As far as evolution is concerned, they, and their moldering opinions, are just more detritus on the scrap-heap of an uncaring universe.
But since you brought it up, where is the fossil-record of the hundreds-of-millions of years of "evolving" eyes? Evolution posits that it took 300-450-million years for eyes to evolve.
Where is the 200-300-million year long fossil record of "partially evolved" eyes?
And given that those eyes need a circulatory system to sustain them, a nervous system to operate them AND the circulatory system, a respiratory system to oxygenate the circulatory vehicle, a musculature to operate the eyes- circulatory-and-respiratory systems, and a skeletal systemn to house it all (exo-or-endo, it matters not), how did all of this eveolve in the first place?
Hmmmmmm...., mutually interdependent, inextricably interwoven systems of unspeakable complexity.
Each of which systems require all of the others in order to exist and to function... especially vis-a-vis the eybeall.
Either they all "evolved" into being at once in an as yet un-hinted-at simultaneous "BIG EVOLUTIONARY BANG", or they were designed and created.
The bloodstream coudn't have evolved first and then waited around for a musculature, respiratory and nervous systenm to evolve for it to work with. The same is true of each of the others.
If the "EVO" scientific community (or its brain-dead acolytes) were able to see the noses on their faces, they would realize and admit this very simple and obvious conundrum.
They might even let the absence of any fossil-record of hundreds-of-millions of years of partially evolved eyes give them a hint.
But, it seems eyes only really work best when one uses them to look, not just to see; and there are none so blind as those who simply refuse to see.
I await your cleverly pointless religion based reparté.
;-/
But since you brought it up, where is the fossil-record of the hundreds-of-millions of years of "evolving" eyes? Evolution posits that it took 300-450-million years for eyes to evolve.
Where is the 200-300-million year long fossil record of "partially evolved" eyes?
Creationist claim CB301: The eye is too complex to have evolved.
Creationist claim CB921.1: What use is half an eye?