Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Hit By Earthquake
Drudge Report ^ | Updated:08:00, Monday May 12, 2008 | Sky News

Posted on 05/12/2008 12:27:28 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe

An earthquake measuring 7.8 on the Richter scale has hit China's Sichuan province. The tremor was felt across the entire region - shaking buildings in the capital, Beijing, as well as the Thai capital, Bangkok, and Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam. US Geological Survey said the quake struck 57 miles north-west of the city of Chengdu at 2.29pm local time (6.28am GMT).

Some 10 million people live in Chengdu.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: asia; china; chinaquake; earthquake; eq; quake; sichuan; usgs; wenchuan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,501-1,549 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2008 12:27:28 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bd476; Ezekiel

ping


2 posted on 05/12/2008 12:28:01 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

2 major natural disasters in a short time. Scary. Prayers to all.


3 posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:32 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

7.8 is quite high. However, I don’t know the region in China that it hit that well. But if there was shaking all way from Beijing to Hanoi... it’s gotta be a big one. Hope it struck somewhere where there’s not a lot of people . . . then again it is China.


4 posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:37 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Oops, should be 2 natural disasters. Delete the “major.”


5 posted on 05/12/2008 12:30:03 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

How about “major natural disasters”.


6 posted on 05/12/2008 12:32:01 AM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

Like the cyclone disaster, reports of injuries and deaths will be slow in coming out.


7 posted on 05/12/2008 12:33:21 AM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

After taking a look at Chengdu, China, it does appear the epicenter was located near a mountain range in central China, not too close to any major population centers. We can hope for the best.


8 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:09 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

9 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:17 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
7.8 is nearing 'Great Quake' status on Richter.

This one could be very bad indeed.

10 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:56 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

With the southern section of the San Andreas fault being 150 years overdue for a bigone and the Hayward fault ready to slip, I would not want to be anywhere near California anytime soon.


11 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:13 AM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

This page seems to be useful determining how close the epicenter was to population centers. It’s from the USGS.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager/events/us/2008ryan/index.html


12 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:28 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edmond246; peggybac

I don’t know much about earthquakes at all. But this sounded big.

Drudge is slow on the details. I checked Yahoo news, and didn’t find any new info.


13 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:38 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

And finally, my last bit of looking at the USGS site indicates around 21,000 people in the ‘extreme exposure zone’.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager/events/us/2008ryan/index.html#shakemap


14 posted on 05/12/2008 12:38:43 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Thanks.


15 posted on 05/12/2008 12:39:06 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

The violent doesn’t sound too cool either. And that’s what, 86 thousand?


16 posted on 05/12/2008 12:42:20 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

That’s what it appears to be. However, I am currently attempting to find the same population map for other significant earthquakes. However, I cannot seem to find it. Using past maps, I was thinking we can get an estimate on how accurate these maps are in predicting damage, and so forth. Your welcome, by the way, the more information we have the better we can look at the whole picture. :-)


17 posted on 05/12/2008 12:46:01 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080512/ap_on_re_as/china_earthquake

Update here. I guess we’ll have to wait and see how accurate it is.


18 posted on 05/12/2008 12:46:53 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edmond246
That particular region of China -- Sichuan Province -- hit by this quake is by far the most populated of all provinces in that nation.

This is an older population map of China, but you can see that the density of people in Chengdu is greater than anyplace else:

cHINA POPULATION AND DENSITY MAP

The buildings there are typically very old or of suspect construction if they're modern. It's not a particularly modernized province. The effects of this quake could be dreadful.

19 posted on 05/12/2008 12:47:28 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Also appears, there has been an aftershock. Mag. 6; same area.


20 posted on 05/12/2008 12:47:51 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Earthquake in China, PING.


21 posted on 05/12/2008 12:49:07 AM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

This report says the epicenter was in a rather remote area:

Breaking News

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1315695,00.html

China Hit By Earthquake
Updated:08:32, Monday May 12, 2008

An earthquake measuring 7.5 on the Richter scale has hit China’s Sichuan province.
The tremor was felt across the entire region - shaking buildings in the capital, Beijing, as well as the Thai capital, Bangkok, and Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam.

Quake hit near ChengduUS Geological Survey said the quake struck 57 miles north-west of the city of Chengdu at 2.29pm local time (6.28am GMT).

Some 10 million people live in Chengdu.

An eyewitness said people flooded out of buildings, but there was no sign of damage or injuries.

The area where the quake lies on the eastern edge of the Tibetan plateau, where mountains rise sharply and the population density is generally thin.

A magnitude 7.5 earthquake is considered a major event, capable of causing widespread damage and injuries in populated areas.

In the Taiwanese capital of Taipei, 100 miles off the southeastern Chinese, buildings swayed when the quake hit. There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage.


22 posted on 05/12/2008 12:49:42 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama: My 1930s Foreign Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Social Policy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Thanks for the info. Check out the link on post 18 where they say the pop. is very thin and so far there are no reports of widespread injuries or damage.


23 posted on 05/12/2008 12:52:07 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Chengdu has a population of 11 million, per Wikipedia. I don’t know much about earthquakes, but this sounds like it could be bad...


24 posted on 05/12/2008 12:52:30 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246
Also appears, there has been an aftershock. Mag. 6; same area.

Photobucket

25 posted on 05/12/2008 12:53:39 AM PDT by Doofer (Carl Cameron Is A Weasel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Thanks.

Place-Saver for later...

I’m off for the night.

Prayers and God speed to those effected.


26 posted on 05/12/2008 12:56:39 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Well, Chengdu is a major city, for sure. But it sounds like the city itself avoided the worst of it, so maybe it won’t be too bad in terms of damage.


27 posted on 05/12/2008 12:56:50 AM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Oh my. 100+ Million people in that province; if my sleep deprived eyes aren’t lying to me. I appreciate the research into the area. I hope to find out more when I wake up. Thanks.


28 posted on 05/12/2008 12:56:54 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
Looking at the coordinates on Google Earth significant populations are less than 4 miles away.

There's going to be massive damage.

But for the Grace of God go I.

29 posted on 05/12/2008 12:57:19 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

My first thought was of the extremely rapid construction cities like Chengdu have seen in the last decade, and how they may not be up to “code”. Let us hope that doesn’t play out that way...


30 posted on 05/12/2008 12:59:26 AM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DB

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/05/12/china.quake/

This link tells of the damage near the epicenter due to the shallowness and also the population. Ditto what you said.


31 posted on 05/12/2008 1:02:10 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

That CNN article has entirely the wrong population for the city. It’s over 10 million, not 2 million. Maybe someone heard it wrong.


32 posted on 05/12/2008 1:05:25 AM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul

Really. I have no idea. But thanks for your input. I’m sure you’re more accurate than CNN. NOT being sarcastic.


33 posted on 05/12/2008 1:07:18 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul

Sky news says over 10 million as well. I think it will be a little while before we find out the extent.


34 posted on 05/12/2008 1:10:39 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
and of course China will lie about the extent of the damage and death

.

35 posted on 05/12/2008 1:20:04 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Been there and would not want to be there in a 7.8 quake. If there is signicant damage - and I can’t imagine how there would not be - it would not be the easiest place to leave.


36 posted on 05/12/2008 1:20:39 AM PDT by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Great link. Thanks.


37 posted on 05/12/2008 1:22:15 AM PDT by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

It looks like I got something wrong with the coordinates (decimal conversion) and that the nearest significant population is about 15 miles away.


38 posted on 05/12/2008 1:29:20 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
The only bright side I can see is that currently the whole country is mobilized for the Olympics. Perhaps it will be easier to route aid to the needy areas? One can hope.
39 posted on 05/12/2008 1:38:14 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

CNBC now reporting “deaths and injuries and a school collapsed”....

Earlier ‘nothing to see here’ reports seem to have been somewhat optimistic.....


40 posted on 05/12/2008 2:02:46 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Sometimes I sets and thinks, and sometimes I jus' sets.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

wonder if the great dam project held up.....any tusami effects on that huge lake?


41 posted on 05/12/2008 2:03:53 AM PDT by spokeshave (Hey GOP...NO money till border closed and criminal illegals deported)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

There was a post on FR a couple of weeks ago that talked about the damn and its ability to withstand a 6.x quake. Perhaps someone can find it. I looked but could not.


42 posted on 05/12/2008 2:41:40 AM PDT by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Here’s the last one I felt... I remember I was dreaming (it was about 1am)... and it woke me up fast... I remember going from dream scene and it flashed a bright white (my waking up point). I clung to my sheets (shaken side to side for about a minute or so)... I could hear my heartbeat... slow but heavy :/
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqinthenews/2008/us2008rtbu/#details


43 posted on 05/12/2008 3:11:16 AM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Forgot to mention that I live on the 1st floor of a 3 story apartment complex X(


44 posted on 05/12/2008 3:14:54 AM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe; bd476

Earth a quakin Ping please.


45 posted on 05/12/2008 3:48:04 AM PDT by Global2010 (Waiting for Hillary to pull the Rabbit outa the Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

CNBC just reported - headline only - “900 students buried”


46 posted on 05/12/2008 3:50:21 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Sometimes I sets and thinks, and sometimes I jus' sets.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Uncle Ike

Pics just now coming into US tv News....does not look good.
(I had the sound down so did not hear the report)


48 posted on 05/12/2008 3:58:10 AM PDT by Global2010 (Waiting for Hillary to pull the Rabbit outa the Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

BBC saying the same thing. It’s early and news takes awhile to get out even in open societies; but I suspect this will be a case where the western media, rightly critical of Burma for soft-pedaling news of the cyclone disaster, will enthusiastically support China’s efforts (Olympics are less than 3 months away) to do the same thing.


49 posted on 05/12/2008 4:00:46 AM PDT by Heatseeker (To err is human, but to really screw up it takes the Berkeley City Council)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

On my 48th Birthday the earth shook. /sarcasm.


50 posted on 05/12/2008 4:03:06 AM PDT by Global2010 (Waiting for Hillary to pull the Rabbit outa the Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,501-1,549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson