Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leading Conservatives Astray
Chip Wood's Straight Talk Newsletter ^ | 5 6 2008 | Chip Wood/Jack McManus

Posted on 05/06/2008 8:59:30 AM PDT by Dick Bachert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
As I repair to the EPA approved Ready Room to don my asbestos Hazmat suit, let the flames commence.

But PLEASE let up on the name calling long enough to supply specific instances where the author is in error with any of this!

1 posted on 05/06/2008 8:59:30 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Basically we have a Bircher accusing the entire conservative movement from Bill Buckley on down of being part of a huge Marxist conspiracy.

One of the reasons why the Birchers have always been and will always be considered a lunatic fringe group.

2 posted on 05/06/2008 9:07:51 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Yup, the Neocons are the trojan horses of the GOP.

To name a few:

Fred Barnes
Bill Kristol


3 posted on 05/06/2008 9:08:33 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Even though there isn’t a practicing jew among the herd of neos, their shills will soon be screaming “anti-semite.”

Political correctness is part of the neos playbook.


4 posted on 05/06/2008 9:08:35 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (The republic is over kids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Charles Krauthammer a neoconservative? Not that I’ve ever observed. Unless he is refering to another columnist that I am unaware of.


5 posted on 05/06/2008 9:08:37 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("...If it moves, tax it, if it moves faster, regulate it, if it stops, subsidies it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

GIVE US SPECIFICS RE. ERRORS IN HIS REMARKS!!

Name calling won’t get it this time.

I am the granfather of 6 kids who will live as serfs to the state.

There is far too much at stake


6 posted on 05/06/2008 9:10:13 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I see conservatism as something that I’ve made completely my own. I’m a creationist/evolutionist, wishy washy on the death penalty, strong opponent of abortion, favor developing our own oil fields and alternative fuels (minus subsidies), want real results from schools before giving them money, oppose runaway outsourcing of jobs, and am vehemently opposed to illegal immigration.


7 posted on 05/06/2008 9:10:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Bogus argument. There is no solid definition of a neocon. Sometimes its the joooooos (Kristol, Pearl) who promoted war against the arabs, sometimes it’s Bush his blueblood old republican lineage. Sometimes its Cheney and Rummy, who have been center-right republicans since time began, sometimes its the young whipper-snappers like Rich Lowery and Laura Ingraham who grew up as Reagan brats. It’s whatever fits the author’s attempt to demonize who they don’t like.


8 posted on 05/06/2008 9:12:09 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

BTW, I suspect you will have trouble finding those “errors.”

The speed with which you responded would almost certainly indicate that you DID NOT READ THE SPEECH!

Clever boy, you imported it into Word and searched for “Birch,” didn’t you. And that’s ALL you had to see.


9 posted on 05/06/2008 9:14:04 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY
(Michael Brown)

Oh we’re meeting at the courthouse at eight o’clock tonight.
You just come in the door and take the first turn to the right.
Be careful when you get there, we’d hate to be bereft,
But we’re taking down the names of everybody turning left.

‘Cause we’re the John Birch Society, the John Birch Society,
Here to save this country from a communistic plot.
We’re the John Birch Society, help us swell the ranks.
To get this movement started, we need lots of tools and cranks.

Now there’s no one that’s certain that the Kremlin doesn’t touch.
We think that Westbrook Pegler doth protest a bit too much.
We only hail the hero from whom we got our name.
We’re not sure what he did, but he’s our hero all the same.

Oh, we’re the John Birch Society, the John Birch Society
Socialism is the “ism” dismalist of all.
Join the John Birch Society, there’s so much to do,
Have you heard they’re serving vodka at the W.C.T.U.

Well you’ve heard about the agents that we’ve already named,
Well M.C.A. has agents that are flatly unashamed,
We’re after Rosie Clooney, we’ve gotten Pinky Lee,
And the day we get Red Skelton won’t that be a victory!

For we’re the John Birch Society, the John Birch Society,
Norman Vincent Peale may think he’s kidding us along,
But the John Birch Society knows he spilled the beans:
He keeps on preaching “brotherhood,” but we know what he means!

We’ll teach you how to spot ‘em in the city or the sticks,
‘Cause even Jasper Junction is just full of Bolsheviks.
The CIA’s subversive, and so’s the FCC.
There’s no one left but thee and we, and we’re not sure of thee.

Oh we’re the John Birch Society, the John Birch Society
Here to save our country from a Communistic plot.
Join the John Birch Society, holding off the Reds.
We’ll use our hands and hearts, and if we must, we’ll use our heads.

Friends, do you want Justice Warren to be your Commissar?
Do you want Mrs. Khrushchev in there with the DAR?
You cannot trust your neighbors, or even next-of-kin
If mommy is a Commie then you gotta turn her in.

Oh, we’re the John Birch Society, the John Birch Society
Fighting for the right to fight the right fight for the right
Join the John Birch Society, as we’re marching on,
We’ll all be glad to see you when we’re meeting in the John,
In the John, In the John Birch Society!

The Chad Mitchell Trio, Kapp Records #457, 1962


10 posted on 05/06/2008 9:14:24 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Hard to argue with his description of the origins of Neo-Conservatism. We are now into the second generation of Neo-Conservative leaders. Irving’s son, William, is among the leaders. He is editor of the Weekly Standard, which can sort of be thought of as the official journal of Neo-Conservatism.

I think defining Neo-Conservatism as “New Deal + Aggresive Militarism” is pretty realistic.

The problem is that the Socialists have won. The Constitution Party won’t win 1% of the vote. The only candidate who clearly wasn’t a neo-conservative in this election (on the R side) was Ron Paul.

Ron Paul was widely ridiculed by not just the leftist press, but the so called Conservative New Media (Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt) for his traditional conservative views such as a non-interventionist foreign policy, dislike of the inflationary Federal Reserve system, and desire to end popular social programs and replace them with capitalism.

A real conservative can not be elected in the USA today. So we will continue to get various versions of leftism on both sides: Democratic Socialist vs. Compassionate Conservative (Socialist) Radical Redistributionist Socialist vs. Neo-Conservative (Socialist), Racial Justice Socialist vs. Center Right Democratic Socialist “Maverick” (Socialist).


11 posted on 05/06/2008 9:15:04 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Gee, THAT was brilliant.

If you can unplug your Ipod and switch off American Idol long enough, do try to conjure an ORIGINAL THOUGHT just this once.

There’s a nation at stake here, funny man.


12 posted on 05/06/2008 9:16:34 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

CITE SPECIFIC ERRORS IN THE SPEECH!


13 posted on 05/06/2008 9:17:31 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Start with line one, and work your way to the end. that about covers it.

Tancredo and Hunter both support our “foreign adventurism” against the terrorists and they are more conservative then the entire membership of the John Birch Society combined, and not “neo” in any way, shape or form.


14 posted on 05/06/2008 9:19:57 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Militant socialists is all they are.


15 posted on 05/06/2008 9:20:55 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (The republic is over kids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Bogus argument. There is no solid definition of a neocon. Sometimes its the joooooos (Kristol, Pearl) who promoted war against the arabs, sometimes it’s Bush his blueblood old republican lineage. Sometimes its Cheney and Rummy, who have been center-right republicans since time began, sometimes its the young whipper-snappers like Rich Lowery and Laura Ingraham who grew up as Reagan brats. It’s whatever fits the author’s attempt to demonize who they don’t like.I disagree. Neo-Conservatism is a movement. It has a history, it has founders, it has a specific ideology. You are the one who is attempting to confuse the issue. The author clearly identified the founders, and several of us have mentioned the same individuals as the leading figures in it today. As I mentioned the Weekly Standard is the NeoCon journal.

As I explained in my previous posting NeoCon is no longer a little side movement of Conservatism, it's the main stream. The old-school Conservatives are the odd remnant, and not taken seriously.

No one except you brought up "the Jews". It is a silly attempt to attach a bogus charge of anti-semitism to those of us who are critical of aspects of neo-conservatism. Many prominant critics of Neo-Conservatism are also Jews.

Stop stirring the pot to create confusion and address the article, please.

16 posted on 05/06/2008 9:21:50 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
GIVE US SPECIFICS RE. ERRORS IN HIS REMARKS!!

He's not giving us facts.

He is giving us a list of highly-tendentious suppositions about people based on unsourced snippets of quotes.

Name calling won’t get it this time.

The article you posted is essentially one long exercise in name-calling: "Everyone who does not tow the Bircher/CP line is a socialist!"

I am the granfather of 6 kids who will live as serfs to the state.

Good thing your grandkids are not drama queens like yourself.

There is far too much at stake

To be led down conspiracy-mongering rabbit holes by Birchers? Absolutely.

17 posted on 05/06/2008 9:21:53 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

While there is a sad truth in your observation, I’d remind you and those reading this thread that a “communist” is simply a “socialist” who owns and enjoys using a firearm — on other human beings.

Think for a moment about your remarks in the context of where we go once these elitists have taken away OUR weapons — and/or neutralized our abilty to resist them with them — and the state has the only weapons.

Ask the Jews of Europe — or the Ukranians under Stalin — or...

You get the idea.

All of that begs the question “DARE WE STOP RESISTING THEM?”


18 posted on 05/06/2008 9:23:18 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

SPECIFICS instead of NAME CALLING!


19 posted on 05/06/2008 9:24:20 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

More brilliance from wideawake.

Suggest you change your screen name to “fastasleep.”

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


20 posted on 05/06/2008 9:26:11 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (INCENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson