Posted on 02/18/2008 2:19:07 PM PST by neverdem
The quandary: Preventing deadly campus shootings while respecting rights
A week ago, Steven Kazmierczak walked into Tony's Guns & Ammo, a yellow shop in a back yard near the University of Illinois, and bought a Remington shotgun and a 9 mm Glock pistol.
Around the same time, family members noticed that Kazmierczak was acting "erratically," after he had stopped taking prescription medicines for anxiety.
Kazmierczak used his two new guns, and two more he had also purchased legally, to kill five students and himself Thursday in a shooting rampage at Northern Illinois University that leaves policymakers again scrambling to figure out how they can stop the carnage.
In the wake of April's massacre at Virginia Tech, in which a student with a history of mental problems bought guns that he used to kill 32 people and then himself, lawmakers in Washington and across the nation looked for ways to prevent unstable people from getting guns.
It remains unclear exactly what Kazmierczak's mental state was at the time of the shooting, and it is even less certain whether Illinois' new law on reporting mental illness, one of the toughest in the nation, would have made any difference.
But the shootings and the legislative response raise two of the nation's most controversial subjects -- gun control and the rights of the mentally ill -- in a volatile combination, further inflamed by the horror and outrage...
--snip--
When the new state law takes effect June 1, health professionals in Illinois will be required to report to the Department of Human Services any patient "whose mental condition is of such a nature that it is manifested by violent, suicidal, threatening or assaultive behavior" -- the kind of reporting that previously took place only when a person was admitted to a mental health institution...
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
IIRC, withdrawal from the others classes can also be problematic.
time to ban anxiety.
Here's my answer. Make it a law that every law abiding citizen must own a gun and learn to use it. Then sit back and watch the crime rate plummet.
We can lay the blame for school shootings at the feet of:
a. the medical/psychological industry, and
b. the officials who control academic institutions and believe rules will save them from whackos.
TC
These drugs probably kill far more people than the “evil” firearm.
Mark my words.
Soon people voluntarily seeking psychiatric help and are taking antidepressants will be disallowed from buying firearms. Won’t matter if its court ordered or not. Won’t matter if the medical records are currently “private”. After that it will move to any classifiable “mental disorder” including benign things like insomnia.
The recent NRA backed bill is just the first step down that road.
And no I don’t have my tin foil hat on.
Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it!
www.AnySoldier.com
Be honest.
Lay the BLAME for the murder spree on the GUN CONTROL freaks that leave the INNOCENT DEFENSELESS.
There will always be nuts, on drugs or not, however if you are not permitted to properly defend yourself - you die.
“The actual debate should be over how many teachers, professors, custodians and the like should be required to possess a gun on campus.”
Exactly!
This was another “gun free zone”.
If you wanted to prevent NIU, all they had to do was put his name in the database.
***Here’s my answer. Make it a law that every law abiding citizen must own a gun and learn to use it. Then sit back and watch the crime rate plummet.***
Will there be exceptions for people who object to them?
(I’m not including myself in that group)
I have a better idea , every time a citizen dies due to this stupidity, a politician shall forfeit his/her life as retribution.
That's precisely where the Illinois law is going.
Illinois already bans gun ownership by anyone admitted to a mental hospital. If you're a LEO and an alcoholic, I know that never happens, if you seek inpatient treatment the state will pull your right to own a fdirearm, and lose you job. As a LEO, your union will know how to handle it. As a citizen, you'll need a knowledgeable attorney and a cooperative shrink.
Of course you could simply take a pass on treatment.
Now we'll extend that to drugs. Be careful what the dentist prescribes after pulling your teeth.
BTW, the federal reporting bill you allude to makes perfect sense. If someone is judged a danger to self or others, that should be in the public domain.
I suggest you read my post more carefully.
TC
OOPPPPSSSS!
Sorry about that.
“The current debate is whether to allow guns on campus. The actual debate should be over how many teachers, professors, custodians and the like should be required to possess a gun on campus.”
I didn’t finish reading your answer!
Last night we dined with another family ... and of course this topic came up .... they wanted MORE gun control ... this REALLY PISSES me off ... so I calmly told them
IT WAS A GUN FREE ZONE
LIKE ALL THE OTHER ONES!
How did this STOP this idiot from not killing others?
Idiots don’t respect these “gun free zones”.
Of course they “didn’t know that” and preceded to hail the Hickster ... what a night of SELF CONTROL. All I can say is they were presented with FACTS and what they chose to do with them is anyones guess. People are sooo STUPID, by choice.
Any one hear what drugs he was taking?
“I have a better idea , every time a citizen dies due to this stupidity, a politician shall forfeit his/her life as retribution.”
you have it all wrong, that’s not suffering. let these critters lose all of their properties and benefits, then watch them squirm.
What they mean by “foolproof” is that only the government has any guns. And when that doesn’t work - criminals seem to REFUSE to obey the law, imagine that - they will pretend that the problem is STILL “the ready access to guns”, even though guns are so restricted that the only way to get one is on the black market.
Have there been more and more incidents like this over the last 10 years?
"Yes"
Have gun laws become more or less restrictive over the last 10 years?
"More."
Then doesn't it make sense that more restrictive gun laws have led to more violence?
Correlation isn't causation, but they'll still tie themselves in knots working on that one.
If we had reasonable restrictions on the First Amendment that prohibited the reporting of mass shootings these nut jobs wouldn’t be triggered into copycat type crimes
You are not the first to propose this. See Heinlein's "Beyond This Horizon" as an example:
One sub-theme of the book is the carrying and use of firearms. In the novel being armed is part of being a man; otherwise he wears a brassard and is considered weak and inferior. Women are allowed but not expected to be armed. Duels, either deadly or survivable, may easily occur when someone feels that they have been wronged or insulted, a custom that keeps order and politeness. A defining quote from the book, "An armed society is a polite society", is very popular with those in the United States who support the personal right to bear arms. (cited from here.)
It is also curious that the book is part of the "early, liberal-minded Heinlein" period (the novel was first published in 1942.) I guess the meaning of many words changed in last decades.
Prozac was the one I saw mentioned in the Chicago Sun-Times, but have heard nothing more. It wouldn’t surprise me to hear that he’d also been on lithium which is used for manic-depressive but has undesirable side-effects - so much so that people like my brother didn’t want to take it as regularly as he should have.
Even though that is a racist statement, I can take care of that by outlawing, or requiring registration of, anything black. /sarc>
Ok, so it’s the medication so make it a law to have to take it .... Illinois, sounds like a second England, Australia and New Zealand .....
Not all who wore the Brassard of Peace were weak and inferior. I must note that the “Guardians” (IIRC) who were the Police Officers of that society wore both the Brassard of Peace and carried arms. Everyone was thereby put on notice - by the combination of the Brassard and the weapon - that they could not be fired upon.
I'd also add, that if one were out drinking, or otherwise incapcitated/injured, a brassard was called for.
A fun way to deal with liberals at the dinner table that get all smug about gun control: Simply deny that the event happened.
When they ask if you've heard about "this latest school shooting..." you merely say: "I heard about it, but I'm sure it never happened."
"Of course it happened. It's in all the news."
"Couldn't have happened. It's a gun free zone. Impossible. There are no guns in gun free zones. It's the law."
"It doesn't matter what the law says..."
"Oh really?" You can smile at this point. :-)
We’re Christians too ... and the Huckster came up. We, or I should say I, informed them that “we voted for the MORMON”. Jaws dropped. “They asked didn’t you know Dobson endorsed Huckabee?” I say, “sure did!” but Pat Robertson endorsed McCain ... it doesn’t matter WHO endorses whom ... we did our homework and saw the FRAUD he is and “voted for the Mormon” who showed more Biblical principles than the backslidden Baptist. We’re also Baptist. Honestly, I can’t understand these “Christians” and how easily they are influenced and confuse Christianity with Humanism.
I also asked them if they’d mind if they’re too kids were in the auditorium and someone off their meds came in with an AK-47 and shot them dead? Would that be okay? Absolutely defenseless in the “gun free zone”? I told them we’d want our kids to have a chance and that meant GUNS on someone ideally our kids! They just stared ... I’m still not sure if they “got it”.
OF course they don't mention that he bought his other two handguns months ago, before he went off his meds.
What will happen is that people will stop seeking psychiatric help, knowing they'll lose their guns and their ability to defend themselves.
Hardly, that would merely drive him to purchase the guns from an individual, rather than a licensed dealer. That might even be from an unlicensed dealer in stolen firearms. He wasn't far from the South Side of Chicago, where all handguns are illegal, and are freely available in back alleys and such, as are other sorts of "illegal" and legal but not for him, weapons.
“Anyone hear what drugs he was taking?”
Not me, not yet. But his tattoos really creeped me out. Talk about a warning!
Can you describe the tattoo?
Does anyone know the religious affiliation of this
Kazmierczak? ROP,Baptist,Catholic,Mormon? Just wondering.
It’s interesting the huge rush to criminalize anyone “mentally ill” by forcing doctors to report them to the state, invade their privacy, etc. But the question is, how many people “mentally ill” actually go on shooting rampages? A very tiny minority.
Instead of banning guns, why not ban the DRUGS that seem to cause psychosis, particulary in young men, or can induce psychosis during withdrawals? Why not make doctors accountable who prescribe these meds like candy but then do not follow up to supervise their patients?
I saw three of them on TV. They were apparantly photographed by the tattoo artist. One was a large knife, vertical, sticking through the top of a skull. Another was a cartoon character on a bicyle, riding through blood, with blood splashes all around. I can’t remember the third. The artist said he had been in for more tats in the last month or so.
Not true. He could still buy a firearm in another way.
Thanks for the info!
Very interesting from the doctor’s perspective, I see. But the media’s slant to mental illness in crime might be wrong anyway, no one has actually reported that this man had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar, or whatever. Sounds more like a sociopath when you look at the tattoos and other things in his past.
Also, I have read that the “mentally ill” commit violent crimes at the same rate as the general population, about 2-3 percent. Even with psychosis, I believe most ill people tend to harm only themselves, not others. So I don’t believe the facts warrant the invasion of privacy, patient-doctor confidentiality, and personal liberties that would be imposed by trying through some very elaborate and expensive system to keep guns away from someone who you, as you say, you really cannot predict will do something.
The link in comment# 1 is to PubMed. SSRIs can cause serotonin syndrome when starting therapy or the dose is increased. They also can cause a withdrawal syndrome. One comment stated that the NIU killer was taking Prozac. Prozac has the longest half-life of all the SSRIs.
Making Sense of the Great Suicide Debate
There are a bunch of interesting links on that thread. The last link in comment# 6 is to "The Serotonin Syndrome." It's a pretty good review article.
Antidepressants and Violence: Problems at the Interface of Medicine and Law
David Healy used to be a shill for SSRIs and gave expert testimony for their manufacturers in court. Now Dr Healy has finally seen the light.
Antidepressants are all the rage but have a dark side
Rosie Meysenburg of Dallas and Sara Bostock of California met at a public hearing on SSRIs sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration. Both had strong reservations about the safety of SSRIs. Together, they created a Web site, SSRIstories.com, which catalogs more than 2,000 news stories detailing violent acts -- murders, suicides, school shootings -- by individuals taking SSRIs.
I grew up in a very samll town ( a few hundred people) everyone knew everyone. There was the one “crazy” guy that all towns have. Always walking evey where in and out of the State Mental Hospital. I talked to him many times in passing as did everyone else. Heck he grew up there. One of the time he quit his meds (one time of many) he got in a fight with his mother. The local policeman came over to talk to him(we only had one the retired minister). Set down in a chair and the guy comes into the room where the cop and mother is and blows the guy away with a shot gun. The one time too many that he stopped his meds. This time he is in prision for life. The laws will not keep mental patients hospitalized for life. The go in and out and sometimes it just happens. Blame the ACLU. This protection and living in the community stuff started in the 1980’s and the mental hospitals were emptied. You can not keep them hospitalized . His family had begged for year for him to stay hospitalized but NO.
I agree on the medication but I have to stick up for the great PRNJ...WE have the most restrictive gun laws outside of NYC because we also have the largest number of stupid, venal, corrupt political A..holes (R & D) in the nation and the largest number of stupid and venal voters in the tri state area who, while constantly complaining, reliably vote to keep the political A...holes (R & D) in office.
It’s sort of like watching flesh eating bacteria at work.
most of these mass murders are linked to prescription meds.
the only one I don’t think that was (IIRC) the Amish school shootings.
Carolyn
I blame the cuckoo pills.
You are correct...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.