Posted on 07/16/2008 8:54:20 AM PDT by Menehune56
The killer’s pedigree:http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/statistics/deathrow/drowlist/medellin.jpg
From the Catechism:
Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.
If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people’s safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity with the dignity of the human person.
Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities that the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm—without definitively taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself—the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity "are very rare, if not practically non-existent" (Evangelium Vitae 56)."
United States to World Court-After due consideration of your request demanding we put on hold the legally reached decision to end the life of certain individuals who although not USA citizens, have none the less committed the act of murder against an individual or individuals who are citizens of the United states of America, we have reached the following consensus.
GFY
Chief Justice John Roberts is highly amused.
Dear World Court,
Go pound sand, bugger off, and eat ___ and die.
regards,
The People of Texas
The People of Texas
ps: How's the weather there? It's hot here.
Ta-ta
the world court needs a HOWDJA. HOWDJA, HOWDJA, HOWDJA LIKE TO KISS MY A$$
Warhead the World Court!
United States to World Court-After due consideration of your request demanding we put on hold the legally reached decision to end the life of certain individuals who although not USA citizens, have none the less committed the act of murder against an individual or individuals who are citizens of the United states of America, we have reached the following consensus.
GFY
ordered? gmab
These are the same idiots who think that Rumsfeld is a war criminal. [Of course, so do many Democrats like Dick Durbin, Harry Reid, Patty Murray, Barbara Boxer. Question: if you sum their IQs, does it total 100?]
Hey World Court, eat my shorts!
Can we arrange a bombing raid on wherever the World Court is located within The Hague?
Hey Coffee, can you photoshop this and put Old Glory behind him?
Nope. We need to add more of these.
Amen!!!LOL
Hang them now.
“Don’t fret, FRiend. The SCOTUS ruled back in March 6-3 for Texas, and against the Medellin and the `World Court’.”
While a few on this thread are busy praising Bush, which side of this scenario was Bush on? For Texas and execution, or For Medellin?
What happens if next year the World Court decides that Bush, Cneney, and Rumsfeld should be tried for war crimes? How would a President Obama react? Would he extradite them? Maybe someone should pose the question to him.
Fry him...then hang him.........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.