Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Park attendants ordered to interrogate adults without children (UK)
Daily Mail ^ | 10th September 2008 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 09/10/2008 12:25:57 PM PDT by libertarian27

Park wardens have been ordered to stop and interrogate anyone who is not accompanied by children.

The visitors who are quizzed have to explain their presence and risk being thrown out or reported to police if their answers are not satisfactory.

The policy has been introduced at Telford Town Park in Shropshire. The council which manages the 420-acre area says it is a 'commonsense approach' aimed at safeguarding children.

But park users accused it of 'authoritarian madness' and said the ruling risked panicking parents about the dangers faced from potential paedophiles.

The policy came to light after two environmental campaigners dressed as penguins were thrown out of the park last month when caught handing out leaflets on climate change.

Telford and Wrekin Council said Rachel Whittaker and Neil Donaldson were ejected because they had not undergone Criminal Records Bureau checks or risk assessments before entering the park - a requirement under the Child Protection Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; nannystate; privacy; yourpapersplease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2008 12:25:57 PM PDT by libertarian27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

“Telford and Wrekin Council said Rachel Whittaker and Neil Donaldson were ejected because they had not undergone Criminal Records Bureau checks or risk assessments before entering the park - a requirement under the Child Protection Act.”

Gotta love anarcho-tyranny, UK-style.

From comments on the daily mail site, this is a tory-run council.


2 posted on 09/10/2008 12:29:43 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27
Having been to England many times and having friends there, why am I not surprised at the increasing big brother-ism of UK society and government.

For a country with so many TV surveillance cameras and “traffic control” devices and impediments, they have a very high crime rate. Much higher than America.

Political correctness gone mad. Goodbye England. The UK, soon to be Islamic.

3 posted on 09/10/2008 12:32:49 PM PDT by garyhope (It's world war IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam. VRWC. TWP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

I wonder why the Nazis made war on Britain? Britain came around to their form of government afterall.


4 posted on 09/10/2008 12:34:20 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

Shropshire? Why that’s the ‘ome of the Shropshire Slasher. I saw it on a Daffy Duck cartoon.


5 posted on 09/10/2008 12:34:54 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

Let them try that stunt on a moose limb!


6 posted on 09/10/2008 12:34:56 PM PDT by Cheapskate (Play loud and carry BIG sticks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
From comments on the daily mail site, this is a tory-run council.

I read those too, it doesn't make any sense, pre-determining adults are pedophiles just because they don't have a kid with them sounds so New-Labour/ Liberal

7 posted on 09/10/2008 12:40:18 PM PDT by libertarian27 (McCain/Palin '08. My Electile Dysfunction is cured!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

It’s a bit rich the Daily Mail moaning about this when they and all the other tabloid scum-rags were responsible for whipping up the ludicrously OTT anti-paedophile hysteria in the first place. It just opens up yet another motherload of righteous indignation that they can tap into to feed to the multitudes of imbeciles who pay to read this stuff....


8 posted on 09/10/2008 12:43:18 PM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

Dude, this is a good thing.

Ask any mother that takes her children to a park to play. They are always on the watch out for a lone male that doesn’t seem to have any reason to be there. Especially if he is wearing sunglasses (the ones so you can’t see his eyes, so you don’t know where he is looking.)


9 posted on 09/10/2008 12:44:42 PM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
The English poet and classical scholar A. E. Housman wrote a collection of poems called A Shropshire Lad, but he was born in Worcestershire. I don't know why he didn't call it A Worcestershire Lad.
10 posted on 09/10/2008 12:50:11 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Dude, this is a good thing.

Good thing - Parents keeping an eye on their toddlers while in the park. Can't argue with that!

Bad thing - throwing adults out of the park without a molecule of probable cause.

11 posted on 09/10/2008 12:51:24 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (America's never won a "war" unless the enemy was named using a proper noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Dude, this is a good thing.

This is a good thing? The loss of liberty? Or at least someone else's loss of liberty?

But, I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the policy were aimed at overweight, undereducated, dowdy housewives, unfairly impinging on your rights.

12 posted on 09/10/2008 12:56:07 PM PDT by E. Cartman (GOP Convention 2008: Nothing but "The Emperor's New Clothes" redux.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Dude, this is a good thing.

This is a good thing? The loss of liberty? Or at least someone else's loss of liberty?

But, I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if the policy were aimed at overweight, undereducated, dowdy housewives, unfairly impinging on your rights.

13 posted on 09/10/2008 12:56:15 PM PDT by E. Cartman (GOP Convention 2008: Nothing but "The Emperor's New Clothes" redux.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Ask any mother that takes her children to a park to play. They are always on the watch out for a lone male that doesn’t seem to have any reason to be there.

Parents Should keep an eye out for their children, but to pre-ordain that some Adult walking in a park alone must be a Pedophile and must be stopped and questioned is ludicrous.

14 posted on 09/10/2008 12:57:56 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I didn't know one needed a reason to be in a park. I thought parks were for doing nothing except relaxing, enjoying the outdoors and taking walks. Perhaps they should establish separate male and female parks like everything in the Islamofascist countries.

Yes, pedophilia is a bad and sick thing, but should they also start questioning any single female in parks. They could be prostitutes or sexual predators on the lookout for young men to seduce. Have you seen in the news the large amount of female teachers having sex with their male students. Seems like it's a higher percentage than the male teachers.

15 posted on 09/10/2008 12:59:14 PM PDT by garyhope (It's world war IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam. VRWC. TWP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

420 acres?!? Sounds like a helluva lot more than a kiddie park.

And “Great” Britain wants to protect children? Since when? That’s the same place where some mental defectives suggested that children that don’t clean their plates could be tarred with the epithet “racist”.


16 posted on 09/10/2008 1:05:55 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

freeriders?


17 posted on 09/10/2008 1:10:33 PM PDT by Hoodlum91 (I support global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

Loitering laws went out because they weren’t PC, but they served a purpose.

If you see someone that seems totally out of place in an area, it is reasonable to ask what they are doing there.


18 posted on 09/10/2008 1:13:23 PM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Ask any mother that takes her children to a park to play. They are always on the watch out for a lone male that doesn’t seem to have any reason to be there. Especially if he is wearing sunglasses (the ones so you can’t see his eyes, so you don’t know where he is looking.)

Gotcha. So, a citizen peacefully and lawfully using a public park should be targetted by the authorities if he happens to be a guy wearing sunglasses. That's a policy perfectly in tune with the idea of liberty and freedom / sarc

19 posted on 09/10/2008 1:15:05 PM PDT by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91; JimWforBush; martin_fierro; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; najida; Tijeras_Slim; ...

FREERIDERS..........PING!!!!


20 posted on 09/10/2008 1:23:08 PM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Some days it is not worth chewing through the restraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson