Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Charitable Giving is to Clinton Charity
townhall.com ^ | April 4, 2008 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 04/04/2008 10:28:36 PM PDT by kellynla

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign released their tax forms from 2000-2007 Thursday, which showed the Clintons earned more than $100 million in that time period and donated $10 million of that to their own charity.

The Clinton campaign reports donating $10,256,741 to the CFF between 2000 and 2006. During that time, CFF dispersed $2,530,100 in money to other charities and causes.

The names of other persons who donated to the CFF are not required to be disclosed.

Over the years, the CFF gave $80,000 to the Clinton Birthplace Foundation Inc., $20,000 to the Shakespeare Theatre, $40,000 to the School of the American Ballet, $5,000 to the YMCA of Martha’s Vineyard, $10,000 to Amnesty International.

The CFF also donated money to the Immanuel Baptist Church in Shackelford, Arkansas, Georgetown and Yale each year.

CFF lost a significant amount of money in the last two tax reporting years. CFF claimed $4.3 million assets on their 2005 IRS 990 forms. CFF reported much less, $255,890, on their most recent 2006 tax forms. It is not immediately clear from reading the forms where the money went or why assets were lost.

During that time, the Clintons removed themselves as senior officials of the foundation on their tax forms and moved CFF headquarters.

The 2005 tax returns show the foundation’s address as P.O Box 937 Chappaqua, New York—the city which the Clintons keep their New York home. The next year’s tax forms lists the CFF address as in Salinas, California.

On the 2005 forms and those from previous years, Bill Clinton was listed as CFF President, Hillary Clinton has the title of secretary/treasurer and daughter Chelsea Clinton was “director.” The 2006 tax forms list Gloria Clinton as CFF CEO and Manager, Erlinda Valdez as secretary and Catherina Hillman as treasurer.

Gloria Clinton was paid $252,500 according to the 2006 returns for her work that year.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: charity; clinton; fundingtheleft; giving; philanthropy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Not that any of this matters...Clinton is toast. Obama will win the Primary and lose the General election.
1 posted on 04/04/2008 10:28:36 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The 2005 tax returns show the foundation’s address as P.O Box 937 Chappaqua, New York—the city which the Clintons keep their New York home. The next year’s tax forms lists the CFF address as in Salinas, California.

LOL

2 posted on 04/04/2008 10:32:29 PM PDT by GOPJ (The new Wall Street game: Privatize profits and socialize losses.Freeper Mad_Tom_Rackham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Kinda like Gore, living high on the hog and swilling more energy use than a couple dozen others - says that okay because he buys Carbon Credits. But those credits are from his own company. Out of one pocket into the other.


3 posted on 04/04/2008 10:32:57 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“Not that any of this matters...Clinton is toast. Obama will win the Primary and lose the General election. “

Why would Clinton stay in? Perhaps she has a knife that she’s waiting for the right time to use?


4 posted on 04/04/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It is not immediately clear from reading the forms where the money went or why assets were lost.

Par for the course around the Clintons.

5 posted on 04/04/2008 10:35:04 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

to be fair, only 10% of their charity money went to the Clinton charity group.


6 posted on 04/04/2008 10:37:01 PM PDT by Kleebo151
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I swear these Lefties actually believe that the rest of the world is as gullible as their minions...and you KNOW the only reason they paid a third of their income in taxes is so no one would criticize them on how much they paid in taxes when the little wife ran for POTUS...
Ol’ Abe had it right, “you can fool all of the people some of the time...” well you know the rest! LOL


7 posted on 04/04/2008 10:37:40 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Well,come on now, These awards aren't cheap.

The Bill Clinton Feel Good Noscar goes too...

8 posted on 04/04/2008 10:38:54 PM PDT by OeOeO (maybe I didn't come over on the Mayflower, but I got here as soon as I could" Anton Cermak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Why would Clinton stay in?

if she pulls the plug now, hillary is looking at a isht pile of campaign debt which she would personally have to make good on. she can still raise money to pay it off if she keeps the 'campaign' going.

9 posted on 04/04/2008 10:40:46 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Well, it is said that "Charity begins at HOME" - right?

So if they just move it from one pocket to another do they get the TAX Deduction for it?

That to me is the most important question!!

10 posted on 04/04/2008 10:46:38 PM PDT by prophetic (I'm not afraid of calling his full name: Obama's full name is BARAK HUSSIEN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
“Why would Clinton stay in?”

ego...

these white trash care about no one and nothing but themselves...
and of course this is her ONLY shot at being POTUS...
she blows this and she'll have to settle for being the U.S. Senator from NY. Which ain't bad considering she was sorry excuse for a lawyer to begin with who wouldn't be where she is today if not for her draft-dodging husband.

11 posted on 04/04/2008 10:52:07 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151
to be fair, only 10% of their charity money went to the Clinton charity group.

Are you sure? From the article:

the Clintons earned more than $100 million in that time period and donated $10 million of that to their own charity.

12 posted on 04/04/2008 10:53:24 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
CFF claimed $4.3 million assets on their 2005 IRS 990 forms. CFF reported much less, $255,890, on their most recent 2006 tax forms.

Am I reading this right? $4 million disappeared in 2006?

-PJ

13 posted on 04/04/2008 10:54:20 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

“to be fair?”

to be “fair?”

To be “fair”, Bill Clinton should have served two years in the military instead of dodging the draft not once, not twice but three times...and to be “fair” should have been LOCKED UP for dodging the draft! Now that’s being “fair!”
And Mrs. Clinton should have been disbarred for her actions while being employed by the U.S. attorneys’ office during Watergate! And that’s just for starters...to be “fair!” LOL


14 posted on 04/04/2008 10:57:42 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

“Clinton should have been disbarred for her actions while being employed by the U.S. attorneys’ office during Watergate!”

Correction: make that while she was employed by the House Judiciary Committee.


15 posted on 04/04/2008 11:01:53 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
CFF lost a significant amount of money in the last two tax reporting years. CFF claimed $4.3 million assets on their 2005 IRS 990 forms. CFF reported much less, $255,890, on their most recent 2006 tax forms. It is not immediately clear from reading the forms where the money went or why assets were lost.

"Am I reading this right? $4 million disappeared in 2006?"

Don't ask me. I have trouble enough balancing my checkbook. LOL
16 posted on 04/04/2008 11:10:20 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Am I reading this right? $4 million disappeared in 2006?

That's how I read it. And if they haven't explained it... then it seems like that ought to trigger some sort of activity report by the bank.

17 posted on 04/04/2008 11:20:33 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I wonder what all those people who donated to the 'Clinton Defense Fund' are thinking about today. I think I heard a long time back by Bruce Lindsey that the average donor was giving around $96.00 then. That sounds like Joe LunchBucket and not wealthy people.
18 posted on 04/04/2008 11:27:50 PM PDT by Jay Howard Smith (Retired(25yrNCO)Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay Howard Smith
“I wonder what all those people who donated to the ‘Clinton Defense Fund’ are thinking about today.”

“think?”...you're assuming facts not in the record. LOL

The majority of registered ‘Rats don't think,
like the Blacks & Jewish who vote “D”
“if” they actually “thought” about the party they have been voting for all these years they would know they've been making a series mistake...the ‘Rat party doesn't give a bloody damn about anyone or anything but getting elected.
What party and candidate for POTUS is for the Palestinians and against the Jewish in Israel? anyone? anyone? Ferris?
And what has the ‘Rat party done for Blacks other than try to keep them on the “dole” for the past 150 years. After all, the KKK 'Rat party was against freeing the slaves to begin with!

19 posted on 04/04/2008 11:38:59 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The majority of registered ‘Rats don't think,

They dont think of Politics. They dont pay attention. I have four sisters, who, just like zombies, go to the polls and vote straight Democrat ticket because our parents (God bless them as they have been gone for 35+ years) did it. The Dems are for the little people, doncha know..?..!

20 posted on 04/05/2008 12:47:26 AM PDT by Jay Howard Smith (Retired(25yrNCO)Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson