Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

weaponize: Make into or use as a weapon or a potential weapon (wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn) To make into a weapon; To make more effective as a weapon (en.wiktionary.org/wiki/weaponize)
1 posted on 08/27/2008 7:09:21 AM PDT by Prunetacos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Shermy; EdLake

ping


2 posted on 08/27/2008 7:12:09 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

related

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/86/i34/8634notw1.html


3 posted on 08/27/2008 7:15:30 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

For a second there I thought the title read “Secret Santa.”


4 posted on 08/27/2008 7:26:43 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (No better friend, no worse enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

Can you say “drastic overhype”. There is nothing “nanotech” about the methods used. It is plain old electron microscopy, as done in dozens of labs around the world on a daily basis. I suspect Sandia was used more for their security clearances than for the technology.


5 posted on 08/27/2008 7:27:15 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos; Perdogg; nw_arizona_granny

Thanks for the post; link. Interesting. Ping.


6 posted on 08/27/2008 7:29:23 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

The headline does not match the article. There is nothing in it about determining the anthrax origin. Three of the samples looked alike under high magnification. Nothing more, nothing less.


9 posted on 08/27/2008 7:31:01 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

The FBI’s position is that he did not follow instructions had not been given.

QUESTION: Was he the only person submitted before the subpoena was sent out?

BACKGROUND OFFICIAL: Yes. He was the only one.
***
BACKGROUND OFFICIAL: Let me clarify something first here. The first sample that he submitted was rejected because it was outside of the subpoena process. It didn’t comply with the full instructions of the subpoena.


15 posted on 08/27/2008 11:45:14 AM PDT by ZACKandPOOK ( http://www.anthraxandalqaeda.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prunetacos

DR. MAJIDI: The total body — the total universe of people at some point were associated with RMR-029 — I’ll qualify that. Roughly, about 100-plus.

QUESTION: Hundred-plus. Were those all at Detrick, or other labs —

DR. MAJIDI: No, they were at Detrick and other labs.

Comment:

OTHER LABS. Plural. Not one other lab as some press reports mistakenly reported. Labs. Not 100. About 100-plus. Plus means “more than 100.”


16 posted on 08/27/2008 11:47:46 AM PDT by ZACKandPOOK ( http://www.anthraxandalqaeda.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson