 6:26:29 AM PDT by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Half a wife? I don’t see the down side to this........ "

TWO husbands? I definitely see a down side to this!!!!!!!

25 posted on 10/24/2008 6:30:04 AM PDT by LakeLady (I am a Female Alpha Dog Activist!! I hunt & tree demonRATS! THEN I bite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LakeLady

But maybe an UPside as well?


26 posted on 10/24/2008 6:36:23 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Burkean
There is already an abundance of boys—when they become men they will have to share their wives.

Or be killed off in a carefully planned war...

27 posted on 10/24/2008 6:37:21 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Burkean

That’s a great solution to too many boys. Way better than starting a war.


28 posted on 10/24/2008 6:41:18 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LakeLady
TWO husbands? I definitely see a down side to this!!!!!!!

Agreed!

29 posted on 10/24/2008 6:42:08 AM PDT by Heartland Mom (Those who would give up liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Or dying in a completely unplanned war or guerilla/terrorist struggles. China isn’t just a country folks; it’s an empire. Lots of ethnic groups concentrated in particular areas that are not altogether happy about it.


30 posted on 10/24/2008 6:53:32 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: metesky
With my luck, I’d get the half that eats

LOL
31 posted on 10/24/2008 7:01:03 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I’ve always said that we could eliminate the most backwards societies on this planet if we developed a “practically guaranteed male child” pill to sell on the black market in the Third World. Most muzzie cultures would breed themselves out of existance within two or three generations.


32 posted on 10/24/2008 7:28:33 AM PDT by hunter112 (Gov. Palin is ten times the woman Hillary could've hoped to be, if she had stayed a "Goldwater Girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

I suggest you would not like the side effects.

Right now, in both India and China, the combination of ultrasound and easy abortion is creating a ballooning demographic imbalance. Estimates of 30M unemployable males with no possibility of marriage, is growing faster than predicted, and 50M or more may be more accurate.

However, the threat of that many “excess” males is genuine. On their own, they will invariably destabilize their nations. Organized, they can turn into immense armies overnight.

This is especially dangerous in China, where a charismatic leader caused the Taiping rebellion, perhaps the second bloodiest conflict in human history after WWII, and which lasted from 1850 to 1864. Some of the battlefields of the rebellion were said to have so many dead that “over a five square mile area, you could not set foot on ground.”

It is little studied in the US, both because it ran concurrently with the US Civil War, but also because American missionaries were very indirectly responsible for inspiring the charismatic madman, who fancied himself the “younger brother of Jesus” after reading a missionary pamphlet.

It has been proposed that, for the first time, India and China might be compelled into a “demographic war”, a World War One-type battlefield whose primary purpose is to kill off excess men, armed with only rifles, grenades and artillery, and fighting over desolate, high mountain ranges in extremely cold weather.

The professional armies of both nations would remain in reserve, just in case an unanticipated breakthrough happened. Otherwise, the intent would be bloody stalemate. A tacit agreement between the two sides would be that the war would remain conventional, and that no important territorial changes would occur.

Fed only a ball of rice a day, and armed only with a rifle and artillery, which is responsible for most battlefield casualties, the war would continue until enough excess males had been eliminated on both sides.


33 posted on 10/24/2008 2:30:44 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
As for the side effects: How are they going to get here, by swimming? Any troop transport could be blown out of the water a few hundred miles from our shores.

Yes, there may be armies of single men fighting similar armies from neighboring or nearby countries. It just eliminates them faster, that's all. Armies are not a threat to a nation that has sophisticated weaponry, they are only a threat to a similarly underpowered country within close proximity.

34 posted on 10/24/2008 9:27:18 PM PDT by hunter112 (Gov. Palin is ten times the woman Hillary could've hoped to be, if she had stayed a "Goldwater Girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson