To: politicallyincarrect; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
Pass it on for comments -— BIG NEWS — AND STATE RIGHTS VICTORY !! -— WAY TO GO TEXAS !!!
In a six - three decision (Justices Breyer, Souter and Ginsburg dissenting) the Supreme Court held that even though the ICJ’s Avena decision “constitutes an international law obligation on the part of the United States,” (emphasis in original) the President lacked the requisite authority to compel States to comply with it.
4 posted on
08/10/2008 8:16:30 PM PDT by
davidosborne
(http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s) to elect Duncan Hunter)
To: davidosborne
94 posted on
08/11/2008 2:54:39 AM PDT by
E.G.C.
(To read a freeper's FR postings, click on his or her screen name and then "In Forum".)
To: davidosborne
Always nice to hear some good news.
108 posted on
08/11/2008 2:40:53 PM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Duncan Hunter was our best choice...Now we are left with a bunch of idiots.)
To: davidosborne
In a six - three decision (Justices Breyer, Souter and Ginsburg dissenting) the Supreme Court held that even though the ICJ’s Avena decision “constitutes an international law obligation on the part of the United States,” (emphasis in original) the President lacked the requisite authority to compel States to comply with it. Mixed decision. While it dismisses authority of ICJ over state matters, it seems to assert that ICJ would have authority over federal executions.
141 posted on
11/28/2008 2:08:50 PM PST by
PapaBear3625
(Question O-thority)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson