Skip to comments.
Serbia - Serbian government collapses over EU and Kosovo
The Economic Times ^
| March 8, 2008
Posted on 03/08/2008 7:46:54 PM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: doc1019
Columbia vs. Venezuela
Spain vs. Basque guerrillas
To: canuck_conservative
Thanks, Im relieved
sanity restored. Out of the thousands of conflicts in or volatile world, there are two that are not raghead related. Thanks again.
22
posted on
03/08/2008 8:57:20 PM PST
by
doc1019
(God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
To: doc1019
To: GAB-1955
It’s either that or partition.
24
posted on
03/08/2008 9:03:46 PM PST
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: outofstyle
Tell him he’s full of shit.
25
posted on
03/08/2008 9:04:59 PM PST
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: canuck_conservative
26
posted on
03/08/2008 9:14:56 PM PST
by
doc1019
(God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
To: doc1019
Actually I meant to say, There are more? ;-)
27
posted on
03/08/2008 9:17:40 PM PST
by
doc1019
(God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
To: doc1019
someone give me and example of a conflict in todays world that doesnt involve the ROP? Red China vs. Nationalist China (getting ready to boil over post Olympics), Tamil Tiger terrorists vs Sri Lankan government (Mostly Buddhists some Hindis).
28
posted on
03/08/2008 9:21:05 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Well, that is three out how many world conflicts?
the math leaves me with only one conclusion
allah, the false god of the ROP is the cause of most of the worlds problems.
29
posted on
03/08/2008 9:31:06 PM PST
by
doc1019
(God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
To: doc1019
Well, that is three out how many world conflicts? Actually the two in #21 and my two add up to four. As far as out of how many, how many that involve the ROP do you count?
30
posted on
03/08/2008 9:55:50 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?)
To: HAL9000; Bokababe; zagor-te-nej; Lion in Winter; Honorary Serb; jb6; Incorrigible; DTA; ma bell; ...
When the Clintonistas are running the place, burning it isn’t a bad option!
31
posted on
03/08/2008 9:56:27 PM PST
by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: FormerLib
You openly condone the burning of U.S. Embassies. It’s disgraceful, whether or not you agree with the official policy.
32
posted on
03/08/2008 10:06:09 PM PST
by
HAL9000
("If someone who has access to the press says something over and over again, people believe it"- B.C.)
To: HAL9000
You are aware that these things happen when no other option is available.
You would probably call the Boston Tea Party disgraceful as well. As far as I’m concerned, there is no difference. Powers that Be take a dump on you, and you look for a symbol to burn.
33
posted on
03/08/2008 10:21:59 PM PST
by
The Black Knight
(I don't care who's running this year, I'm voting for Reagan...)
To: HAL9000
Its disgraceful, whether or not you agree with the official policy.I have noticed a fair amount of treason on these Balkan threads. It is no wonder God has punished them with almost 1500 years of continuous massacre. The last good government they have had were the Roman Emperors.
34
posted on
03/08/2008 10:40:28 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
35
posted on
03/08/2008 10:49:36 PM PST
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: montyspython
The fact is that many posters on Balkan threads are posting as partisans of one or another of these states, and are making few arguments from the point of view of US national interests. That is obvious from their emotional, often obscene, sometimes scatalogical (as in your case) postings.
36
posted on
03/08/2008 10:57:55 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?)
To: HAL9000
"It's their choice - the EU or Russia."EU Bloc wants to absorb the whole Warsaw-Pact minus Rooskies and OPs .
EU won't let Turkey in because it is Islam. Is Albania in EU? It is mostly Islam also, no?
So, EU wants Yugoslavia minus Islam Kosovo province. Yugoslavia has always been independent commies (non Warsaw-Pact allignde), like Albania (ChiCom alligned). EU divides up all Yugoslavia and absorbes pieces into EU.
Only Serbia/Kosovo are left. EU tells Milosavec to let Kosovo go and join EU socialists. This conniving has been going on since before EU socialists convinced Klintoon to do their dirtywork on Milosavec.
So, EU gives Islamomafia Kosovo independence and wants Serbia in EU.
Where am I wrong?
yitbos
37
posted on
03/08/2008 11:03:30 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
The problem is that US "interests" in the region are a paradox with regards to the WOT.
US interests do not justify it's criminality, if the US wishes to continue supporting terrorists who seek to kill Americans then perhaps the US' interests are ilconceived and Americans with the intellectual capacity beyond that of your average trailer trash would recognize a stupid foreign policy decision and tell the government that it has indeed recognized it as such and to tell the government to stop engaging in said policy.
Simply put, the US is governed for the people by the people and if the elected officials continue to conduct policy against the interests of its own constituency, then just maybe it has no one else to blame the next terrorist attack on it's own soil except on the government itself. Piss on American "interests" if it wants to shoot itself in the foot.
38
posted on
03/08/2008 11:43:23 PM PST
by
montyspython
(Love that chicken from Popeye's)
To: montyspython
The US is a representative republic. The people elect the government, and the government governs in what it considers to be the best interests of the people. The people are free to judge these decisions on election day. The people who disagree can argue to change the policy or to change the government at the next election. Efforts to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the US (as determined by the government) is treason.
39
posted on
03/09/2008 12:27:43 AM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?)
To: montyspython
http://exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=17527&IBLOCK_ID=35&PAGE=5
War Nerd dissects Condi and all the Dhimmis in the State Dept.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson