Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigative Project Releases Gov't Memos Curtailing Speech in War on Terror
Investigativeproject.org ^ | May 2, 2008 | Steven Emerson

Posted on 05/02/2008 1:17:44 PM PDT by freerepublic_or_die

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is refusing to identify the "influential Muslim Americans" and "leading U.S.-based scholars and commentators on Islam" who met with Secretary Michael Chertoff in helping shape a softer approach to government lexicon about terrorists and their ideological motivations.

"Our policy is we don't comment on the Secretary's private schedule," spokeswoman Amy Kudwa told the IPT. Nor would she identify any of the participants' organizational affiliation.

DHS and the State Department's Counterterrorism Communications Center each issued reports urging government employees to avoid words like "jihad," "mujahedeen" or any reference to Islam or Muslims, especially in relation to Al Qaeda. The Investigative Project on Terrorism is making the documents available for the first time here and here.

As we reported last week, the memos say a change in language from the U.S. government is needed to win the hearts and minds of moderate Muslims and avoid glamorizing terrorists motivated by religious ideology. "Moderate" is also frowned upon in the memos, though, with "mainstream" or "traditional" suggested as replacements.

Among the recommendations not reported previously: • "The experts we consulted debated the word ‘liberty,' but rejected it because many around the world would discount the term as a buzzword for American hegemony."

"The fact is that Islam and secular democracy are fully compatible – in fact, they can make each other stronger. Senior officials should emphasize that fact." • The USG [U.S. government] should draw the conflict lines not between Islam and the West, but between a dangerous, cult-like network of terrorists and everyone who is in support of global security and progress.

(Excerpt) Read more at investigativeproject.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; dhs; moonbatagenda; pc
The memos say a change in language from the U.S. government is needed to win the hearts and minds of moderate Muslims.
The first mistake is the premise that there is anything moderate about Muslims, really, moderate Muslims,an oxymoron if I'd ever seen one.
1 posted on 05/02/2008 1:17:44 PM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

More disinformation for us poor Dhimmis, from the link:
So America, after serving for more than two centuries the sanctuary for huddled masses yearning to breathe free, is being asked to minimize liberty against fanatics bent on a global religious state. The memo doesn’t offer examples to show where Islam and secular democracy have reinforced each other, or explain how Shariah law, the imposition of religion into state affairs, is “fully compatible” with secular democracy.

It is no surprise, however, to see the changes praised by the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC):
MPAC has long promoted a nuanced approach towards the lexicon of terrorism emanating from the United States government and media. It is essential that various elements of the government recognize the importance of decoupling Islam with terrorism. Furthermore, using Islamic language to describe terrorists falsely bolsters their religious credibility among the very people we most need — the majority of mainstream Muslims around the world.


2 posted on 05/02/2008 1:28:41 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is refusing to identify the "influential Muslim Americans" and "leading U.S.-based scholars and commentators on Islam" who met with Secretary Michael Chertoff in helping shape a softer approach to government lexicon about terrorists and their ideological motivations.
Where's Pelosi, Reid, Murtha, Clinton, Obama... ?
3 posted on 05/02/2008 1:32:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

“the majority of mainstream Muslims around the world.”

LOL! Good to see the IPC following the guidelines recommended by using “mainstream” instead of “moderate”.

“Curtailing speech” my butt.


4 posted on 05/02/2008 1:42:22 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die
The first mistake is the premise that there is anything moderate about Muslims, really, moderate Muslims,an oxymoron if I'd ever seen one.

You've said it all right there. Supposedly, the Islamos who are trying to shut talk show host Michael Savage up and deny him his First Amendment rights are "moderate" muzzies. I guess when "extremist" means flying planes full of innocent people into buildings full of innocent people, "moderate" would put you on the scale in the vicinity of Adolf Hitler, Attila the Hun and Ghengis Khan.

5 posted on 05/02/2008 1:48:54 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America! It looks like it's all downhill from here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Headline?

"We were hijacked. True Nazis just want a socialist paradise."

Washington, D.C. May 2, 1942. A leading German hometown association (HTA) demands FDR stop maligning all Nazis.
The German hijackers of our socialist dream should be called criminal cross-border aggressors, says HTA. . . Americans of German origin said to fear some German HTAs. . . .

6 posted on 05/02/2008 1:51:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die
the U.S. government is needed to win the hearts and minds of moderate Muslims and avoid glamorizing terrorists motivated by religious ideology.

Just a couple of decades ago it was: "The U.S. government needs to show the Soviet Union moderates that we want to help them lest we play into the hands of the Communist hard-liners, there will be war and it will be our fault." I've seen this "movie." But I think Hollywood is changing the ending for this new release.

7 posted on 05/02/2008 1:59:00 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die
IMHO, Islam is not compatible with the US nor with Western Civilization. We should not accommodate Islam in any way.
8 posted on 05/02/2008 2:43:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie (McCain will offer battle to Islam - The Obamabeast will offer our heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson