Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Whittle: What Is a Right and How Do We Know?
National Review Online ^ | October 09, 2008 | Bill Whittle

Posted on 10/09/2008 2:43:14 PM PDT by neverdem








What Is a Right and How Do We Know?
Wherein we take down Obama’s “Right to Health Care,” old-school style.

By Bill Whittle

During the presidential debate Tuesday night, Barack Obama was asked if he thought health care was a “right.”

He said he thought it was a right. Well, if you accept that premise, I think you can ask some logical follow-up questions: Food is more important than health care. You die pretty quickly without food. Do we have a “right” to food in America? What about shelter? Do we have a “right” to housing? And if we do have a right to housing, what standard of housing do we have a right to? And if it is a right, due to all Americans, wouldn’t that mean that no one should have to accept any housing, or health care, which is inferior to anyone else’s… since it’s a right?

Do we have a right to be safe? Do we have a right to be comfortable? Do we have a right to wide-screen televisions? Where does this end?

See, by taking something to a ridiculous extreme, we can illuminate the problem here… what is a right? How do we know? What’s the difference between the right to free speech — which is enshrined in the Constitution — versus the “right” to health care, which is not?

Well, back in the day, we would simply say that a right has legal authority — it’s in the Constitution and therefore it’s a not just a right, it’s a birthright. So why shouldn’t we amend the Constitution to include the rights to health care, food, housing, education — all the rest? What’s the difference between the rights we have and the “rights” Obama wants to give us?

Simply this: Constitutional rights protect us from things: intimidation, illegal search and seizure, self-incrimination, and so on. The revolutionary idea of our Founding Fathers was that people had a God-given right to live as they saw fit. Our constitutional rights protect us from the power of government.

But these new so-called “rights” are about the government — who the Founders saw as the enemy — giving us things: food, health care, education... And when we have a right to be given stuff that previously we had to work for, then there is no reason — none — to go and work for them. The goody bag has no bottom, except bankruptcy and ruin.

Does that ring a little familiar these days? Because isn’t the danger here that if you’re offered something for nothing… you’ll take it?

Only it’s not something for nothing. “Free” health-care costs us something precious, and no less precious for being invisible. Because there’s a word for someone who has their food, housing and care provided for them… for people who owe their existence to someone else.

And that word is “slaves.”

Bill Whittle is an on-camera commentator at www.PJTV.com . You can find him online at www.ejectejecteject.com. He lives and works in Los Angeles.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billwhittle; obama; rights; whittle

1 posted on 10/09/2008 2:43:14 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

BINGO!


2 posted on 10/09/2008 2:51:24 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
there’s a word for someone who has their food, housing and care provided for them… for people who owe their existence to someone else. And that word is “slaves.”

Bears repeating...or shouting from rooftops!!!

3 posted on 10/09/2008 2:59:24 PM PDT by FollowingTheGrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Repeat:

Only it’s not something for nothing. “Free” health-care costs us something precious, and no less precious for being invisible. Because there’s a word for someone who has their food, housing and care provided for them… for people who owe their existence to someone else.

And that word is “slaves.”

4 posted on 10/09/2008 3:28:33 PM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If that deviated a micron from the center of the bullseye, I can't detect it.

"Because there’s a word for someone who has their food, housing and care provided for them… for people who owe their existence to someone else.

And that word is 'slaves.'”

I think people who would make us slaves are also the enemy.

5 posted on 10/09/2008 3:59:11 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It bares mentioning that all American’s DO have health care. Its the health insurance that is the problem. Chicago’s WLS talk radio has a regular host on who is from Canada that knows this issue from the inside and his stories are scary about what they get control of when the law got passed up there.

JB


6 posted on 10/09/2008 5:24:52 PM PDT by thatjoeguy (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; Valin; King Prout; SJackson; dennisw; ...
Bill Whittle every Friday? 3 weeks and coming? I take it


Bill Whittle Nailed It!

This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for the perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author all 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of the good stuff that is worthy of attention. You can see the list of articles I pinged to lately  on  my page.
You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about). Besides this one, I keep 2 separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson and Orson Scott Card.  

7 posted on 10/10/2008 6:11:56 AM PDT by Tolik (2008: Maverick/Barracuda vs. Messiah/Mouth or The Hero vs. the Zero and "Our mama beats your Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

To put into simple and Biblical terms: you can tell good from evil by the fruit that it bears. Other nations already show the fruits born of socialism.


8 posted on 10/10/2008 7:16:56 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (BO [my plane stinks] Change is BS Change. Ayers+Raines+ACORN=RICO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the post and the ping.

I am a huge Bill Whittle fan.

Eject! Eject! Eject! is one of my favorite blogs. I highly commend that site to all Real Americans!


9 posted on 10/10/2008 8:44:24 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But these new so-called “rights” are about the government — who the Founders saw as the enemy — giving us things: food, health care, education... And when we have a right to be given stuff that previously we had to work for, then there is no reason — none — to go and work for them. The goody bag has no bottom, except bankruptcy and ruin.

Here's how I look at it:

The Constitution is the birth certificate of the government, or its blueprint. The Preamble defines the underlying reasons why it was created but, of course, carries no legal authority. The various Articles in the main body spell out the elements of the government and their various jobs and authority (all of which are limited to those mentioned. There's mention of a way to amend the thing. Then we come to the Bill of Rights...just in case the limitations on the power of the fed.gov aren't clear. The BOR acts as a series of specific limitations on government power - just as Whittle stated. It is NOT, repeat NOT a granting of rights of any kind, nor is it some kind of laundry list of goodies that the government owes the people - because the government IS the people, and the Founders would think that anyone holding such a notion was a candidate for the nut house.

Nobama wants more rights, let him propose amendments - now, before the election, if he's got the b@lls. After all, he wants to "change America."

10 posted on 10/10/2008 8:55:32 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Student

I agree..this was a great column. Right on target, and succinct.


11 posted on 10/10/2008 10:13:11 AM PDT by Crolis (Married since June 7, 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If your exercise of your right imposes an obligation on somebody else (beyond “leaving you alone”) it’s not a right.


12 posted on 10/10/2008 12:01:14 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson