Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Attempts To Smear Palin And Fails
America Talks ^ | 09/14/08 | David Zublick

Posted on 09/14/2008 9:50:27 AM PDT by AmericaTalks

Sarah Palin's interview with Charlie Gibson was an appalling attempt at smearing her, even to the point that some in the mainstream media even took Gibson and ABC News to task on it.

From the outset, it was clear that Gibson planned to paint her as completely inept and unqualified. The very first question, asking Palin if she hesitated when McCain offered her a spot on the ticket, dripped with condescension. Here was Gibson, looking professorial with his glasses down at the end of his nose, eyebrow cocked, as if to portray her as a liar, or so self-assured as to be arrogant. But Palin handled it quite well, explaining that if she felt she could benefit McCain and be of service to our nation, there was no need to hesitate.

On her faith, Gibson misrepresented what she had said about God's role in the Iraq war. Through careful editing, viewers of the interview did not get an opportunity to hear her full answer. Gibson asked Palin: "You said recently in your old church, 'Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.' Are we fighting a Holy War?"

Palin answered, "You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote."

"It’s exact words," Gibson said.

But Gibson’s quote left out what Palin said before that:

"Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God. That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan."

This response appears in the transcript but was edited out of the televised version. That leaves a false impression of her answer and is a deliberate smear.

Palin also told Gibson that she was referring to Abraham’s Lincoln’s words on how one should never presume to know God’s will. She said she does not presume to know God’s will and that she was only asking the audience to "pray that we are on God’s side."

The liberal press even took ABC to task. The far left L.A. Times rebuked Gibson for distorting Palin's remarks.

Gibson also ambushed Palin with the question regarding the definition of the Bush Doctrine. No official doctrine exists, and the definition of the term was coined by Charles Krauthammer. In a column appearing in the Washington Post on September 13th, Krauthammer wrote "There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different."

So it becomes exceedingly clear that ABC and Gibson were going for the 'gotcha' moment. They failed to get one. Palin acquitted herself well in the interview.

The elite media had better be careful as to how they attempt to paint Sarah Palin. The more they go after her, the more invincible she becomes. At one time, Barack Obama was the Teflon candidate. But as time goes by, people are seeing that the emperor has no clothes. Obama is sizzle and no steak. And the sizzle is cooling off, as polls seem to show a growing admiration and respect for the McCain-Palin ticket by conservatives, independents and women.

Democrats are running scared. They are not sure Obama is the candidate that will make it over the finish line. They are beginning to regret that Hillary Clinton was not offered the number two spot on the ticket. And democrats are even worried about congressional races as the bloom fades from the Obama rose.

Palin is the real deal. Obama is an empty suit. The closer we get to this election, the clearer it becomes.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; abc; abcnews; bias; campaigns; charliegibson; chucklestheclown; elections; failures; gibson; mccain; mccainpalin; mediabias; msm; palin; propagandawingofdnc; smearcampaign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2008 9:50:28 AM PDT by AmericaTalks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

bump


2 posted on 09/14/2008 9:53:39 AM PDT by lowbridge (Biden is an expert on almost every subject that has ever come before the Congress. -Linda Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
Gibson, looking professorial with his glasses down at the end of his nose, eyebrow cocked...

"professorial"?

No.

He looked like a complete and total a$$h@le.

3 posted on 09/14/2008 9:54:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

Just the act of looking over the eye glasses, at some one you are talking to, is an act of condescension. IMO


4 posted on 09/14/2008 9:54:32 AM PDT by duckman (I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
The way they handled this interview was outrageous, and thy even edited her answers to make her look bad. ABC is a left wing tool.

(click me) Now available at cafepress.com

5 posted on 09/14/2008 9:54:37 AM PDT by chaos_5 (See my profile for cool McCain/Palin "lipstick" stickers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

Got by his own gotcha.


6 posted on 09/14/2008 9:55:30 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
"Through careful editing, viewers of the interview did not get an opportunity to hear her full answer."

Yellow journalism at its worst.

7 posted on 09/14/2008 9:55:31 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

He meant to write ProfessWhoreial?


8 posted on 09/14/2008 9:55:31 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (OBAMA: He was a flop before he became a flipper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
"Obama is all sizzle and no steak..."

Yes, and the "sizzle" is starting to fizzle, if you know what I mean.

9 posted on 09/14/2008 9:55:31 AM PDT by BombHollywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

Poor Charlie...he can’t hep it...he was born with a silver spoon up his....


10 posted on 09/14/2008 9:56:20 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
“that ABC and Gibson were going for the ‘gotcha’ moment”

How do you feel now Gibson?
You have smeared yourself.
America knows exactly what you are, you can't hide behind that slow demeanor now.
My opinion, your character and trust is in the gutter. I will never let you enter my home again.

11 posted on 09/14/2008 9:57:24 AM PDT by DaltonNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

*yawn* Media smear campaign - yet again ..... why am I not surprised ..... all Obama-bambi has to do is call down the wrath of Mohammad and zot Palin .... why bother with the media????


12 posted on 09/14/2008 9:58:29 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

I’ve been trying to figure out Ubama’s/MSM’s strategy to get him in the White House, and with each gaffe that happens almost on a daily basis now by both of them, I’m starting to worry about the “October Surprise” coming up—hubby thinks Biden is planning to step down ‘for the good of the party and the country’ and then Ubama will ask Hillary to sacrifice herself ‘for the good of the party and the country’ to try to win back all the PUMA’s etc...I’m not sure about that but considering all the stupid, foot in mouth, sophomoric mistakes that the demmies have been making lately, I’m starting to wonder!! You know it’s bad when liberals call you on your attacks on Palin, LOL!! Charlie screwed up...Baba Wawa should have interviewed the governor first, then we would have at least known what kind of Alaskan tree she thinks she is, LOL!! :-)


13 posted on 09/14/2008 9:59:20 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative leaning toward the McCain/Palin ticket now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks
Gibson with Obama: smiling, relaxed, polite, enabling.

Gibson with Palin: sneering, scowling, skeptical, condescending, rude.

What a disgrace!

14 posted on 09/14/2008 10:01:20 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman
Just the act of looking over the eye glasses, at some one you are talking to, is an act of condescension.

Carl Levin does it too.......

15 posted on 09/14/2008 10:01:48 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Polar bears who suffer depression and anxiety due to the global warming threat are bi-polar bears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yep, as an economics prof, I object to calling Gibson professorial. What he looked was confrontational.


16 posted on 09/14/2008 10:02:54 AM PDT by JLS (Do you really want changec being two guys from the majority of Congress with a 9% approval rating?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericaTalks

Ver well stated, David. Is it OK to forward this via e-mail? We need to get this word out.


17 posted on 09/14/2008 10:03:33 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
“Carl Levin does it too.......”
I know, I was thinking of him when I wrote the post. I have had several managers who wore those 1/2 lens eye glasses. When they called you into their office and looked over those glasses at you, well.....
18 posted on 09/14/2008 10:06:47 AM PDT by duckman (I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’ve posted this before,

What the MSM is doing is nothing more than trying to Rape Sarah Palin in front of our eyes....

They need to be punished

Republicans should ALL rally to her help...as they did with Reagan

I’m fed up with these standards...


19 posted on 09/14/2008 10:08:42 AM PDT by forYourChildrenVote4Bush (Today, July 16th I no longer donate money for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: duckman
Just the act of looking over the eye glasses, at some one you are talking to, is an act of condescension.

You may come to think differently when you start needing reading glasses. Then it's not an act of condescension but of focus.

20 posted on 09/14/2008 10:09:54 AM PDT by dorothy ( “Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason.” —Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson