Posted on 06/21/2008 2:35:05 AM PDT by rellimpank
Like a monster in a horror flick franchise, the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), an omnibus treaty originally blocked by President Ronald Reagan, is back! And despite what the doomsday document's delirious spokesmen say, it's about as scary as ever.
The convention is being pushed by a mix of activists, who support international law -- any international law -- and businesses, such as the International Association of Drilling Contractors, that see visions of profits dancing in their boardrooms. Treaty critics are being dismissed as ignorant fools or cynical liars.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
LOST will truly be pushed even harder now that offshore drilling for oil is getting lots of attention.
LOST is just another attempt to rape Americans and pillage our natural resources - arrest them all when they set foot on our soil.
Can't wait to see how hard he pushes for this as opposed to his lukewarm, wishy-washy, support for offshore drilling. If W wants to put the nail in the proverbial Republican coffin, this should do it. PS Don't know if McLame is for this, but off the top of my head, I'd guess yes???
NEW WORLD ORDER
McCain has voiced his opposition to this treaty.
“McCain has voiced his opposition to this treaty.”
Was he for it before he was against it? Because he didn’t show any opposition when he could have.
“John McCain has already incurred serious negatives with patriotic United States citizens with his all-out support for giving amnesty to illegal aliens. Now Accuracy in Media editor Cliff Kincaid points out that McCain has another black mark — his failure to oppose the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) in the Senate. This smack-down of US sovereignty will offend the same group of voters that were incensed about the thankfully failed amnesty. From U.N. Double Talk From Straight Talker McCain:
….The measure, which creates an independent source of revenue for the United Nations, is now pending in the Senate, of which McCain is a member. This is not an obscure or irrelevant issue for him. He could have a big impact on the fate of this treaty, which he has described as providing “a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world’s oceans and seas” and serving “as an umbrella convention under which rules governing all uses of the oceans and their resources are established.”
The treaty creates three new international institutions—the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the International Seabed Authority, and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. U.S. companies would pay taxes or “fees” for access to oil, gas and minerals. But such access would be determined by the treaty organizations, not the weakened U.S. Navy. Testimony shows that it could also affect economic and industrial activities on land.
There is growing controversy over when, or if, the treaty will come up for a full Senate vote. It has passed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee….
Our government is permitting, even encouraging, so many policies which have the potential to destroy the United States, it is hard to tell which one will be our death knell — failure to secure our borders, devaluing citizenship, social engineering through punitive taxation, outsourcing of our critical infrastructure, borrowing money for the Iraq war from China, sacrificing our sovereignty through NAFTA and LOST. But we urge every thinking voter to read Cliff’s article and become informed about this particular danger. Another plus — Cliff has assembled a collection of McCain’s public statements that give a telling picture of what his presidency might be like.”
http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?tag=law-of-the-sea-treaty
BUMP
Like blocking the Russian claim to the North Pole. Yep, that sure rapes Americans.
He has since voiced his opposition to it.
http://www.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/mccain_would_oppose_law_of_the_sea_treaty
In fact it was back in October 2007 when he voiced his opposition to it. Your article dates from January 2008.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/oct/31/mccain-caters-32to-gop-voters/
I’m not sure I understand your point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.