To: steve-b
daughter received a certified letter in the mail yesterday from the city of orlando florida...inside 3 pictures showing her car running a red light....cost...125.00
2 posted on
09/17/2008 1:27:17 PM PDT by
tatsinfla
To: tatsinfla
6 posted on
09/17/2008 1:32:54 PM PDT by
BGHater
(Democracy is the road to socialism.)
To: tatsinfla
daughter received a certified letter in the mail yesterday from the city of orlando florida...inside 3 pictures showing her car running a red light....cost...125.00 Send a picture of 125.00 back :)
19 posted on
09/17/2008 1:48:51 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
To: tatsinfla
daughter received a certified letter in the mail yesterday from the city of orlando florida...inside 3 pictures showing her car running a red light....cost...125.00 That would be $373 in California.
To: tatsinfla
wassn’t there a case recently about being able to prove who was driving the vehicle?
27 posted on
09/17/2008 1:55:17 PM PDT by
absolootezer0
( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
To: tatsinfla
Was she driving? The problem with these systems in the past has been that they could not identify who was driving. Has that been fixed?
30 posted on
09/17/2008 2:04:30 PM PDT by
dools007
To: tatsinfla
City of Orlando will be lucky to get half of that money. The lights are likely owned by a private company.
The only upside of such cameras is that city vehicles (buses, school buses, city management, and police) are getting ticketed for “non-emergency” light running for the first time in their lives as well. And the cities are passing the bills to the drivers, not covering it out of the budget. The private companies that own these lights want there money EVERY time.
57 posted on
09/18/2008 9:05:07 AM PDT by
weegee
(Say no to the Marxist who "denounces" the 911 terrorist attacks and yet befriended a Pentagon bomber)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
