Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Held Membership in Socialist New Party
The New Media Journal ^ | 10/09/2008

Posted on 10/09/2008 6:55:06 AM PDT by The_Tick_01

Evidence is continuing to surface that indicates Barack Obama was a member of the Socialist New Party, an organization headquartered in Chicago during the mid-1990s. The New Party was formed to serve as a in Chicago by the Democrat Socialists of America in 1992 to serve as a central coordinating body for various Socialist Party activities in the region. It survived until 2000, when it disintegrated into its various factions. The Organization experienced a bump in membership in the late 1990s but was all but defunct by 2000 in part because of a Supreme Court decision that ruled the organizations "fusion" reform platform as unconstitutional.

The document uncovered by a variety of internet publications including Politically Drunk on Power, the Jawa Report, No Quarter, NewsBusters and Libertarian Republican, shows documents, webpages, that had been scrubbed from the New Party’s website but that had been archived by the non-profit Internet Archive Organization, that prove beyond question Obama's membership in the Party. One document states: "Illinois: Three NP members won Democratic Primaries last Spring and face-off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (US House), Barack Obama (State Senate), Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)."

(Excerpt) Read more at newmediajournal.us ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; commievote; democrats; democratsocialists; dsa; elections; issues; newparty; nobama08; obama; obamarxist; radicalleft; socialism; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
As the campaign continues to rage on, we learn more and more about who Barack Obama is. Apparently he was a member of “The Socialist New Party”. Every day it becomes more and more apparent that this man has no love for the America that our founding fathers created.
1 posted on 10/09/2008 6:55:07 AM PDT by The_Tick_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
 
http://www.pastorinofarms.com/special/smiling_pumpkin.gif
 
 

2 posted on 10/09/2008 6:57:42 AM PDT by littlehouse36 (Those who are kind to the cruel, in the end will be cruel to the kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
Photobucket
3 posted on 10/09/2008 6:59:39 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh (I cling to guns and religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
JEEZ!! America is about to be taken over by Cook County, Illinois!


4 posted on 10/09/2008 7:04:41 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (MCCAIN/PALIN '08!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
American Corruption for Obama Right Now
5 posted on 10/09/2008 7:08:13 AM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01

Lies!

Lies and Smears!

Smears and Lies!

Yes, Mr. Obama, but PLEASE address the ISSUE at hand. Just tell us, WERE you in fact a member of this political party?

Lies!

Lies and Smears!

Smears and Lies!

Racist to even ASK that question...

etc. etc. etc.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 7:08:18 AM PDT by WayneS (Vote Obama bin Biden 2008 - "Because the world doesn't suck enough yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

So that’s what that actually means...Good One!!!


7 posted on 10/09/2008 7:09:27 AM PDT by FlashBack (www.proudpatriots.org/www.woundedwarriorproject.org/www.moveamericaforward.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01

It’s official name is the “New Party”, it may be socialist, but that should be a lower case “s” in this case.


8 posted on 10/09/2008 7:13:09 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
“The Socialist New Party”

That's not nearly as bad as someone hinting, someplace that Sarah Palin was or might have been (we don't have any details on this - although we will search and search until something can be found) a member of the AIP.

< /sarc>

9 posted on 10/09/2008 7:14:49 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01

In 1991, Clinton constantly dodged allegations of sexual immorality. In the end, it consumed his presidency. Obama has been dodging socialim and “hate America” friends. It will get worse after he’s elected.


10 posted on 10/09/2008 7:16:14 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01

But, but, but Sarah Palin’s husband was a member of the Alaska Independence Party and as Mayor she was photographed with a John Birch Society publication on her desk. That’s what’s relevant. /s

In all seriousness, I suspect his association with the “The Socialist New Party” will become a campaign ad shortly. And the that shown together with that party’s platform should really wake people up.


11 posted on 10/09/2008 7:17:31 AM PDT by CedarDave (Hey, John -- "Country First" is getting yourself elected. Take the fight to Obama and the Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

It is actually just the “New Party”. It’s platform is socialist but its name is not.


12 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

He should have been vetted by the media long ago. If he is elected and turns this country into third world ghetto with “That One” as dictator and living conditions for many on the par with his brother. The msm will have some serious questions to answer.


13 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:23 AM PDT by lakeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The New Party was formed in Chicago by the Democrat Socialists of America in 1992 to serve as a central coordinating body for various Socialist Party activities in the region.

Too bad they couldn't add 'workers' into their title.

National Democrat Socialists Workers Party has a certain sentimental ring to it.

14 posted on 10/09/2008 7:35:52 AM PDT by yooling (The MSM is to Obama as Ron Santo is to the Cubs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lakeman

Without sounding like a conspiracy theorist, here’s the picture that I’m beginning to see emerge. The Socialist Party has been working quietly behind the scenes for many years. And now with all that’s happening on the political & financial fronts, all the pieces seem to be coming together for a Socialist government to be set up. With people like George Soros(dubbed “the man who broke the bank of England” in Oct. ‘92) and Khalid al-Mansour(advisor to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Tatal), & their vast wealth, with putting Obama(the puppet)into office, a leftist Congress, a VERY biased MSM, what’s the one last thing needed to establish a new government? MONEY! Hence, the bailout, first starting out at $700 million & growing everyday. So now the U.S. goernment owns financial instituitons....big ones. They’ll take the bailout money from the U.S. Treasury & sink it into(supposedly) comapanies they own. The average American is scared right now, & rightfully so. They see their savings disappear, prices rising higher & higher, & the people behind the scenes like that fear just fine. It distracts from a much bigger issue...Socialism. They’re keeping the right hand busy so it doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. That’s just my opinion.


15 posted on 10/09/2008 8:18:54 AM PDT by GypsyWoman124 (GypsyWoman124)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GypsyWoman124

I meant to type $700 Billion instead of million. Sorry.


16 posted on 10/09/2008 8:38:15 AM PDT by GypsyWoman124 (GypsyWoman124)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GypsyWoman124

I meant to type $700 BILLION instead of million. Sorry.


17 posted on 10/09/2008 8:38:36 AM PDT by GypsyWoman124 (GypsyWoman124)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01

So I guess we choose between socialism and socialism lite?

Or is McCain going to drop out and let me vote for Palin at the head of the ticket?

I am unutterably discouraged here.


18 posted on 10/09/2008 8:49:06 AM PDT by slnk_rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GypsyWoman124
From Powerline Blog, here is an interesting tidbit...



"Three NP-members won Democratic prmaries last Spring...Barack Obama (State Senate)...

Is there something I am missing?
19 posted on 10/09/2008 8:50:35 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Let's get serious - there is only one choice - McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The_Tick_01
Ok NOW maybe we're getting somewhere. Tom Ridge is now on FOXNews talking about the importance of info on the Obama/Ayers/domestic terror connection and also about Obama never having even acknowledged the success of the Surge.
20 posted on 10/09/2008 8:56:55 AM PDT by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson