Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 02/18/2008 10:17:33 AM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:

Childish behavior



Skip to comments.

WHY THE FAIRTAX WON'T WORK
NCPA ^ | 2/15/2008 | NCAP staff

Posted on 02/16/2008 3:30:21 PM PST by xcamel

One solution to the nation's long-term fiscal problems that has gained support in recent years is the idea of replacing all federal taxes with a 23 percent national retail sales tax called the FairTax. Unfortunately, the administrative problems inherent in this proposal make it impossible to take seriously, says Bruce Bartlett, former deputy assistant secretary for economic policy at the U.S. Treasury Department.

For example, under a FairTax scheme: A worker now netting $800 per week would immediately get a $200 raise and start taking home the full $1,000 gross wage that he is paid; instead of paying income and payroll taxes, workers would pay their taxes when they buy things.
The FairTax would impose a 23 percent tax on all goods and services (this is not really correct, but for now we'll accept it at face value for analytical purposes).

Whether he is better off or not depends on what his effective tax rate is: Assuming he spends all his income and no more than that, he will be no worse off if he now pays 23 percent of his income in taxes. That is, his effective tax rate is 23 percent; in this case, the FairTax is a wash, the worker is no better off or worse off in terms of taxes than he is now.

But what if the worker is now paying less than 23 percent of his income in federal taxes? In this case, he is clearly worse off, says Bartlett: The prices of the things he buys will rise by more than his income rises from the elimination of income and payroll taxes. Conversely, if one is wealthy and in a tax bracket above 23 percent, that person would be much better off. His income and payroll taxes would fall by much more than the prices of goods and services he consumes would rise.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, "Why the FairTax Won't Work," Tax Notes, December 24, 2007.

For text:

Full PDF report

For more on Taxes


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: fairtax; tax; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 601-613 next last
To: Normal4me

If I pull money out of savings it won’t be for a vacumn cleaner:’) Whatever I buy though I expect to pay the 8 plus % in taxes. That is in addition to everything I pay in to IRS.


121 posted on 02/16/2008 4:57:27 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Don’t be a “stuffing your mattress” hypocrite.


122 posted on 02/16/2008 4:58:19 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

bookmarked


123 posted on 02/16/2008 4:59:18 PM PST by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

well.. that brings up a very interesting conundrum..

item cost $77, +$23 fairtax = $100 + $8.50 sales tax which means you will be paying 1.995 sales tax on the fair tax portion, or 11.03% sales tax on the cost of the item.

Well doesn’t that just “suck rocks”...


124 posted on 02/16/2008 5:01:45 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

C,mere. What’s that in your eye?


125 posted on 02/16/2008 5:02:10 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

An image of irate poster hoisted on her own petard.


126 posted on 02/16/2008 5:03:15 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"Where will the money for the monthly FT entitlement check come from? We're not getting one now."

Adding 50 million non taxpayers might help. I don't like the prebate myself. It just creates the possibility of more fraud and deceit.

127 posted on 02/16/2008 5:04:40 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Therefore, assuming for the sake of the argument it’s revenue neutral for the individual, the cost, is the same.

If that was their argument, I would let it go. But their argument is that everyone will have more money and prices will stay the same. The reality is, if it is revenue neutral, there will be winners and losers but overall people will be about the same. But reading the fairtax propaganda, it is the ultimate fairytale. Everyone wins big.

128 posted on 02/16/2008 5:04:41 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Wouldn't the best tax be one that is hardest to avoid and has the least impact on behavior?

Income tax is avoided by working "off-the-books", by tips, by "gifts", by barter, by cash businesses, etc. Sales tax is avoided by used items, "off-the-book" sales, barter, etc. I would suspect that avoidance is driven by liklihood of being caught and the amount of the tax.

No one shops garage sales to avoid a 9% sales tax. People may buy used stuff to avoid a 30% tax. (40% if the local tax is added on top.)

That is not to say that something does not need to be done. Gas taxes are nearly impossible to avoid, VATs are difficult to avoid. Property taxes are difficult to avoid.

If it were not for the fact that government raises every tax they have, I'd like to have small taxes on everything. Alabama is taxed somewhat like this. Single-digit income tax. Single-digit sales taxes (state, county and local total.) Probably a small gas tax. Low property taxes. Somewhat low "sin taxes".

I like it because tax decisions do not control our lives.

129 posted on 02/16/2008 5:07:23 PM PST by Onelifetogive (This is an Obama-nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
I did?

Ok, what did I post that offended you? What's wrong with you? You usually don't post like this. Can't I have an opinion about this too?

130 posted on 02/16/2008 5:08:03 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Sorry, but in my math world, your 25% computation is in error, assuming the tax rate table you presented is accurate.

The way I understand your example, there are no brackets...

there are two ways to interpret:

from $0 to $7,825 10%
from $7,826 to $31,850 15%

For a $30k income, the tax is either $4500 (wrong, most likely)
or $4108.75 (more likely)

131 posted on 02/16/2008 5:08:43 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Ok, what did I post that offended you?

I wasn't offended. YOU were the one playing the victim, not I.

132 posted on 02/16/2008 5:09:27 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

I could see more bartering but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.


133 posted on 02/16/2008 5:09:38 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
FIY.. SS, medicare/medicaid are not now, nor have they ever been “income taxes”

They certainly are, if they are based on a percentage of total income, even if you call them "wheelbarrows"...

134 posted on 02/16/2008 5:11:35 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
But their argument is that everyone will have more money and prices will stay the same.

I see now, thanks.

Perhaps this isn't the same thinking, but I can see an argument that costs will go down due to the reduction in accounting overhead. This would be the case in my business if I no longer had to do payroll taxes.

I could also see government cost going down due to IRS. And I could see revenue increases due to taxes collected on income/expense transactions not currently collected such as black market, drugs..

Now, whether the tax rate were lowered if/when these revenue streams occurred is another question.

I also could see it being more politically popular to lower taxes (and avoid raising them) when people see and pay the tax every day.

Thanks for your reply.

135 posted on 02/16/2008 5:12:20 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

“Section 103(f) of the Fair Tax Act (reintroduced in the 110th Congress on January 4, 2007) makes bartering under the FairTax a taxable event enforceable by penalties...”

http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/Lamar_Smith_rebuttal_letter1-11-07.pdf


136 posted on 02/16/2008 5:12:52 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I am a victim and so are you. You should be upset about it too. If anyone else took from us like the government does it would be robbery and people would go to jail. My biggest support for this tax is that I want people to see what is happening. Do you think a 30 or 40% tax would be accepted cheerfully? People would be furious to see what has been going on (which is why congress will fight this IMO)


137 posted on 02/16/2008 5:13:37 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

http://www.fairtax.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9493&news_iv_ctrl=1541

Just wondering if you only read articles against the Fair Tax?


138 posted on 02/16/2008 5:14:21 PM PST by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO cuz I'm too conservative to be a Republican. McCain is the Conservatives true litmus test)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Someone mentioned the other day rhat we have so many laws on the book that we probably break several unintentionally a day. Another subject though.


139 posted on 02/16/2008 5:15:33 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Funny math. Corporate taxes are under $400 billion, which amount to only about 3% embedded tax. To state that corporate tax somehow adds up to 23% embedded tax is outright lying.

Those taxes compound! Do you know how many times an item is taxed before it comes to the retail market?

Where are you getting your numbers?

140 posted on 02/16/2008 5:16:39 PM PST by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 601-613 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson