Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton’s superdelegates rejecting pleas to switch [rejecting Pelosi’s plea that lawmakers not..]
The Hill ^

Posted on 02/26/2008 5:44:40 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Clinton’s superdelegates rejecting pleas to switch By Alexander Bolton Posted: 02/26/08 08:08 PM [ET]

House Democrats supporting Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) are rejecting Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (Calif.) plea that lawmakers not overrule voters should they be in a position to decide who will be the Democratic presidential nominee.

Acrimony gathering inside the party has spurred some Democrats to begin discussing reforming the nominating process and perhaps getting rid of superdelegates altogether.

Many Clinton backers representing districts that voted for Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) say they are not likely to change their mind should the contest come down to the superdelegates — the 796 Democratic lawmakers, governors and officials who may determine the nominee.

Those lawmakers say they should be able to vote however they want, even if it means giving the nod to the candidate who wins fewer delegates from more than 50 election contests conducted prior to the nominating convention. One member said the only way he wouldn’t vote for Clinton is if he died.

“I am a delegate, I’m a supporter of Hillary, I’m supporting who I’m supporting,” said Rep. Diane Watson (D-Calif.), even though 62 percent of the Democratic voters in her district backed Obama.

Such devotion worries some party officials who say record turnout and excitement over Democratic candidates could fizzle if voters feel their voices do not count.

Democrats supporting Obama, who has a lead among pledged delegates, agree with Pelosi that superdelegates should follow the “decision of the American people” and line up behind whichever candidate has amassed the most pledged delegates by convention time.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2008election; botox; california; demagogicparty; election2008; hillary; nancypelosi; obama; pelosi; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; superdelegates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
More popcorn please!
1 posted on 02/26/2008 5:44:45 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If the superdelegates put Clinton over the top and she loses in November, some Congresscritters may find themselves out of a job come next primary season compliments of angry Obama backers.
2 posted on 02/26/2008 5:46:52 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"Super delegates"

Some pigs are more equal than others...


3 posted on 02/26/2008 5:47:33 PM PST by bannie (clintons CHEAT! ALLLLLWAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

They would be FOOLS to do so.


4 posted on 02/26/2008 5:47:47 PM PST by greccogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

YESSS!!! Elementary Ms. Watson!!!


5 posted on 02/26/2008 5:48:07 PM PST by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Super delegates are independent, and as such are not bound by any rules requiring them to support any specific candidate, regardless of the outcome of any vote.

Nancy Pelosi is saying she wants to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Much like Hillary is suggesting, regarding the seating of delegates in Michigan and Florida.

This just gets better and better! Takes some of the sting out of getting stuck with McCain.

6 posted on 02/26/2008 5:50:19 PM PST by airborne (For ENGLISH, press '1' . For SPANISH, hang up and learn ENGLISH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

At the rate the Dems are going, their convention hall in Denver will have a hot enough roof to fry it on!

I’m starting to think there’s not enough popcorn on the planet to last until then.


7 posted on 02/26/2008 5:51:11 PM PST by Kieri (Midwest Snark Claw & Feather Club Founder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They are so stupid. The whole point of the Superdelegates was that if the primary voters were stupid enough to pick another McGovern, the party leadership and people who “know better” would be able to fix the problem before they went down to defeat.

Now that they have that situation developing, to reject the Superdelegates begs the question, why even HAVE them?

Of course, Hillary has shown her ability to screw up even a winning message. She should be pointing out that it takes a majority of delegates to win, and if neither candidate gets a majority, then it IS up to the superdelegates to decide.

She should clearly pledge to support Obama should he win a majority of delegates, but clearly state she will not give up until he does, and that until someone gets a majority, they are NOT the winner.


8 posted on 02/26/2008 5:51:42 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Every day this continues makes me a happy camper.

And please, Democrats who complained about the "unfairness" of the election in 2000, and 2004, and how your votes didn't count and how you just hated hated hated the Electoral College... please, could y'all spin this for us?

Could ya explain how it really is a great thing that this time is somehow different and the fact that Hillary may subvert the democratic process is a good thing now, but how it wasn't in 2000 or 2004?

9 posted on 02/26/2008 5:53:13 PM PST by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This is absolutely delicious!
10 posted on 02/26/2008 5:53:58 PM PST by CAluvdubya (A good man has come home to San Diego! Thank you Congressman Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Those FBI files sure paid off!


11 posted on 02/26/2008 5:56:15 PM PST by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If Hillary is nominated, she’ll be our next president. Republican feminists, members of the majority of Catholics and other groups have indicated that they would vote for Hillary in the general. Many will refuse to vote for McCain, if Hillary is nominated.

If Hillary is our next president, our military forces will shrink, and our enemy will enlarge very quickly. Iran will have more than enough international Islamo-fascist support to attack.

Elect Hillary, and give us “neo-cons” a real war. ;-)


12 posted on 02/26/2008 5:56:54 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

lets see how fast the race card is pulled on this.....


13 posted on 02/26/2008 5:57:10 PM PST by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Diane Watson- treasonous to the day she takes her last breath.

Maybe it’s time the Super Delagates are sent packing for good.

The public should elect the candidates, and the Electoral College should perform it’s function after the November election.

There is a reason why the founders of the country set things up like they did.

The Demorats just wander all over the map with rules, don’t they?
No wonder parents cannot give their kids a consistent message, when the publicity of this kind of behavior is what they learn from.


14 posted on 02/26/2008 6:01:53 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Any word on how many $$$ Winston has been donated by the C’s?


15 posted on 02/26/2008 6:06:53 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyop

“If Hillary is nominated, she’ll be our next president. Republican feminists, members of the majority of Catholics and other groups have indicated that they would vote for Hillary in the general. Many will refuse to vote for McCain, if Hillary is nominated.”


If Hillary is nominated by what Obama supporters deem to be chicanery, it will depress Democrat turnout in November (espacially among blacks) and McCain will win quite comfortably.

I hope Hillary can win in OH, TX and PA and gets to the RAT Convention close enough to Obama in pledged delegates that she wins the nomination by (A) getting the FL and MI delegates seated, (B) getting the lion’s share of the superdelegate vote or (C) a little from column A, and a little from column B. I want to see Democrats getting dragged by their hair through the streets of Denver as cries of “Racism!” and “Sexism!” fill the air. After that, the Democrats would be lucky to get 45% of the vote.


16 posted on 02/26/2008 6:08:59 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

espacially = especially


17 posted on 02/26/2008 6:09:31 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: greccogirl

I wonder if they can get any of those “Selected Not Elected” signs left over from FL in 2000.
What a bunch of dopes.


18 posted on 02/26/2008 6:11:10 PM PST by Holicheese (Beware your friendly air defenses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Where is that old dusty sign that reads:

Selected, Not Elected!

I need to go steal one from a DUmmies, dust it off and get ready make them eat it.

19 posted on 02/26/2008 6:15:49 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Hillary Clinton - It's OBAMAS Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m going to buy stock in Orvil Redenbacher and Land of Lakes. I love buttered popcorn. LOL


20 posted on 02/26/2008 6:17:09 PM PST by blueyon (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson