Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge says UC can deny class credit to Christian school students
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/12/8 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 08/12/2008 6:49:07 PM PDT by SmithL

SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the University of California can deny course credit to applicants from Christian high schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible and reject evolution.

Rejecting claims of religious discrimination and stifling of free expression, U.S. District Judge James Otero of Los Angeles said UC's review committees cited legitimate reasons for rejecting the texts - not because they contained religious viewpoints, but because they omitted important topics in science and history and failed to teach critical thinking.

Otero's ruling Friday, which focused on specific courses and texts, followed his decision in March that found no anti-religious bias in the university's system of reviewing high school classes. Now that the lawsuit has been dismissed, a group of Christian schools has appealed Otero's rulings to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

"It appears the UC is attempting to secularize private religious schools," attorney Jennifer Monk of Advocates for Faith and Freedom said today. Her clients include the Association of Christian Schools International, two Southern California high schools and several students.

Charles Robinson, the university's vice president for legal affairs, said the ruling "confirms that UC may apply the same admissions standards to all students and to all high schools without regard to their religious affiliations." What the plaintiffs seek, he said, is a "religious exemption from regular admissions standards."

The suit, filed in 2005, challenged UC's review of high school courses taken by would-be applicants to the 10-campus system. Most students qualify by taking an approved set of college preparatory classes; students whose courses lack UC approval can remain eligible by scoring well in those subjects on the Scholastic Assessment Test.

Christian schools in the suit accused the university of rejecting courses that include any religious viewpoint, "any instance of God's guidance

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: academia; activistjudge; antiamerican; antichristian; antichristianbias; christianpersecution; christianschools; christianstudents; highereducation; judiciary; notchristian; ruling; uc; unamerican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2008 6:49:08 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Otero, S. James
Born 1951 in Los Angeles, CA

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Central District of California
Nominated by George W. Bush on January 7, 2003, to a seat vacated by Richard A. Paez; Confirmed by the Senate on February 10, 2003, and received commission on February 12, 2003.

Education:
California State University, B.A., 1973

Stanford Law School, J.D., 1976

Professional Career:
Law clerk/attorney, Office of the City Attorney, Los Angeles, California, 1976-1987
General counsel & vice president, Regional Counsel Southern Pacific Transportation, 1987-1988
Judge, Municipal Court of Los Angeles, California, 1988-1990
Judge, Superior Court of the State of California, 1990-2003

Race or Ethnicity: Hispanic

Gender: Male

2 posted on 08/12/2008 6:49:27 PM PDT by SmithL (Drill Dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

more discrimination of religion for christians while we embrace muslim beliefs and sharia law.

we are being primed.


3 posted on 08/12/2008 6:51:30 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Wonder if Otero believes in hell?
Seems to me to exlude religious thought or teaching is discrimination that is anti the First Ammendment.


4 posted on 08/12/2008 6:53:41 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Translation: Otero has never had to actually work for a living.


5 posted on 08/12/2008 6:54:21 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
because they omitted important topics in science and history and failed to teach critical thinking.

Meanwhile, the public schools do this, but their courses are accepted.

6 posted on 08/12/2008 6:55:14 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

7 posted on 08/12/2008 6:55:25 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

There will be a lot of “critical thinking” in hell.


8 posted on 08/12/2008 6:55:54 PM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

A Christian text that thoroughly covered evolution ought to be allowed. However, it is silly to say someone is fully qualified to take college level biology without a working knowledge of evolution. If the text leaves it out, then the university is RIGHT to reject the school’s qualification.


9 posted on 08/12/2008 6:56:07 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Old, pale and stale - McCain in 2008! but we're only one vote away from losing the 2nd amendment...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This should be a good thread.
10 posted on 08/12/2008 6:58:06 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I’m assuming that textbooks cover a whole lot more than the appearance and change of life forms.

If it is 10% of a textbook (which it isn’t), then these students would get 10% of the answers wrong. That leaves them with 90% of THAT subject. And it is only 1 of many subjects which aren’t affected at all by this issue.

They should not be denied a college education because someone questions 10% or less of their education in one small area of one subject.


11 posted on 08/12/2008 6:59:20 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL

Is UC state or private.

if state then there is a state obstructing the free exercise clause of the first amendment not to mention Calif. constitution.


13 posted on 08/12/2008 7:03:08 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So judges are now experts on writing textbooks and declaring what content is and is not allowed?

incredible.


14 posted on 08/12/2008 7:15:50 PM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
obstructing the free exercise clause of the first amendment...

Is that clause still in there? I thought it was deleted from the Living Constitution long ago. I read every question from BHO's final exams in his Constitutional Law course, and it was never mentioned.

15 posted on 08/12/2008 7:16:10 PM PDT by RogerD (Educaiton Profesionul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the University of California can deny course credit to applicants from Christian high schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible and reject evolution.

What about people who believe in modern mathematics and probability theory (which evolutionism is incompatible with)? They gonna deny them access to UC too?

16 posted on 08/12/2008 7:16:20 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Extra credit would be given to the applicant coming from a muzzie high school.


17 posted on 08/12/2008 7:18:24 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Is UC state or private.

UC is the public university system of the state of California. It is enormous, probably the largest system in the country, with many separate schools: UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Santa Barbara, UC Davis, and on and on.

18 posted on 08/12/2008 7:18:35 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (DEATH TO PUTIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

there’s a reason why people who promote evolution are also in favor of whole language and Everyday Math...


19 posted on 08/12/2008 7:18:47 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obamuh uh uh uh uh uh uh ummmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Almost every private Christian school teaches Evolution alongside Creationism (something the public schools could adapt?). Most private Christian schools realize that a strong knowledge of Evolution is needed to succeed in any secular collage. As a consequence, most Christian primary and secondary students know more about Evolution than their counterparts in public schools, they just know how to discern the difference, based on their Christian beliefs. ;-)


20 posted on 08/12/2008 7:19:23 PM PDT by doc1019 (I was taught to respect my elders, but it's getting harder to find one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson