OB(H)AMA(S)< Hamas endorsement of Obama >

We are shocked, shocked, to find the media (again) derelict in its duties. Barack Obama has run his campaign with numerous advisors who the campaign would have everyone believe are just not that plugged in to the campaign. Additionally, Obama refuses to divulge who these people are. Inevitably, however, word gets out that Obama has, yet again, surrounded himself with an undesirable.

This time the undesirable is Robert Malley. Coming on the heels of the Obama campaign saying it was “flattered” by terrorist group Hamas’s endorsement, the foreign press -- in this case the London Times -- pointed out Mr. Malley has close ties to Hamas. All the left has been willing to do is point out that the Times is owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Back in February, in fact, the New York Sun pointed out Bob Malley’s close ties to the Obama campaign and Malley’s close ties to Hamas. At the time, however, the mainstream media ignored the story because, well, the Sun is a right-wing paper. Thank God for all the right wing news organizations or we might never have known Obama is getting advice from a man who views Hamas as a legitimate organization.

Obama’s response, like with his grandmother, his preacher, and other advisors who distract from his public image, was simple. He tossed Malley under the bus. What is more troubling, though, is Obama’s willingness to surround himself with people who view Israel as the bad guy. Obama has gone through great lengths to show a pro-Israel campaign face. Behind the scenes Iran and the terrorist gangs of the Middle East see a man who will side with them, or at least turn a blind eye to them, as they wage war on Israel.

At some point the press needs to do its job and start finding out the other Obama “informal advisors” who are telegraphing to terrorists a different message than Obama’s public facade.

The media has willingly joined the Obamanation while ignoring a very troubling trend for the would be savior of America (or is that “Amerikkka”).

Since March, Obama has increased his deficit in the popular vote. Stated another way, Hillary Clinton, despite what you might have heard, has been winning the popular vote since the beginning of March. Likewise, save North Carolina last week, Obama has not won a race since February, except Guam by seven votes.

Right now, Hillary has 51.1% of the popular vote since March 4, 2008, compared to 48.9% of the popular vote for Obama. Obama has, since March 4th, won Vermont, which the Democrat will win regardless, and Wyoming, Mississippi, and North Carolina. John McCain will more likely than not win all three of those. Obama, has been unable to win critical states -- Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana. He has also failed to show up in Michigan for more than 300 days. If John McCain can hold Florida, Indiana, and Ohio, as well as pick up Pennsylvania and Michigan, it will be game over for Obama.

If Hillary Clinton holds up to what polling is showing will be a blow out for her today in Kentucky and West Virginia, she just might win the popular vote overall in the Democratic primary. Luckily for the Republican Party, the Democrats have decided to embrace Obama as their nominee despite the evidence that he cannot win a general election.

Heading to Washington, D.C. on a Monday morning from Atlanta, I took my position in the security line at 7:50 a.m. for a 9:20 a.m. flight. At 9:00 a.m. I made it the security check point. At 9:10 a.m. I made it to the front of the line. Then the TSA agent decided to shift the position of William Pitt the Younger in my bag. On the second go through the machine, the bag got stuck putting me on stand by and four hours late into Washington.

I could not help but think, as I snaked my way through the security line, which ran through baggage claim, up and down a corridor, and through the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport atrium before even getting to the security checkpoint, that the terrorists have won a partial victory. As the pretty blond with the infant tried to figure out what to do with her child’s bottle and the man next to her shoved his contact solution in a zip-lock bag, I was sure they had won a partial victory.

The government tells us that we are safer now. We are in fact more secure. We are also a heck of lot more inconvenienced. And why? Most likely because the government refuses to engage in any sort of profiling lest it be accused of discriminating. Did the eighty year old lady really look like she was going to take out a flight? Did the parents with the three little girls really need to go through the hassle?

The answer, of course, is no. But the government is fairly well intent on ruining the flying experience for all of us so it can never be accused of profiling for those who might be terrorists. I have no idea how much this inconvenience has cost the nation, but I bet the terrorists are happy.

Obama has gone through great lengths to show a pro-Israel campaign face. Behind the scenes Iran and the terrorist gangs of the Middle East see a man who will side with them, or at least turn a blind eye to them, as they wage war on Israel.

Jeepers, that's putting it mildly. I am astonished Obama gets so much uncritical adulation from Democrat voters, not to mention so much Jewish support, for the following reasons:

(1) Evidently Hamas endorses Obama because they believe he's "one of them." They must know something about Obama that we do not know — which the American mainstream media evidently do not want us to find out. Fortunately, there is the foreign press.
(2) If elected, Obama would be the first president in U.S. history to hold dual citizenship, American and Kenyan.
(3) Obama has a large family back in Kenya, many brothers and sisters and other close family relations. His Kenyan family includes some very high muckety-mucks of the Luo tribe, which is Muslim, and the Kenyan ruling class more generally. Obama is formally Luo and Muslim through his father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.
(4) Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.'s sister (Obama junior's aunt) is the mother of Raila Odinga, a Muslim activist who was defeated in the Kenyan presidential contest last December. Odinga claims the election was stolen from him. So he is mounting an insurgency against the duly-elected Kenyan government, on the Somali — and also the Hamas/Hezbollah — model. (They all use the same "playbook.") If successful, among other things Odinga (who spent his college years in East Germany learning how to be a good communist) promises to institute Sharia law in all of Kenya, even though only 12 percent of Kenyans are Muslim.
(5) This insurgency uses violence to attain power. Last New Year's Day, adherents of Odinga burned down a Christian church filled with parishioners. Scores of people died — mainly innocent women and children of the Kikuyu tribe (historically they are a Christian tribe). The largely Muslim Luo regard the Kikuyu as their natural enemy. There has been increasingly widespread murder and mayhem perpetrated against this people, as well as any other people who do not share Odinga's radical vision of Kenya's future.
(6) Our very own Obama — the very guy who's running for the presidential nomination of the Democrat Party — has been aiding and abetting his first cousin, Odinga. He has published editorials in the Kenyan press, and has given speeches at Kenyan universities, charging the Kenyan government with "corruption." (One gathers that, on Obama's view, that government must be corrupt since Odinga is not now leading it.) Worse, it's been reported that our very own darling Obama so far has raised something like $1 million dollars in funding for Odinga's insurgency, some fairly substantial amount of this money his own.
(7) Once a Muslim, always a Muslim is the rule of Islam. Obama claims to have converted to Christianity. But that ought to make him a sitting duck for the execution of a fatwa. But somehow I doubt we'll see that: For I suspect the Islamic world considers him one of their own and just "lying" about his religious conversion to advance his cause — which sort of lying is perfectly legitimate and acceptable in Islam. (Rev. Wright is supposedly a Muslim convert to Christianity himself. So where's the fatwa on him? Again, I would suggest that Hamas knows much more than we do about the reality "on the ground" WRT both Obama and Wright.)

Just for the fun of it people, go google "Raila Odinga" and see what you come up with....

When I did that, I began to suspect that the Obama candidacy is a concerted psychological attack on the American people that is perfectly convenient and agreeable to Islamofascists everywhere.

But I'd love to hear the views of other FReepers who have done their googling of Odinga.... Let's compare notes, get a "reality check"....

Thank you so much for this post, kellynla.

FReeper Beckwith compiled The Obama File:

http://www.theobamafile.com/

http://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/02/barak-obama-questions-about-ethnic.html

excerpt:

Here is the truth about Mr. Obama’s name, and his father’s ancestors:

True Negro tribal members of western Kenya where his father was born have Christian names, not Arabic. His father’s decision to name him with an Arabic name is a matter of his father establishing his ethnic identity in Africa - it is done deliberately to separate him from the African tribes. He may live among them, but he is not one of them. His father’s message is that he is Arabic, not Negro.

Many will find these truths unsettling. I’m often asked, “But I thought his father was Kenyan. How could Mr. Obama not be African-American, how could his ethnic composition be so Arabic?”

The definitive clue to that answer is to look at his name, his father’s name, and the names of all his ancestors on his father’s side. They are all Arabic.

Researching his roots reveal that on his father’s side, he is descended from Arab slave traders. They operated under an extended grant from Queen Victoria, who gave them the right to continue the slave trade in exchange for helping the British defeat the Madhi Army in southern Sudan and the Upper Nile region...

You’re missing the big picture.

What we're talking about here is "coalition politics." I think that's the "big picture" in a nutshell. That's when various seemingly different ideological systems decide to join forces for a time to defeat a common enemy. (The understanding being that they can always sort out their differences later, after the common enemy is dead.)

The "common enemy" is the United States of America; or more fundamentally, the very idea of a political system premised on the ultimate value of the individual human person enjoying his God-given, natural liberty under a political system founded on the ideas of the sovereignty of the people and equal law, equal justice, for each and every person.

The contending ideological systems in play here are Marxism (Ayers, Dohrn); Black Separatism (as enshrined in Black Liberation Theology -- Wright, Cone, and let's not forget Farrakhan here), and Islamofascism (Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaida, et al.).

All use identical methods to extend their power. But each has a different rationale for their respective bids for power. With the Marxists, it's class struggle. With the Black liberation theologians, it's racial struggle. With the Islamofascists, it's religious struggle.

"Struggle" is the common operative word in all three cases. To the extent that America is equally demonized by all three ideological systems (and brainless Oprah just haplessly feeds into all of these as the source of everything that's wrong with the world on her enormously popular TV show), these various strains of what amounts to total social anarchy sooner or later are willing and happy to work together.

The dirty little secret of each of these ideological systems is that, at bottom, each is an exercise in nihilism. Now nihilism is the devil's work (so to speak). Which is why America must be regarded as The Great Satan -- to conceal the real mission, and to innoculate its practitioners by accusing the other side of doing what it, itself, is doing -- and was organized to do from the get-go.

Time for the sleepwalkers to wake up!!!

If at all possible. The Lotus Eaters of the Odyssey preferred not to "wake up," their dreams being ever so much more enchanting to them than "real life."

Thak you so very much for writing, marron!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.