Posted on 06/05/2008 8:15:54 AM PDT by neverdem
I have detested the Clintons ever since I covered the New Hampshire primary in 1992. The man I saw was not the silver-tongued charmer who seems to have bewitched so many people.
Up close, he seemed like a red-cheeked, piggy-eyed bully with a mean streak a mile wide.
And when he lied - which he more or less did for a living - he had a hard-faced little spouse to step into the TV studios to cover up for him.
This woman put up with A LOT from Bill over the years but could always tell herself it was worth it because in the long run the experience would give her the presidency she so obviously deserved.
Advertisement Over the years I watched this gruesome drama - the Clintons using and abusing the democratic process as marital therapy - until, the morning after this year's Iowa caucuses, it finally seemed to be over.
A good friend of mine wrote an exultant article saying Barack Obama had done us the huge favour of moving America into a "post-Clinton" era.
No more would the happy couple be able to inflict themselves on us. We were free from Lanny Davis and Harold Ickes and Howard Wolfson and Hillary's ghastly brothers and all the easy money riff-raff who had benefited from Clinton's last minute pardons.
As I read it I was hit with the queasy realisation I didn't believe a word of it. My friend Congressman Steve Cohen was forced to apologise the other day for comparing the former First Lady to Glenn Close rising from the bathtub in Fatal Attraction.
It's actually been more like a movie about an unkillable swamp creature or lagoon dweller.
And the morning after the last two primaries Lanny Davis was circulating a petition in the Democratic party to attach her to the Obama ticket.
"Good grief," I found myself muttering. "Is there no end to this woman and her overweening ambition?"
Well, THAT was a dumb question and no mistake.
Her performance in New York on Tuesday night was positively flabbergasting. Having won South Dakota, she congratulated that state on having "the last word"- while Montana's results were still being counted.
She congratulated Mr Obama all right but not for having won by securing the majority of delegates.
She let it be known that she would accept the vice presidential nomination without ceasing to count herself a candidate for the Presidential one.
And she demanded - wait for it - "respect" for the 18 million people who had voted for her. In other words, unless she gets a great deal of care and feeding and pampering, 18 million Americans will have been dissed.
The nerve. The nerve is really quite something.
In Washington yesterday, at the same pro-Israel podium at which Mr Obama spoke earlier, Mrs Clinton spoke of the man who has un precedentedly won the nomination as if he was just another Senator, like her, just another friend of Israel, like her.
There was a time one might have expected a Jewish audience to be asked to applaud the choice of the first black American nominee but Mrs Clinton couldn't find it in herself to be quite that gracious.
Indeed, if any one thing has exposed the hollowness and rottenness of the Clintons it is the almost casual way they have ignored their old black friends and allies to pursue a Clintonian version of a white backlash "southern strategy". Nothing is excluded if it serves the cause of the great entitlement.
From 16 years of polemics against this dynasty, I had acquired a huge shelf of anti-Clinton books and even written one myself in an effort to get the poison out of my system. For about 10 seconds after Iowa I thought of tossing them out. But now I think I'll have to hold on to my arsenal. I shall be needing it again.
Perhaps it's a Jaws-type movie I'm trying to think of. Like a Great White Shark, Mrs Clinton will never stop her relentless predations until the very end.
Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair
wow!
I agree completely. She’s not gone until she’s 6 feet under, and even them I’m not so sure. I always said she would not get the nomination, but that doesn’t mean she’ll go quietly. Hell no.
Hitchens needs to watch his back now.
I must admit I enjoyed reading that.
“The nerve. The nerve is really quite something.
“We have seen an X-ray of a very dark soul.”
Michael Goodwin
This insight should have been the silver bullet.
You should read RON BROWN’S BODY...
in that book you will find the real Clintons.
I enjoyed reading it too. And I have a feeling that Mr. Hitchins enjoyed writing it as well.
Hitchens "gets" the Clintons...really "gets" them.
Imus said this morning that Lanny Davis called wanting to get on and push HRCas VP. Imus said "Lanny, don't call, ever!"
i love CH for this!
For those who remember the Clinton presidency, the gall is all too familiar. They always go just a bit farther than we expect from even the Clintons. When she referenced Obama, the words sounded very much to me as though she were praising him for a failing effort. Much the way the victor might congratulate the runner-up for a job well done. That speech was simply stunning.
bump
Where are you listening to Imus on the radio?
Wow! He seems to hate the Clintons as much as he hates Christians.
lol... Sums them up nicely. Someone needs to tell that dysfunctional "family" unit that it is rich enough now to pay for its own private therapy. The American people (and the world) have shared their misery far too long, and are done throwing good money after bad paying for it.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200803050006
SCARBOROUGH: Are you calling — are you calling Obama a shallow and flaky candidate? Do you —
HITCHENS: I’ve repeatedly called him a shallow and flaky candidate, and — though I thought he was an incredibly successful shallow and flaky candidate. I would add other things that are going to now get a second look that they’ve long deserved: this dumb, nasty, ethnic, rock ‘n’ roll, racist church that he goes to in Chicago, that’s going to — he won’t be able to walk away from that anymore. The crummy associates he’s got in Illinois, going on trial for corruption with their Iraqi friends. None of this is going to get the free ride from the press that it was getting until about this time yesterday morning.
SCARBOROUGH: Wow.
Imus has his show based out of WABC. In Boston its on 96.9. It's also on the RFD cable channel.
News Flash to the MSM:75% of Americans don’t like the
Clintons.
And NOW the Bill Clinton we’re treated to is a white haired prematurely open-mouthed and doddering youngish old fool,who seems on the verge on losing his bodily functions, and whose only function left is to act on his wife’s behalf, and his own,just like one of his slavish spin doctors/hit men did 15 years ago. Interestingly, if it weren’t for what we already know about HER character, she has seemed to be getting younger, more congenial, more “viable”, than her tired and jaded husband. It may be too late for her, but I doubt it. I too, like Hitchens, think she’ll be back, and has never really left, and won’t.
I still think she will secure the nomination....somehow....
This brings to mind that old adage: “Be careful of what you wish for....” We all wanted very badly to see the end of the Clinton era and that appears - APPEARS - to be in sight. And look what we have in her place: the most inexperienced, ineffectual nobody that could conceivably be our next CinC. What Hath God Wrought?
bump
THAT'S the Bill I remember!
ping!
That is a picture of a sociopath, if not a psychopath. I realized it the first time I laid eyes on Clinton in 1992, and have known so since. The so-called MSM that foisted the Clintons on America just did again with Obama.
think she’ll be back, and has never really left, and won’t.
I still think she will secure the nomination....somehow....
she didn’t concede..she suspended and is simply now waiting in the wings for something to happen which may or may not be planned..
IMHO, she ain’t out of it, and won’t be out until the convention..at the earliest..
“News Flash to the MSM:75% of Americans don’t like the
Clintons.”
I want to give credit to the MSM for inflicting the Clintons on us. Now they are trying to inflict Obama on us.
“Wow! He seems to hate the Clintons as much as he hates Christians”
True. A guy who hates the Clintons and Mother Theresa does have range.
All those millions he made making speeches has come to an end. That’s one reason he is pissed.
He is spot on and I’ll never understand the overwhelming support she has received from conservatives with short memories. She and Bill are without a doubt the greater of the two evils. I don’t think Obama is the boogy man everyone would like to think he is. He’s got a lot of prominent backers putting it on the ilne for him and that makes him controllable. The Clintons would have absolute power and total free reign.
“SCARBOROUGH: Are you calling — are you calling Obama a shallow and flaky candidate? Do you —
HITCHENS: I’ve repeatedly called him a shallow and flaky candidate, and — though I thought he was an incredibly successful shallow and flaky candidate. I would add other things that are going to now get a second look that they’ve long deserved: this dumb, nasty, ethnic, rock ‘n’ roll, racist church that he goes to in Chicago, that’s going to — he won’t be able to walk away from that anymore. The crummy associates he’s got in Illinois, going on trial for corruption with their Iraqi friends. None of this is going to get the free ride from the press that it was getting until about this time yesterday morning.
SCARBOROUGH: Wow.”
Chris had better watch his 6. He has put himself in danger by speaking the truth about two very dangerous families.
Oh darn, does this now mean that there will be books on ‘inside the crooked Clinton Presidency’ written by those in his cabinet. /sarc
How will the drive-byes balance the anti-Bush administration tirades with the anti-Clinton tirades? They rely on constant repetition in order to drum the message into the numbed mind of the collective. It may become interesting to watch.
I want to recommend another book to you all: “Dereliction of DUTY” by Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson, USAF (Ret.). This book spells out the Clinton’s hypocrisies and power hungry ways pretty well. (It’s written by an Air Force officer stationed in the White House during the Clinton years.)
“She let it be known that she would accept the vice presidential nomination without ceasing to count herself a candidate for the Presidential one.”
The anti-Christ hits the nail on the head right there.
Yes, the Dems have traded the Arkansas machine for the Chicago machine. Congrats to them. They got rid of the liar and his harpy wife and replaced them with... a liar with a harpy wife.
Seems to me they’re going to need the jaws of life to get this sorry creature out of the race.
She isn't done with health care, for example. She has constituencies demanding action on feminist issues such as a Title IX for science curricula and gay issues such as marriage sanction and open membership in the military. She will push gun control because there's political capital in it.
All this will be true whether or not Obama is elected, but especially damaging if he is. And either way she will be driving for the 2012 nomination, even if it means wrecking a Democratic incumbent to get there. Bet on it. She's a long, long way from done.
Come on.
Any other presidential contender would have been conceding the night of that last primary, you know it and I know it.
Remember Mike Huckabee?
Instead she tells us that she will make no decision tonight and now, heh, we are to wait until this Saturday, when it is alleged she shall concede and embrace Obama in fine fashion.
I got a bridge, super cheap and getting renovated soon, to sell real cheap if you believe that.
I see a groundswell of the American public rising up very soon against this duo.
And I can’t stand Obama, that zero in a suit and tie. But I think the Clintons have done real well in this country and since they are not gracious enough to exit with class, we will probably have to kick them to the curb.
I don’t support Hillary, but Obama will be a total disaster. If he wins, I really do think he will be the second coming of that other JC - Jimmy Carter.
I agree with Scarboro: "WOW".
Hitchens hit the nail on the head and drove it right out of the park there.
I may revise my opinion of him.
Bill looked like a piggy-eyed bully when Hitchens was bowing and sucking up to him at the WH too. Hitchens is just proof of the unfaithfulness of the left…
You’re out of your mind. I drank scotch with Hitchens at the Freeper “Treason is the Reason” rally/dinner back in 1998 or so where he was a featured speaker. He gave a scathing speech reflecting on the never-ending disgrace that was the Clinton administration.
After each example of their corruption and dishonesty he cited, he would rhetorically ask the crowd, “Can you eat enough to vomit enough?”
He HATED them since he first laid eyes on them and has never failed to shout it drunkenly from the rooftops.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.