Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Weighs a Ban on Weapons in Space, but U.S. Still Objects
The New York Times ^ | February 13, 2008 | By Nick Cumming-Bruce

Posted on 02/12/2008 6:51:39 PM PST by JACKRUSSELL

(GENEVA) — The Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, on Tuesday presented a Russian-Chinese draft treaty banning weapons in space to the United Nations Conference on Disarmament, an idea that was quickly rejected by the United States.

Russia and China have pushed for years for a treaty to prevent an arms race in space, a threat underlined by China last year after it shot down one of its own aging satellites.

Responding to previous American assertions that there is no arms race in space and therefore no need for a treaty, Mr. Lavrov instead submitted a draft on “prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space, the threat or use of force against outer space objects.”

“Weapons deployment in space by one state will inevitably result in a chain reaction,” Mr. Lavrov warned. “And this in turn is fraught with a new spiral in the arms race, both in space and on the earth.”

The draft treaty aims to fill gaps in existing law, create conditions for further exploration and use of space, and strengthen general security and arms control, Mr. Lavrov said. It is time “to start serious practical work in this field,” he said. The White House responded to the proposal on Tuesday afternoon, saying it opposed any treaty that sought “to prohibit or limit access to or use of space.”

Dana M. Perino, the White House press secretary, said such a treaty would also be impossible to enforce. “Any object orbiting or transiting through space can be a weapon if that object is intentionally placed onto a collision course with another space object,” she said in an e-mail message. “This makes treaty verification impossible.”

Instead, she said, the White House favored “discussions aimed at promoting transparency and confidence-building measures.”

The Russian-Chinese proposal was first circulated last......

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsrace; china; russia; space; un; unitednations

1 posted on 02/12/2008 6:51:52 PM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Duchess47; jahp; LilAngel; metmom; EggsAckley; Battle Axe; SweetCaroline; Grizzled Bear; ...
MADE IN CHINA POTTERY STAMP

(Please FReepmail me if you would like to be on or off of the list.)
2 posted on 02/12/2008 6:52:20 PM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

The UN? FM!


3 posted on 02/12/2008 6:53:01 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

No worries, UN. Obama is already promising hope for change to the right path. Your puppet will dance gleefully to your tune.


4 posted on 02/12/2008 6:53:06 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

If the ban on weapons in space makes us safer, then maybe the UN can ban weapons in the air too, and by the stroke of a pen, rid the world of all gunfire too.


5 posted on 02/12/2008 6:58:35 PM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I wonder how long that objection will last if McCain gets in?


6 posted on 02/12/2008 7:00:17 PM PST by Slump Tester (-What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL
"...Mr. Lavrov instead submitted a draft on “prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space, the threat or use of force against outer space objects.” "

My guess is that this is an attempt to ban the future deployment of US ballistic missile defenses on the grounds that the missiles they will be fired at pass through space. The USSR was, and Russia is very paranoid about the possibility of their ICBM forces being rendered impotent. China is just tagging along for the anti-American ride.

7 posted on 02/12/2008 7:00:35 PM PST by the lone wolf (Good Luck, and watch out for stobor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL
Here's another article on it (Space Daily): Moscow To Present Sino-Russian Space Arms Race Control Initiative.
8 posted on 02/12/2008 7:26:25 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Any treaty with Russia, China, or any Communists or Muslim Country is a one way street. They merrily violate them all while we dutifully comply. It is one sided disarmament.


9 posted on 02/12/2008 7:41:59 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL
Screw Em!!
10 posted on 02/12/2008 7:42:26 PM PST by Historix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! The UN can’t even stop Iran and other rogue nations from developing nuclear weapons - how can they e xpect to do anything worth a darn in space?!?


11 posted on 02/12/2008 8:36:01 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Someone please explain to me why we are still in the UN, let alone letting them stay here (on Rockefeller donated land mind you).


12 posted on 02/12/2008 8:37:26 PM PST by Rob112586 (All I ask is a tall ship, and a strong wind to steer her by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol; Lukasz; strategofr; GSlob; spanalot; Thunder90; Tailgunner Joe; propertius; REactor; ...
Russia/Soviet/Coldwar2 PING!!!

to be added or removed from this list, please FReepmail me...

13 posted on 02/12/2008 9:37:44 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the lone wolf

BINGO!


14 posted on 02/12/2008 11:33:36 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great, why is Osama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

>>No worries, UN. Obama is already promising hope for change to the right path. Your puppet will dance gleefully to your tune<<

Yup, the forces of evil are just bidding their time before one of the 2 liberal clowns: Huseein Osama and Hitlery get to the WH.

It’s time for Bush to skull-F those commie bastards before the Dumocrats weaken our country for the next 4 years.


15 posted on 02/12/2008 11:38:56 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL
a Russian-Chinese draft treaty banning weapons in space to the United Nations Conference on Disarmament...“Weapons deployment in space by one state will inevitably result in a chain reaction,” Mr. Lavrov warned. “And this in turn is fraught with a new spiral in the arms race, both in space and on the earth.”

The Chinese have had no problem proliferating nuclear technology when it suited them. The Pakistani and North Korean nuclear programs, and through them the Iranian nuclear program, are the result of deliberate Chinese technology transfers.

Now they are opposed to weapons in space because....they have a sudden commitment to peace?

In fact, they can't match American superiority in space weapons currently, and the price to catch up is too steep. That's the only reason.

16 posted on 02/12/2008 11:51:38 PM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Shades of 1938 -- today's silence & appeasement from the West relating to Russia's dictator is even more frightening, considering the alarming headline below.

Russia threatens nuclear attack on Ukraine

17 posted on 02/13/2008 4:25:23 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never 'free')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Thank you for the ping.


18 posted on 02/15/2008 12:53:12 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1886546/posts?page=4972#4972 45 Item Communist Manifesto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson