ping
“(anthrax)in those letters was not a weaponized form, a form of the bacteria prepared to disperse more readily.”
Anthrax in the letters was NOT weaponized....
it just acted as though it was!
I've had a couple long phone discussions with scientists who analyzed the attack anthrax spores. Plus, we now have PICTURES of the attack spores.
There is absolutely NO DOUBT that the spores were not "weaponized" by the addition of silica of some kind.
The silicon that was found was INSIDE the spores. It was NOT -- repeat NOT on the outside of the spores.
So, any theory that says silica was deliberately added to aid in keeping the spores from clumping is just plain WRONG.
And that is demonstrated by the picture of a clump of spores from one of the senate letters. There is NO visible silica AND the spores are in a clump.
Anthrax spores that are NOT "weaponized" with silica can also be very deadly. That's been known for over a hundred years, but some people just take a lot longer to grasp the facts.
