Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Recession?
IBD ^ | May 30, 2008

Posted on 05/30/2008 6:30:12 PM PDT by Kaslin

Economy: Many (if not most) pundits, economists and policymakers seem to think the U.S. is in a recession. And if polls are to be believed, so do the American people. Funny, the data just don't show it, at least not yet.


We took some shots late in '07 and earlier this year for impertinently pointing out that despite a growing chorus crying "recession," the numbers simply weren't there. Pollyannas, they called us. And shills for Bush's tax cuts.

We certainly recognize that the economy isn't in great shape. There's no ignoring, for instance, that home sales have fallen off the table — down 42% in April from a year earlier, the biggest drop since 1981 — with prices off a whopping 21%.

And of course oil has breached $130 a barrel, a sure sign in the past that recession cannot be avoided. (Oil prices, adjusted for inflation, have never climbed above $40 a barrel without a subsequent downturn.)

Add in depressed household balance sheets, weak consumer confidence, rising mortgage defaults and the lingering effects of last year's credit crunch — plus bearish comments by everyone from home builder Eli Broad to economist Martin Feldstein, whose think tank officially decides when we're in recession — and it's no wonder two out of three Americans believe a slump is at hand and nearly nine in 10 think things will get worse.

And yet, as Ronald Reagan once said, facts are stubborn things.

The fact is that real GDP, viewed on a year-over-year basis, increased 2.5% in this year's first quarter — the same as in last year's fourth. (Year-over-year comparisons, not quarter-to-quarter, are most telling.)

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/30/2008 6:30:13 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If the ‘RATS’ MSM says that it’s so, it must be true. It’s on the “Nightly News” on TV ain’t it? It’s got to be true! Doesn’t it?


2 posted on 05/30/2008 6:34:35 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Funny, the data just don't show it, at least not yet.

Data is plural, so you should state "these data".

So to rewrite ala Ezra Pound, "these data just don't show, at least not yet."

3 posted on 05/30/2008 6:45:10 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

“The data” is not incorrect, regardless of the word being plural.


4 posted on 05/30/2008 6:59:57 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

With gas at $4.00+, there WILL BE a recession. And it will be ugly.


5 posted on 05/30/2008 7:00:29 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

chicken little. Ugly is the nineteen seventies. Do you remember?


6 posted on 05/30/2008 7:04:35 PM PDT by DWC (what do kids know about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

Go do a little research on the inflation adjusted price of gasoline......


7 posted on 05/30/2008 7:36:58 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Liberals learning curves are pretty flat,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'd trust Enron's financial reports more than I trust the key indicators from the bureaucrats in our federal government.

Likely, 99% of the numbers reported by them are as good as can be expected; not perfect by any means, but at least "good 'nuf for 'gubment work." But the headline numbers have been under too much political pressure, for too many decades, and the beauracrats in Washington, D.C. have leaned too far left for far too long, for me to imagine that those numbers are unbiased.

Now and then I read some persuasive analyzes of these numbers, explaining how they push inflation down, maladjust employment and otherwise cook the books. So not only do I not trust them, I find they have both the motive and the means, and the willing press to disseminate their propaganda.

8 posted on 05/30/2008 7:40:56 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

There is a channel that has Nasdaq, Stock Market and job news...the consensus isn’t as bleak as you say....at least not until 2010.


9 posted on 05/30/2008 7:44:37 PM PDT by Kackikat ( are mute points; chaos ensues.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have to eat crow that we are not in an “official” recession, even as I wonder if we would be if the ACTUAL inflation numbers were reported.

Nevertheless, I said we would see negative growth last quarter, and officially we did not. I’m wrong.

I’m sticking to my guns and I believe a recession must come. So far I’ve been wrong. I admit it.


10 posted on 05/30/2008 8:17:01 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What Recession?

The one that Warren Buffett (D), George Soros (D) and Alan Greenspan (D) keep praying for predicting.

11 posted on 05/30/2008 9:00:10 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Actually if you use the real data and not the hedonically, and seasonally adjusted data from the Ministry of Truth that has been changed multiple times since 1980, the recession actually started in the 3rd quarter of 2006 and continues.

For the actual data, go to Shadow Government Statistics ... do a Google search and start using your brain, not the Ministry of Truth’s data.

No one is so blind as those that refuse to see the actual data in front of them when they go to the cash register or the gas pump.

But then the U.S. is in a state of denial about its fiat currency which has only dropped about 40% in value since January 2002.

Or about its ability to pay for all those unfunded liabilities its representatives have promised to its citizens.


12 posted on 05/30/2008 9:19:25 PM PDT by rollin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rollin

I was making a political point, not an economic one. Whether there is a recession or there is not one, the Democrats and their media and business boosters are going to shout that there is one until at least November 5th, 2008.


13 posted on 05/30/2008 9:24:39 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

There’s the problem ... political points... failure to look at the real world and make policy decisions on real data.

A decision made upon bad data is invariably worse than a decision made under uncertainty using the best available data.

Unfortunately, as Alan Greenspan said, the reason he could get away with convoluted and confusing testimony before Congress was that the representatives did not have a clue about what he was discussing ... just a few like Ron Paul had any inkling about economics and their impact. But then what do you expect from a bunch of lawyers? Knowledge ... of course not, they are trained to go for the throat of their opponent and not for justice.


14 posted on 05/30/2008 9:30:47 PM PDT by rollin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rollin
There’s the problem ... political points... failure to look at the real world and make policy decisions on real data.

I don't make policy decisions, sir. But if the men I mentioned in my original post have their way, Barack Hussein Obama and his enablers will be making policy decisions aplenty, almost all of them predictably bad.

That's the political point I was making, and it is self-evidently correct.

15 posted on 05/30/2008 9:41:09 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s an election year and a republican is in the white house.

Expect Grandma eatin’ dog food stories.

It’s all been done before.


16 posted on 05/30/2008 9:54:22 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the one that 100+ oil inevitably wreaks upon even the strongest economies.


17 posted on 05/31/2008 3:24:42 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Obama's a front man. Who's behind him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

go back to ‘91 with the Desert Storm. All the wise pundits were screaming that oil may hit $100 a barrel, triggering another depression. they were wrong. again.


18 posted on 05/31/2008 5:44:48 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Actually in most cases dog food is more expensive than human food nowadays. It will be grandma eating value supermarket lines as this all she can afford and having to feed them to her dog because she cannot afford dog food stories instead.


19 posted on 05/31/2008 5:52:43 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

The datum would be correct. These data is the correct plural. I don’t make the rules, RC.


20 posted on 05/31/2008 11:49:36 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson