Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indictment Revises Charges Against Mohamed, Megahed (Goose Creek)
TBO.com ^ | 4-17-08 | Elaine Silvestrini

Posted on 04/17/2008 3:11:08 PM PDT by STARWISE

Twelve days before they were scheduled to go on trial, two former University of South Florida students are facing new charges handed up by a federal grand jury.

The new seven-count indictment adds terrorism and weapons charges against one of the defendants, Ahmed Mohamed. It also includes a new charge against Mohamed and Youssef Megahed relating to the devices found in the trunk of their car when they were arrested Aug. 4 in South Carolina. It replaces a two-count indictment handed up last year.

Experts say the new indictment shows the prosecution trying to ensure success at trial by offering jurors alternative avenues to convict.

Stetson University College of Law professor Charles Rose said that when prosecutors do this, it usually means there is "either a weakness in the case they're shoring up or additional evidence has come their way."

The indictment, Rose said, "reads to me like a prosecutor has now had an opportunity to develop some additional evidence and has figured how to make it stick."

"When you look at this indictment, there's more holes than cheese," said Jonathan Turley, who teaches at George Washington University Law School and who is currently representing former USF professor Sami Al-Arian in his terrorism case. "The indictment on its face seems to be a bit of overreaching based on the known facts. The indictment presents a far more sinister picture than what has been reported publicly.

"When it comes to explosive devices, the government has a long history of creative engineering theories," Turley added. "If you take any house at random, the government can usually make out a case for a potential explosive device based on its contents."

Some of the new charges against Mohamed are similar to a charge lodged against another former USF student, Karim Moussaoui, who was recently convicted of possessing a firearm in violation of his student visa. The charge, which carries a maximum of ten years in prison, relates to an incident in which Moussaoui visited a Tampa firing range with Megahed and held a gun for 2 minutes, posing for pictures.

Another Gun Violation Alleged

Prosecutors have alleged that Mohamed, who is also on a student visa, visited the same firing range on another date in July. Megahed is a legal, permanent resident and is allowed to possess a firearm.

"Moussaoui's conviction was viewed as laughable by most defense attorneys," Turley said. "Most prosecutors would never have charged that crime, never mind have forced a trial. The prosecutors are simply trying too hard in these cases to come up with anything that can be viewed as a crime."

Megahed and Mohamed are scheduled to go on trial April 28 on one of the charges, illegally transporting explosives. Mohamed is scheduled to have a separate trial on a charge he tried to help terrorists by posting on the Internet a video in which he showed how to use a remote-controlled toy to detonate a bomb.

Defense attorneys disagreed on whether the new indictment should affect the trial schedule, with Megahed's lawyer expecting no effect and Mohamed's lawyer expecting a delay.

Megahed and Mohamed both are newly charged in the indictment with possessing a destructive device. The new indictment also includes the charge from the previous indictment of transporting explosive materials.

New Charge Of Aiding Terrorists

Mohamed also is newly charged with providing material support to terrorists, and possessing a pistol and a rifle in violation of visa guidelines. The new indictment also contains the charge in the previous indictment against Mohamed of teaching and demonstrating the use of explosives with the intent to help terrorists.

One new charge against Mohamed accuses him of carrying a destructive device while providing material support to terrorists on Aug. 4, the day of the men's arrest. Attorneys have said that the video Mohamed is accused of posting on YouTube had been removed by that day. It's unclear how prosecutors think Mohamed was helping terrorists on that date. That is the most serious charge in the indictment, carrying up to a life sentence.

Megahed's attorney, Adam Allen, said the new indictment will have little effect on his client.

The new charge, he said, is the same as the old charge, and both carry a maximum possible penalty of 10 years in federal prison and a minimum of probation.

The new indictment, he said, "shows that after a year of investigation by the FBI, they have absolutely no new evidence of any wrongdoing by my client."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: goosecreek; jihadinamerica; megahed; mohamed; terrortrials; usf
Twisted irony of these cretins: modern technology used to film the making of explosive devices to show on youtube to help terrorists, while advocating a cult that orders life in the Dark Ages for their followers or else death. Freedom is their F word .... gotta eliminate them.

"When you look at this indictment, there's more holes than cheese," said Jonathan Turley, who teaches at George Washington University Law School and who is currently representing former USF professor Sami Al-Arian in his terrorism case. "The indictment on its face seems to be a bit of overreaching based on the known facts."

Jonathan Turley: you're cheesy. This is like Hillary Clinton working on the defense of the Black Panthers in the 70's. America hating wretches.

1 posted on 04/17/2008 3:11:09 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: girlangler

FYI


2 posted on 04/17/2008 3:13:35 PM PDT by MizSterious (The Republican Party is infected with the RINO-virus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I still laugh every time I see “Megahed”.....


3 posted on 04/17/2008 3:17:25 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Stop By The FReepathon, Help Keep The Lights On.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
Remember these guyz?

South Carolina Ping

Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.

4 posted on 04/17/2008 3:38:14 PM PDT by upchuck (Who wins doesn't matter. They're all liberals. Spend your time and money to take back Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
"When it comes to explosive devices, the government has a long history of creative engineering theories," Turley added. "If you take any house at random, the government can usually make out a case for a potential explosive device based on its contents."

Right ...

stupid *&%**!# lawyer

5 posted on 04/17/2008 3:45:08 PM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Photobucket

Megahed Indicted.

6 posted on 04/17/2008 4:57:21 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
The new seven-count indictment adds terrorism and weapons charges against one of the defendants, Ahmed Mohamed. It also includes a new charge against Mohamed and Youssef Megahed relating to the devices found in the trunk of their car when they were arrested Aug. 4 in South Carolina

I thought those "devices" were just "fireworks". Guess the evidence must show otherwise to add the terrorism and especially weapons charges.

7 posted on 04/17/2008 5:04:52 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy
Turley added. "If you take any house at random, the government can usually make out a case for a potential explosive device based on its contents."

While that's pretty much true, the house contents generally aren't property mixed to become an explosive and assembled into tubes.

8 posted on 04/17/2008 5:07:18 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

And here I thought I was giving you a heads up!!!

Then I pick up a link to this thread from another (where I pinged you) and find you already pinged me. Somehow I missed yours, but we must be on the same wavelength.

I haven’t been on FR much lately, been very busy and not feeling well. But I want to thank you for thinking of me every time you do, because you know I want to read these.


9 posted on 04/17/2008 7:54:35 PM PDT by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
"Moussaoui's conviction was viewed as laughable by most defense attorneys," Turley said. "Most prosecutors would never have charged that crime, never mind have forced a trial. The prosecutors are simply trying too hard in these cases to come up with anything that can be viewed as a crime."

I see little humor. In fact, I applaud the prosecutors for doing exactly what I expect from them, with my tax-dollars.

Turley and his ilk have turned our legal system into a joke, seldom representing justice. I am on to their hypocrisy - they won't hesitate to use any lie or inflamatory comment to get the pond scum free and do bad. That prosecutors use the remains of a discredited and tortured process to do good is indeed praiseworthy. It is much more merciful than I would allow.
10 posted on 04/17/2008 10:06:12 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus (I am the town square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson