Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porn Tax Considered As Solution To Budget Shortfall
Four Points ^ | 5-23-08 | Doug G. Ware

Posted on 05/23/2008 9:40:17 PM PDT by kingattax

LOS ANGELES - California state lawmakers are considering an unusual idea to solve the state's huge budget shortfall: Tax pornography.

The idea was proposed by a state assemblyman, and would impose a 25 percent tax on the production and sales of pornographic videos -- the vast majority of which are made in southern California.

It is unknown, however, how seriously lawmakers will take the idea or how the porn business would deal with the new tax. It is likely, though, that porm-makers would simply pass the cost along to consumers by making pornographic materials more expensive.

However, many economists believe that pornography is an industry with inelastic demand -- meaning market conditions typically don't affect consumers' desire for the product. In other words, it is believed that most porn consumers would continue to buy regardless of how much it cost.

A potential economic downside to the tax proposal is that porn producers could leave California to manufacture and distribute videos in other states that don't impose the tax


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bowchickabow; chatsworth; sanfernandovalley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: kingattax
It is unknown, however, how seriously lawmakers will take the idea or how the porn business would deal with the new tax.

That's just what we need. All of our porn jobs to go overseas. The last profitable American industry and they tax it to death.

What about a 25% tax on Hollywood films? They'll make a fortune.
21 posted on 05/23/2008 10:27:41 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (DRILL HERE. DRILL NOW. PAY LESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Why stop with porn? Impose a 25% across the board tax increase in California. After all, that's what they really want.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

22 posted on 05/23/2008 10:41:59 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice; kingattax; All

What’s to stop the pornographers from moving to Dallas, Des Moines, Denver or Duluth? Are these socialist legislators morons? Are they really trying to drive EVERY industry out of California?


23 posted on 05/23/2008 10:44:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Gives “from my cold, dead hands” a whole new meaning.


24 posted on 05/23/2008 10:44:50 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Thank God for every morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I’ve always said that if Democrats got the chance, they’d tax your a@@.


25 posted on 05/23/2008 10:47:26 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Complacent Americans and Spineless RINO's have allowed this to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

$12 bill a year in services to illegals and no ideas how to cut the budget.


26 posted on 05/23/2008 10:48:37 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Nice to see that when the Dems see a problem, they can find a solution in hand. Which reminds me that the ultimate form of rejection is when your hand falls asleep when you're... Oh never mind.
27 posted on 05/23/2008 11:17:16 PM PDT by Ratblaster (HILLARY 08 Bring Back the Crooked Hillbillies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I would think this “industry” can high-tail it to Nevada or lots of other places pretty quick. I doubt they have much infrastructure — it’s not like their stuff can’t be filmed just about anywhere. Canada likes to subsidize film production - maybe they’ll offer some special tax incentives for pornographers to film around the streets of Vancouver...... or in the snows of the Canadian Rockies!


28 posted on 05/23/2008 11:55:45 PM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Are these socialist legislators morons? Are they really trying to drive EVERY industry out of California?

Yes and Yes.

29 posted on 05/23/2008 11:59:55 PM PDT by calcowgirl (Schwarzenegger and McCain are trying to castrate the elephant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
"I’ve always said that if Democrats got the chance, they’d tax your a@@."

California should tax all sexual activity. This is the ultimate dream activity for govt. bureaucrats. Fixed fee taxes per act - set the scale based upon govt. bureaucrats estimating the degree of pleasure and amount of time required on average for each act. An elaborate "Sex Tax Code" to specify all the detailed permutations of the various taxes. Group sex taxed extra. Masturbation taxed lightly so long as it is reported, but stiff penalties for under-reporting or tax evasion. A special corps of "Sex Inspectors" will be needed to enforce and collect on the new Sex Tax Code.
30 posted on 05/24/2008 12:01:53 AM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

all I can say to that is... yiff yiff!


31 posted on 05/24/2008 1:02:47 AM PDT by Liberty 275
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“Why stop with porn? Impose a 25% across the board tax increase in California. After all, that’s what they really want.”

Why don’t they just do a hold up on the citizens and take ALL their money? That’s what they REALLY want.


32 posted on 05/24/2008 1:16:03 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Porn Tax Considered As Solution To Budget Shortfall

Uh oh - they're screwed!

33 posted on 05/24/2008 1:34:37 AM PDT by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Somehow I can’t help but wondering what Bill Clinton’s great supporter, Larry Flynt of Hustler, is saying right now?


34 posted on 05/24/2008 2:55:41 AM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; Charles Henrickson; mikrofon
They'll call it an XXX-cise Tax.
35 posted on 05/24/2008 3:20:45 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Up the onus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
It is likely, though, that porn-makers would simply pass the cost along to consumers by making pornographic materials more expensive.

Just like any other business.

36 posted on 05/24/2008 3:28:05 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Ronald Reagan used to say (paraphrased):

If it's moving, Democrats want to tax it.

If it slows down, they want to regulate it.

If it stops moving, they want to subsidize it.

37 posted on 05/24/2008 3:30:53 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

CA slut govt. trying to F the porn industry....and in the end (no pun intended) ~ of course the viewers eventually get screwed!!!


38 posted on 05/24/2008 4:03:12 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Through the vatican?
39 posted on 05/24/2008 4:03:14 AM PDT by wally_bert (Tactical Is Still Missing A Chair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Pole Tax?


40 posted on 05/24/2008 4:34:06 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson