Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Hitchens on how we haven't seen the back of the Clintons yet
mirror.co.uk ^ | 5/06/2008 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 06/05/2008 8:15:54 AM PDT by neverdem

I have detested the Clintons ever since I covered the New Hampshire primary in 1992. The man I saw was not the silver-tongued charmer who seems to have bewitched so many people.

Up close, he seemed like a red-cheeked, piggy-eyed bully with a mean streak a mile wide.

And when he lied - which he more or less did for a living - he had a hard-faced little spouse to step into the TV studios to cover up for him.

This woman put up with A LOT from Bill over the years but could always tell herself it was worth it because in the long run the experience would give her the presidency she so obviously deserved.

Advertisement Over the years I watched this gruesome drama - the Clintons using and abusing the democratic process as marital therapy - until, the morning after this year's Iowa caucuses, it finally seemed to be over.

A good friend of mine wrote an exultant article saying Barack Obama had done us the huge favour of moving America into a "post-Clinton" era.

No more would the happy couple be able to inflict themselves on us. We were free from Lanny Davis and Harold Ickes and Howard Wolfson and Hillary's ghastly brothers and all the easy money riff-raff who had benefited from Clinton's last minute pardons.

As I read it I was hit with the queasy realisation I didn't believe a word of it. My friend Congressman Steve Cohen was forced to apologise the other day for comparing the former First Lady to Glenn Close rising from the bathtub in Fatal Attraction.

It's actually been more like a movie about an unkillable swamp creature or lagoon dweller.

And the morning after the last two primaries Lanny Davis was circulating a petition in the Democratic party to attach her to the Obama ticket.

"Good grief," I found myself muttering. "Is there no end to this woman and her overweening ambition?"

Well, THAT was a dumb question and no mistake.

Her performance in New York on Tuesday night was positively flabbergasting. Having won South Dakota, she congratulated that state on having "the last word"- while Montana's results were still being counted.

She congratulated Mr Obama all right but not for having won by securing the majority of delegates.

She let it be known that she would accept the vice presidential nomination without ceasing to count herself a candidate for the Presidential one.

And she demanded - wait for it - "respect" for the 18 million people who had voted for her. In other words, unless she gets a great deal of care and feeding and pampering, 18 million Americans will have been dissed.

The nerve. The nerve is really quite something.

In Washington yesterday, at the same pro-Israel podium at which Mr Obama spoke earlier, Mrs Clinton spoke of the man who has un precedentedly won the nomination as if he was just another Senator, like her, just another friend of Israel, like her.

There was a time one might have expected a Jewish audience to be asked to applaud the choice of the first black American nominee but Mrs Clinton couldn't find it in herself to be quite that gracious.

Indeed, if any one thing has exposed the hollowness and rottenness of the Clintons it is the almost casual way they have ignored their old black friends and allies to pursue a Clintonian version of a white backlash "southern strategy". Nothing is excluded if it serves the cause of the great entitlement.

From 16 years of polemics against this dynasty, I had acquired a huge shelf of anti-Clinton books and even written one myself in an effort to get the poison out of my system. For about 10 seconds after Iowa I thought of tossing them out. But now I think I'll have to hold on to my arsenal. I shall be needing it again.

Perhaps it's a Jaws-type movie I'm trying to think of. Like a Great White Shark, Mrs Clinton will never stop her relentless predations until the very end.

Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; hitchens; theclintons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
The Mirror is somewhat weird. That's the real title.
1 posted on 06/05/2008 8:15:54 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

wow!


2 posted on 06/05/2008 8:20:02 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you, Jimmy Carter for all you've done to make the world a safer place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"piggy-eyed bully"

THAT'S the Bill I remember!
3 posted on 06/05/2008 8:20:32 AM PDT by NewCenturions (I've got a posthumous crush on Dave Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree completely. She’s not gone until she’s 6 feet under, and even them I’m not so sure. I always said she would not get the nomination, but that doesn’t mean she’ll go quietly. Hell no.


4 posted on 06/05/2008 8:23:09 AM PDT by Huck ("Real" conservatives support OBAMA in 08 (that's how you know Im not a real conservative))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Whoa....

Hitchens needs to watch his back now.

I must admit I enjoyed reading that.

5 posted on 06/05/2008 8:23:55 AM PDT by Allegra (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“The nerve. The nerve is really quite something.

“We have seen an X-ray of a very dark soul.”

Michael Goodwin

This insight should have been the silver bullet.


6 posted on 06/05/2008 8:24:05 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewCenturions

You should read RON BROWN’S BODY...

in that book you will find the real Clintons.


7 posted on 06/05/2008 8:25:16 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

I enjoyed reading it too. And I have a feeling that Mr. Hitchins enjoyed writing it as well.


8 posted on 06/05/2008 8:26:00 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Great post, neverdem.

Hitchens "gets" the Clintons...really "gets" them.

9 posted on 06/05/2008 8:26:06 AM PDT by GOPJ ( World Series - it's how many games are won, not total runs. Same for Hillary's "total vote" crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Lanny Davis was circulating a petition in the Democratic party to attach her to the Obama ticket.

Imus said this morning that Lanny Davis called wanting to get on and push HRCas VP. Imus said "Lanny, don't call, ever!"

10 posted on 06/05/2008 8:26:23 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

i love CH for this!


11 posted on 06/05/2008 8:26:45 AM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

For those who remember the Clinton presidency, the gall is all too familiar. They always go just a bit farther than we expect from even the Clintons. When she referenced Obama, the words sounded very much to me as though she were praising him for a failing effort. Much the way the victor might congratulate the runner-up for a job well done. That speech was simply stunning.


12 posted on 06/05/2008 8:28:49 AM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Christopher Hitchens on how we haven't seen the back of the Clintons yet


13 posted on 06/05/2008 8:28:56 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


14 posted on 06/05/2008 8:29:50 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Seeing the back of, chiefly Brit, seeing the last of.
15 posted on 06/05/2008 8:31:33 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Where are you listening to Imus on the radio?


16 posted on 06/05/2008 8:31:37 AM PDT by Ceoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NewCenturions

PIGGY-EYED BULLY
17 posted on 06/05/2008 8:32:10 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
TRUST ME. LIKE A BAD COLD SORE, SHE’LL BE BACK!
Photobucket

18 posted on 06/05/2008 8:32:59 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (RAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Wow! He seems to hate the Clintons as much as he hates Christians.


19 posted on 06/05/2008 8:33:17 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...using and abusing the democratic process as marital therapy

lol... Sums them up nicely. Someone needs to tell that dysfunctional "family" unit that it is rich enough now to pay for its own private therapy. The American people (and the world) have shared their misery far too long, and are done throwing good money after bad paying for it.

20 posted on 06/05/2008 8:33:52 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson