Objectively, sexual license is actually anti-freedom, because it’s chief social effect is to weaken the family, thereby tilting the balance of social control from parents to the state.
This is why sex is the one area in which the modern American fascists ostensibly support freedom.
I’m sick of ‘left’ and ‘right’: the seating arrangment in the French National Assembly is irrelevant, and the actual usage since about 1920 has been ‘left’ = ‘supports international socialism’ (whether of the sort with the Comintern at its head, or of the ‘let the UN decide, let’s make the world a copy of Sweden’ sort), and ‘right’ = ‘opposes international socialism’. A usage whose ambiguity (Nazis are ‘right’ since they oppose the international aspect, free-traders are ‘right’ since they oppose the socialist aspect) only serves the interests of the left (which does seem to have a precise meaning).
I agree that the promotion of sexual indiscriminateness (it’s not “freedom”)
has the goal of destroying the family. The further goal is to destroy the traditional society and culture.
The ASSes (authoritarian secular socialists) want to impose THEIR version of a society on everyone, but they know that if the people are given the choice between the proven success of traditional values vs the demonstrable failures of secular socialism, they’ll never choose the latter. Only if there is no choice, if the other choice is destroyed, will the people choose secular socialism.