Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold Schwarzenegger dents green credentials with Dodge Challenger
Telegraph ^ | 7/1/08 | Laura Clout

Posted on 07/02/2008 7:52:35 AM PDT by ZGuy

Arnold Schwarzenegger has risked accusations of green hypocrisy by driving around in a gas-guzzling Dodge Challenger Coupe.

The Hollywood star-turned Californian governor has built a reputation as a leading green campaigner and last Friday told a climate-change meeting in Florida: "America is so addicted to oil it will take us years to wean ourselves from it, and to look for new ways to feed our addiction is not the answer."

In an interview last year, the governor spoke of his wish to create "a whole new industry of clean cars and clean engines and components to build those engines."

To this end, he did sell his fleet of Hummers.

But the former actor's green credentials may have been slightly dented after he was spotted driving the coupe in Los Angeles.

The vehicle, which does just 13 miles to the gallon, boasts a 6.1 litre V8 engine and can reach 60mph in under five seconds.

Schwarzenegger, 60, took the car for a spin with his sons Patrick, 14, and Christopher, 10, and his wife Maria Shriver, 52.

The model, an SRT8, is similar to The Dodge Charger made famous by The Dukes of Hazzard television series in the 1970s and 80s.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; greengovernor; schwarzenegger; transportation; trojanhorse; twirp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Sacajaweau

“i can’t even imagine what his wife sees in him.”

Well, could it possibly be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and celebrity to some degree? Does anyone imagine that there would be the same result if Arnold hadn’t been a rich Hollywood star?
Oh, I know the Kennedy name is synonymous with “money”, but I wonder whether or not there are so many of them that the initial load of dough left by their patriarchs has been diluted somewhat. However, the “Kennedy” name is a commodity in itself (dubious in my opinion), so marrying Fort Knox is always an option for anyone with even a drop of the Kennedy blue blood in their veins.


21 posted on 07/02/2008 8:12:34 AM PDT by Twinkie (TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I remember years ago while vacation in Sun Valley, I saw Arnold driving around in a Humvee.


22 posted on 07/02/2008 8:15:33 AM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

"Saving de enviro-ment is for da little peepul."

23 posted on 07/02/2008 8:15:36 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

You people don’t understand. Cars like this are necessary for a guy who hires a private guard for his cowboy boots while he’s staying at the Hyatt across from the Capitol in Sacramento. Now get back into your Yugos and shut up.


24 posted on 07/02/2008 8:16:24 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The road to hell is paved with the stones of pragmatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

Wow! I thought I knew my Charger cinema. So V. Point was a Challenger? Thanks for the tip.


26 posted on 07/02/2008 8:22:06 AM PDT by Mr. Pumblechook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MrB
And that’s what the “green movement” is all about

The 'green' movement was a socialist movement that started in Germany in the 1980s. Corporate America has adopted their philosophy for the subsidies and the control of their consumers... they can ration a product here (like energy) so they can sell it somewhere else,(third world) driving up demand and prices.
27 posted on 07/02/2008 8:23:07 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Pumblechook

I thought the same thing until I noticed that the article was written by a Brit-he probably should get a pass, everything that’s not(or was) a British Leyland all looks the same.


28 posted on 07/02/2008 8:24:55 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Elites don’t concern themselves with little people, so they are unconcerned about comparisons of lifestyle.

This was my position for a while, until I read what CS Lewis had to say about the sin of Pride. The elites' lifestyle isn't going to change if the rest of us continue our lifestyle, and most of them know it. They just want there to be a huge difference, because that fuels their pride.

29 posted on 07/02/2008 8:28:22 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Pumblechook

Vanishing Point featured a Challenger, not a Charger.


30 posted on 07/02/2008 8:30:02 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: ZGuy
The model, an SRT8, is similar to The Dodge Charger made famous by The Dukes of Hazzard television series in the 1970s and 80s.

Huh? Uh, no ... it's similar to a 1970 Dodge Challenger.


33 posted on 07/02/2008 8:39:14 AM PDT by al_c (Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

well, I hope it means he is a fan of musclecars enough to let them keep being sold in California.

I worry greatly about horsepower and the end of the second musclecar era.


34 posted on 07/02/2008 8:42:06 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Pumblechook

Just to further complicate the issue, the made for TV remake of Vanishing Point had both a Challenger and a Charger.


35 posted on 07/02/2008 8:42:12 AM PDT by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: al_c

The 70/71 Challenger was the sister car to the 70/71 Plymouth Barracuda. Slightly different body style except the Challenger had 4 headlights instead of the 2 on the Cuda. The Cuda also had a much “tougher” looking rear end than the “wussy” looking Challenger rear end.


36 posted on 07/02/2008 8:58:32 AM PDT by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I’m shocked at that crappy mileage. My 2500 Suburban (454, 6” lift, 36” tires) gets 13 MPG.


37 posted on 07/02/2008 9:01:00 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

“America is so addicted to oil it will take us years to wean ourselves from it, and to look for new ways to feed our addiction is not the answer.”

No concept of reality at all. A totally useless human being who can only do damage.


38 posted on 07/02/2008 9:03:38 AM PDT by vigilo (Everything I needed to know about George Bush and the Republican Party I learned from CFR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Yes, there were three, I believe, used in the movie...

The actual number seems to be lost to history, but near as I can tell there was either 4 or 5 440 4 barrel cars and one 383 automatic. One of the 440 cars was immediately cut in half for certain camera angles. The 383 car did the towing of the Camaro into the dozers. The rest were beaten to death shooting the movie.

There were no survivors.

Chrysler made sure of that. Word has it that Mother Mopar was so upset by the nudity and the drugs in the movie that they took the cars back and smashed them so that they would not end up in any auto shows.

39 posted on 07/02/2008 9:04:30 AM PDT by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Algore makes Ahnold look like a warm-up act.

In case you’re wondering why Algore requires such a large aircraft, it’s because he takes his ego with him wherever he goes.

Photobucket

40 posted on 07/02/2008 9:06:53 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson