Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: 69% Say Reporters Try To Help The Candidate They Want To Win (5-1 Margin for Obama!)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | September 10, 2008

Posted on 09/10/2008 9:52:56 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah

Seven out of 10 voters (69%) remain convinced that reporters try to help the candidate they want to win, and this year by a nearly five-to-one margin voters believe they are trying to help Barack Obama.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 50% of voters think most reporters are trying to help Obama win versus 11% who believe they are trying to help his Republican opponent John McCain. Twenty-six percent (26%) say reporters offer unbiased coverage (demographic crosstabs available for Premium Members).

Just last week a Rasmussen Reports survey found that 51% of voters believed reporters were trying to hurt McCain’s running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, with their news coverage.

Interestingly, while 83% of Republican voters think most reporters are trying to help Obama, 19% of Democrats agree, one percentage point higher than the number of Democrats who believe they are trying to help McCain. Unaffiliated voters by a 53% to 10% margin see reporters trying to help Obama.

Forty-five percent (45%) of Democrats say most reporters are providing unbiased coverage in the current presidential campaign, but only 20% of unaffiliateds and nine percent (9%) of Republicans agree.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls).

Voters from both parties, however, are skeptical of media bias in general. Eighty-six percent (86%) of Republicans think reporters try to help the candidate they want to win, and a plurality of Democrats (49%) believe that, too. Seventy-four percent (74%) of unaffiliated voters agree.

Only 21% of voters overall say reporters try to offer unbiased coverage.

These numbers track closely with findings from a Rasmussen Reports survey in mid-July and follow criticism throughout last week’s Republican convention of media coverage viewed as exceptionally hostile to Palin. Democrats, however, are a bit more questioning of the media now and slightly less inclined to regard them as favorable to Obama.

Among all voters, 57% believe Obama has received the best treatment by the media, while 21% say McCain has been treated best. Only nine percent (9%) believe the media has been most favorable to Senator Hillary Clinton, who was Obama’s closest rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Forty-two percent (42%) think reporters would hide information that hurts the candidate they want to win, but 34% do not agree. But there’s a partisan divide here: While 63% of likely McCain voters believe reporters would hide information harmful to the candidate they favor, 52% of potential Obama voters do not agree.

Perhaps this explains why 46% of voters say they most trust information about the presidential campaign from family and friends as opposed to 32% who trust the information from news reporters more.

Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update (it’s free)… let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.
See survey questions and toplines. Crosstabs available for Premium Members only.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; equaltime; feclaws; howtostealanelection; mccain; media; mediabias; obama; partisanmedia; partisanpress; propagandanwingofdnc; stalinisttactics; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2008 9:52:57 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Well, maybe the American public gets it.


2 posted on 09/10/2008 9:54:05 PM PDT by popdonnelly (I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I think 69% is pretty low.


3 posted on 09/10/2008 9:54:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (McCain/Palin '08! Real change you won't have to "believe in." You'll be able to see it!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

5-1 ? is that all ?


4 posted on 09/10/2008 9:54:56 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

50% of voters think most reporters are trying to help Obama win

Republicans and other fair people.

**************************************************************

11% who believe they are trying to help his Republican opponent John McCain.

Democrats

**********************************************************

26% say reporters offer unbiased coverage

Oblivious


5 posted on 09/10/2008 9:55:32 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Barack 0bama has "Jumped the Pig".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
LOL, and they think they are soooo slick!


6 posted on 09/10/2008 10:01:43 PM PDT by chaos_5 (Why I dont like McCain -> http://www.johnmccain.com/climatechange/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

and the liberal elite thought they had snookered the redneck ignorants that are not them. No way! The joke is on the ignoramus elites. They aren’t foolin’ a whole lot of people.


7 posted on 09/10/2008 10:09:28 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

Love it!


8 posted on 09/10/2008 10:10:17 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I wonder why they’d think that? More than Matthews have been feeling the tingles and letting all of us know about it. Disgusting.


9 posted on 09/10/2008 10:10:23 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
Thanks! I hope the idea catches on. =o)
10 posted on 09/10/2008 10:16:01 PM PDT by chaos_5 (Why I dont like McCain -> http://www.johnmccain.com/climatechange/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: chaos_5

Absolutely wonderful! Obama is like a big daddy long legs stumbling around...


12 posted on 09/10/2008 10:18:13 PM PDT by Libertina (Sarah Palin for VP - not because she is a woman, but for the woman she is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

People know whats going on. Every time Obama opens his arrogant mouth, every time the media tells the public what they should do, every time they try to make Sarah Palin out to be an ignorant redneck....Ka-Ching! ....more votes for Mc/Palin. Liberals are mentally ill, they refuse to believe they are wrong...so everyone else must be. This will be the most lopsided election in the history of this country and the libs have only themselves to blame.


13 posted on 09/10/2008 10:25:23 PM PDT by Snurple (VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Photobucket
14 posted on 09/10/2008 10:34:56 PM PDT by xuberalles (The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties On The Net! http://www.cafepress.com/titillatingtees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

A CHANGE is gonna come. People are gonna CHANGE the channel and not watch these anchors anymore. They are going to CHANGE their reading habits. They are “tuned in” to what the Major Media is saying, “turning on” to the alternative means of communication, and “tuning out” on the daily DNC talking points.

A change is gonna come.
A change is gonna come.

The jig is up.


15 posted on 09/10/2008 10:37:56 PM PDT by weegee (Say no to the Marxist who "denounces" the 911 terrorist attacks and yet befriended a Pentagon bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb; Milhous

FYI.


16 posted on 09/10/2008 10:45:01 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (1 conservative = 5 RINOs. You can expect 4 out of 5 RINOs to bolt to the liberal side on any vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
You gotta laugh at the liberal elitists. They try to bend the will of the country to their high brow concepts of reality breed from urban centeres of unreality. Then when their numbers drop, papers don't sell and the people dare turn against them they wonder what happened. Unfortunately for them the stylistic aspects of network programming are derived top down and the owners are so egotistical as to know what's best for America since they are so rich: Being rich defines their right... Change will only occur when the debate is taken to the country as it is now and the news media is exposed for what it is. We've lost perspective in this country, debate and political understanding and involvement not withstanding.

I see hope though, this election cycle is teaching us all valuable lessons about how politics and politicians affect our lives and it doesn't seem that we as whole are all that thrilled with the results of the last 30 years or so. I envision us as a Nation taking these lessons and building upon them, bringing about a new era of accountability, ourselves to government and government to us. We the People, not We the Sheeple!! And the ones in government that don't get it - let's toss them the Hell out!

17 posted on 09/10/2008 10:59:28 PM PDT by CBF (It's the law stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

You must be mistaken, they Said their unbiased, so they must be, right?

ok I’d be extremely gullible to believe that.


18 posted on 09/10/2008 11:11:59 PM PDT by mtnjimmi (“When you choose the lesser of two evils, always remember that it is still an evil.” Max Lerner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“I think 69% is pretty low.”

It’s a lot better than it was in 1981. Back then it was pretty easy to feel like the Lone Ranger.


19 posted on 09/10/2008 11:38:30 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee
The Liberal Dinosaur Media can see their influence waning and are using it in a last desperate attempt to elect their socialist buddy. They realize that they will have only half as much influence 4 years from now. So use it or loose it.
20 posted on 09/10/2008 11:54:37 PM PDT by ME-262 (Nancy Pelosi is known to the state of CA to render Viagra ineffective causing reproductive harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson