Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Is Sitting on the Energy Mother Lode ( MAX SCHULZ )
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | July 26, 2008 | MAX SCHULZ

Posted on 07/26/2008 5:33:28 AM PDT by kellynla

Amid the rolling hills and verdant pastures of south central Virginia an unlikely new front in the battle over nuclear energy is opening up. How it is decided will tell us a lot about whether this country is willing to get serious about addressing its energy needs.

In Pittsylvania County, just north of the North Carolina border, the largest undeveloped uranium deposit in the United States -- and the seventh largest in the world, according to industry monitor UX Consulting -- sits on land owned by neighbors Henry Bowen and Walter Coles. Large uranium deposits close to the surface are virtually unknown in the U.S. east of the Mississippi River. And that may be the problem.

Virginia is one of just four states that ban uranium mining. The ban was put in place in 1984, to calm fears that had been sparked by the partial meltdown of a nuclear reactor on Three Mile Island outside of Harrisburg, Pa. in 1979.

Messrs. Bowen and Coles, who last year formed a company called Virginia Uranium, are asking the state to determine whether mining uranium really is a hazard and, if not, to lift the ban. But they've run into a brick wall of environmental activists who raise the specter of nuclear contamination and who are determined to prevent scientific studies of the issue.

The Piedmont Environmental Council is one of the leading opponents. It warns of the "enormous quantities of radioactive waste" produced by uranium mining.

Jack Dunavant, head of the Southside Concerned Citizens in nearby Halifax County, is another outspoken critic. He paints a picture of environmental apocalypse. "There will be a dead zone within a 30 mile radius of the mine," he says with a courtly drawl. "Nothing will grow. Animals will die.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: energy; environmentalism; environmentalists; uranium; virginia; virginiauranium; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2008 5:33:29 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Forty years ago they were busting down mountains in Wyoming and Colorado to get to new uranium ore sources, and more recently causing all kinds of international tensions getting the “yellowcake” out of Africa, and here in the farmlands of southern Virginia, this relatively easily accessible vein was just sitting there.

No harder to get to than limestone from a quarry.

Aren’t we worried about terrorists getting their hands on it?


2 posted on 07/26/2008 5:43:02 AM PDT by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Jack Dunavant, head of the Southside Concerned Citizens in nearby Halifax County, is another outspoken critic. He paints a picture of environmental apocalypse. "There will be a dead zone within a 30 mile radius of the mine,"

The histrionics have already gone nuclear. Why not? It works.

3 posted on 07/26/2008 5:43:21 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (His Negritude has made his negritude the central theme of this campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Fears over using nuclear energy are mostly irrational and being used by others with their own agenda. The technology and knowledge is available to build and operate nuclear plants with no more risk than operating a coal plant. The U.S. needs to develop every energy resource it has to become independent of outside influence.


4 posted on 07/26/2008 6:01:47 AM PDT by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

It would take a lot of refining and enriching to get Uranium ore into anything usable for a weapon. Terrorists are not that industrious.

What this does represent is the enviromarxists denying cheap, safe power to the “masses” the Marxists supposedly care for.


5 posted on 07/26/2008 6:07:37 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“there will be a dead zone within a thirty-mile radius of the mine, nothing will grow, animals will die...”

loaded with leftist lies or the truth?

(have to research it.)


6 posted on 07/26/2008 7:06:06 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor
Fears over using nuclear energy are mostly irrational and being used by others with their own agenda. The technology and knowledge is available to build and operate nuclear plants with no more risk than operating a coal plant. The U.S. needs to develop every energy resource it has to become independent of outside influence.

There is almost nothing in science better understood and more thoroughly studied than radioactivity. Coal contains several parts per million radioactive elements. This amounts to several tons per year per typical coal-fired plant and the wastes are just dumped with no control over them at all, as far as radioactivity goes. In taking uranium from the ground, the area is being made safer and less radioactive than it was and the high level radioactive waste for one year from a nuclear power plant can fit in a space under a card table. And if it weren't for Jimmy Carter's ban on spent fuel reprocessing, that could be reduced even more.
7 posted on 07/26/2008 7:22:04 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

But, but, but, what about the South Central Virginia Spotted Snot Flea?

Save the South Central Virginia Spotted Snot Flea.

It’s more important than electricity.


8 posted on 07/26/2008 7:37:25 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Blaming CO2 for global warming is like blaming your thermometer for your kid's fever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley

Research away. Look at other U mining sites, no dead zones. Heck , lets go extreme, look at the Chernobyl site. Nope, no dead zone there either, lots of plants and animals even after all these years. Not that I would go there to live, mind you, just that life endures.


9 posted on 07/26/2008 7:52:39 AM PDT by RoadGumby (Ask me about Ducky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"enormous quantities of radioactive waste"

Ah, uranium is radioactive, it's already in the ground. How will taking uranium out of the ground create "enormous quantities of radioactive waste". Seems to me, it'll reduce radioactivity in the ground.

We need to revive the word "reactionary", someone who opposes every new activity. It's the liberals, leftists and environomentals, who are the reactionaries of today.

10 posted on 07/26/2008 7:53:43 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (We're screwed '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Nuclear power is the easiest, most reliable means of maintaining the health of our country for the foreseeable future.

It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

As a bonus, we will starve the funding of both the expansion of islam, and its most effective tool, mindless terrorism.
As an added bonus, we will get nutcase Chavez deposed, and probably hanged by his own people.

(Let them eat oil?)

11 posted on 07/26/2008 8:55:32 AM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Jack Dunavant, head of the Southside Concerned Citizens in nearby Halifax County, is another outspoken critic. He paints a picture of environmental apocalypse. "There will be a dead zone within a 30 mile radius of the mine,"

I wish these nutcases would be more thorough in their apocalyptic hysteria. How exactly will this happen? Why is it not happening now?

I have run across these seriously disturbed people before, in harmless, local venues. Why is this nut case getting national attention?

Don't get me started on irradiated food.
We could be saving tens of thousands annually --- fact, but we don't because perhaps there might be "godzillas" created if we eat irradiated food.

Give me a royal break!

12 posted on 07/26/2008 9:00:14 AM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"There will be a dead zone within a 30 mile radius of the mine,"

My uranium mines are in Canada and Kazakhstan. Those countries apparently like the idea of developing natural resources.

13 posted on 07/26/2008 9:04:45 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Reactionary is precisely correct forthe anti-nuke folk.

In the very long ago days they’d have been against fire.

Lotso people died from poorly cntrolled fire.


14 posted on 07/26/2008 9:20:09 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
We need to revive the word "reactionary", someone who opposes every new activity. It's the liberals, leftists and environomentals, who are the reactionaries of today.

You could even go a step further...Luddites.

Feet planted firmly in the way of progress.

15 posted on 07/26/2008 9:45:19 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The irony is that Nuclear and offshore drilling are probably two of the best options for the environment.


16 posted on 07/26/2008 9:49:00 AM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

btt


17 posted on 07/26/2008 9:55:11 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I have worked for a Uranium company and am somewhat familiar with the industry.

The grade in the Virginia deposit is less than .1% uranium oxide. This is the normal low-grade resource found around the planet.

In the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan, the grades run to 20%+ - now that’s dangerously high!

The opposition to this development is mere NIMBYism.


18 posted on 07/26/2008 10:31:32 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

As a kid in the late 60’s, my parents sent me to Camp Pitt, a Christian Church camp in that area. It’s since been relocated and the original site is a uranuium mine. Back then they told us it was the power of the Lord that made the old swimmin’ hole glow at night....


19 posted on 07/26/2008 10:32:18 AM PDT by AndrewB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Thanks for the info.
I hope you'll stay around because I'm sure that the issue of the construction and operation of nuclear power plants will be a priority for some time.

BTW, do you have an opinion of the co-generating nuclear power plants that not only generate electricity but also desalinate water. I think it would be an excellent idea.

20 posted on 07/26/2008 10:49:44 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson