Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/07/2008 6:33:11 AM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JACKRUSSELL

Ping!


2 posted on 08/07/2008 6:33:27 AM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

I still don’t care.


4 posted on 08/07/2008 6:37:19 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten
Good article.

Carolyn

5 posted on 08/07/2008 6:38:06 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten; All
From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html

New Pentagon Report: China's Growing Military Space Power
By Leonard David
Special Correspondent, SPACE.com
March 6, 2008

GOLDEN, Colorado — A just-released Pentagon report spotlights a growing U.S. military concern that China is developing a multi- dimensional program to limit or prevent the use of space-based assets by its potential adversaries during times of crisis or conflict.

Furthermore, last year's successful test by China of a direct-ascent, anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon to destroy its own defunct weather satellite, the report adds, underscores that country's expansion from the land, air, and sea dimensions of the traditional battlefield into the space and cyber-space domains.

Although China's commercial space program has utility for non- military research, that capability demonstrates space launch and control know-how that have direct military application. Even the Chang'e 1 — the Chinese lunar probe now circling the Moon — is flagged in the report as showcasing China's ability "to conduct complicated space maneuvers — a capability which has broad implications for military counterspace operations."

To read the entire publication [29.67MB/pdf], go to (U.S. Dept of Defense) :
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Report_08.pdf

Russia, China flex muscles in joint war games
Reuters: Aug 17, 2007

CHEBARKUL, Russia (Reuters) - Russia and China staged their biggest joint exercises on Friday but denied this show of military prowess could lead to the formation of a counterweight to NATO.

"Today's exercises are another step towards strengthening the relations between our countries, a step towards strengthening international peace and security, and first and foremost, the security of our peoples," Putin said.

Fighter jets swooped overhead, commandos jumped from helicopters on to rooftops and the boom of artillery shells shook the firing range in Russia's Ural mountains as two of the largest armies in the world were put through their paces.

The exercises take place against a backdrop of mounting rivalry between the West, and Russia and China for influence over Central Asia, a strategic region that has huge oil, gas and mineral resources.

Russia's growing assertiveness is also causing jitters in the West. Putin announced at the firing range that Russia was resuming Soviet-era sorties by its strategic bomber aircraft near NATO airspace.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-29030120070817?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

From National Public Radio (NPR):
"Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has been visiting countries such as China, Iran and Russia as part of an effort to build a 'strategic alliance' of interests not beholden to the United States. He considers the United States his arch enemy.":
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5729764

9 posted on 08/07/2008 7:00:46 AM PDT by ETL (Lots of REAL smoking-gun evidence on the demonRats at my Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten
the single most important geopolitical event of the 21st century

Since it's only 2008, that's a bit of a stretch.

10 posted on 08/07/2008 7:03:22 AM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten
Would this article read any differently if it had been written for Bob Woodruff by the Chicom government? I'm trying to find differences, but not coming up with any. Can anyone help?

Helping China split into two or three countries would be the best thing we could do for the world.

11 posted on 08/07/2008 7:06:26 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

Someone should put China in it’s place.


12 posted on 08/07/2008 7:08:08 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; TigersEye

Ping


14 posted on 08/07/2008 7:11:32 AM PDT by indcons (People everywhere confuse what they read in newspapers with news. - A. J. Liebling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

The left is hunky-dory with us forging relations with dictators — as long as they’re communist dictators.


18 posted on 08/07/2008 8:09:02 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten
What I really find amazing is not this article, but the responses to this article. This article is not propaganda. It is in fact, what is going on in the world and with China. It is a pragmatic view of a changing world in which China is a part of. And the overriding goal is for them to achieve an American level standard of living.

The propaganda, is the perspective coming from all the postings to this thread. And many others on the FR. The reality is, is that China is NOT participating in Cold War politics by initiating trade with other countries, but many on the FR are when they oppose her trade policies. It is this deep seated desire to contain her regardless of whether or not China becomes democratic. This desire is what brings forth the anti-China propaganda.

23 posted on 08/07/2008 9:14:03 AM PDT by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

I read the fist few replies to this thread and have this comment: you can say what you will, but the Chinese government’s first and last priority is China and Chinese interests. I watched the first half of the show and any hint of whining about “human rights” and the “environment” was brushed off. They are looking out for number one.

Better that the dumbasses in Washington learn from them.


24 posted on 08/07/2008 9:32:27 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson