Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Beach police seize photos from Abercrombie store [cited manager on obscenity charges]
The Virginian Pilot ^ | 2/3/08 | Steve Stone

Posted on 02/03/2008 8:42:32 AM PST by XR7

Police, saying they were responding to citizen complaints, carted away two large promotional photographs from the Abercrombie & Fitch store in Lynnhaven Mall on Saturday and cited the manager on obscenity charges.

Adam Bernstein, a police spokesman, said the seizure and the issuance of the summons came only after store management had not heeded warnings to remove the images.

The citation was issued under City Code Section 22.31, Bernstein said, which makes it a crime to display "obscene materials in a business that is open to juveniles." He did not say what was being done with the pictures and when the manager, whose name was not released, is scheduled to appear in court.

The manager, reached by telephone, declined to comment on the incident Saturday, saying that he was conferring with and waiting for guidance from Abercrombie corporate officials.

The mural-like black-and-white photographs were taken from the store at midafternoon.

Bernstein confirmed that one depicts three shirtless young men from the back, walking through a field. The man in the lead appears to be about to pull up his jeans, which have slipped down enough to reveal his upper buttocks.

The same image is displayed on the Abercrombie Web site.

The other image is of a woman who is topless and whose "breast is displayed with her hand covering just the nipple portion," Bernstein said. "You could still pretty much see the rest of the breast."

The seizure was "prompted by several customer complaints, and the management of Abercrombie & Fitch was notified of those complaints," Bernstein said.

The company's corporate offices in New Albany, Ohio, were closed Saturday and no officials could be reached for comment.

Bernstein said the summons for a Class One misdemeanor was issued to the manager because there is no legal way to issue a summons to a corporate entity in such circumstances. The manager was not arrested but faces a fine of up to $2,000 and as much as a year in jail, if convicted.

Bernstein said that in a meeting last week with store management, the officer - who is assigned to routine patrol of the mall - said he understood it was a corporate decision as to what would be displayed in the stores. But he explained that that didn't exempt the local store from complying with the city code.

Bernstein said management was told specifically: "We want those advertising signs taken down."

When the officer returned to the store Saturday, Bernstein said, he found that the pictures were still in place.

Abercrombie & Fitch has earned a reputation for its risqué catalogues and promotional photography featuring scantily clothed models.

In 2003, the company halted publication of its 7-year-old A&F Quarterly catalog because of complaints about sexually suggestive photographs by award-winning photographer Bruce Weber.

Steve Stone, (757) 446-2309, steve.stone@pilotonline.com


TOPICS: US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: abercrombie; abercrombiefitch; boycott; childabuse; childexploitation; culturewar; donutwatch; gayagenda; homosexualagenda; obscene; obscenity; pedophile; pedophiles; pedophilia; perversion; pornification; sexualizingchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last
Abercrombie & Fitch has earned a reputation for its risqué catalogues and promotional photography featuring scantily clothed models.

Exploiters of children.
Lock 'em up!

Agree or disagree?

1 posted on 02/03/2008 8:42:34 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: XR7
For a clothing store, they sure promote a lot of nakedness.
2 posted on 02/03/2008 8:47:21 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7
They sure do push the envelope with their advertising. But Lock 'em up? Not so sure.

Maybe "Make 'em show more mature models" fits, or "Put a sock on that".
3 posted on 02/03/2008 8:48:55 AM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

Have you ever been in one of those stores? Their large size wouldn’t fit a Barbie doll...and that’s before it’s washed.


4 posted on 02/03/2008 8:49:18 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XR7

what great free publicity for them....


5 posted on 02/03/2008 8:49:47 AM PST by porter_knorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: porter_knorr

They need it too, they are closing a few stores.


6 posted on 02/03/2008 8:51:49 AM PST by cmsgop ( McCain , Do Not Want.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: XR7

The Va-Beach police have given Ab-Fitch exactly what they were looking for....free publicity. That’s what they do with their “edgy” advertising.

Are their ads pushing the lines of taste? Yes. Obscene? It’s in the eye of the beholder...there are places where Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition is obscene.


7 posted on 02/03/2008 8:52:50 AM PST by Keith in Iowa ( <<<Say NO! to Juan McAmnesty!>>>!!! <<<Life's a bitch, don't elect one President.>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

Posing as the cure, no doubt.


8 posted on 02/03/2008 8:53:26 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Their large size wouldn’t fit a Barbie doll

Thanks for the tip. Mrs ASA Vet is a size 00 or smaller. I'll take her there forthwith.

9 posted on 02/03/2008 8:53:31 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: XR7
A&F have come a ways from "Man's Favorite Sport"
10 posted on 02/03/2008 8:54:29 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
"Make 'em show more mature models"

How, if not locking 'em up?

11 posted on 02/03/2008 8:54:56 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: XR7

I am unaware of any definition of obscene that been held as constitutional that these ads would meet. There is neither nudity not sexual content in either of them.

Virginia Beach is going to end up owing Abercrombie quite a bit of money if they persist with this prosecution.


12 posted on 02/03/2008 8:57:02 AM PST by Moral Hazard (Fred Thompson/Joe Don Baker in 08, because America needs bald, beefy character actors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Sorry, sarcasm or facetiousness tag wasn't attached.

If the clothes were made for older folks, they'd have older models. The near-nudity advertising sells, and they know it. Regardless of age.
13 posted on 02/03/2008 8:58:06 AM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Bring earplugs...the music is so loud you can’t hear yourself think.


14 posted on 02/03/2008 8:58:14 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: XR7
RE: the Pictures seized (According to the article link)

Butt Crack?

If you can get charges for pictures of that then I know of several consturction workers/plumbers who probably would make the FBI's top ten most wanted list, for real-time obscenity charges.

15 posted on 02/03/2008 9:01:00 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: porter_knorr

I’m certain that they broke out the emergency fax machines at A&F headquarters after this decision was made. They can’t wait for this type of stuff to happen so they can remind everyone they still exist.


16 posted on 02/03/2008 9:04:27 AM PST by nitzy (globalism and limited government cannot co-exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: XR7

The “models” are young enough that I am surprised Abercronbie isn’t charged with manufacturing kiddie porn.


17 posted on 02/03/2008 9:11:52 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Butt Crack? I know of several consturction workers/plumbers...

But they don't display huge posters of said butt crack so they're good to go. No pictures; they're real live 'actors', no sweat.

Like all of the real life "kids" running around looking like the A&F adverts. Oh wait....none. Never mind. But we're talking about it huh?

And Va Beach (23456 zip code, I always liked that) is making it 'news'.
18 posted on 02/03/2008 9:12:36 AM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan; EarthBound

I’ve walked by the images plenty of times, and I would have to agree. For a CLOTHING store, they advertise alot of skin.

It might as well have been a softcore porn shop. And frankly, I was suprised they weren’t charged with such things earlier.


19 posted on 02/03/2008 9:13:09 AM PST by MacDorcha (Do you feel that you can place full trust in your obsevations of the physical world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XR7

All the VBPD needs to do is contact Arlen Spectors office.


20 posted on 02/03/2008 9:14:21 AM PST by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

Exploiters of children.
Lock ‘em up!


Are the ad models under-aged?


21 posted on 02/03/2008 9:14:47 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied

This is a mall that has little signs up all around that have %@*! with a “no” sign over it.

And it is enforced with fines + removal from the area. (If the wrong person hears you that is.)


22 posted on 02/03/2008 9:15:07 AM PST by MacDorcha (Do you feel that you can place full trust in your obsevations of the physical world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

lol


23 posted on 02/03/2008 9:15:19 AM PST by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

I cannot go into their store, when we walk pass it in MacArthur Mall the smell gives me a headache, I can’t imagine going in. And my husband says their clothes are gay.


24 posted on 02/03/2008 9:16:53 AM PST by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
NOT PHOTOSHOPPED: this is what came up when I clicked on your link

,(:>):


25 posted on 02/03/2008 9:17:36 AM PST by Yehuda ("Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!" (Choke on it, pinkos!); Waterboarding Jihadists Works!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: XR7

I once was approached by a teenage girl outside of the A&F store in downtown Portland, OR. She wanted me to go in and buy her an A&F catalog (with her money - $3). You had to be over 18 to do so and apparently she wasn’t quite there yet. I kept looking around for Allen Funt. The whole thing seemed ridiculous but at the same time quite clever.


26 posted on 02/03/2008 9:20:05 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

They desensitive children to sexuality to me. It’s not the ‘beauty of the naked body’ they promote, it’s pre-adult sexual scenes. Or alluding to that.
And I still haven’t figured out how showing LESS clothes sells MORE clothes.


27 posted on 02/03/2008 9:20:54 AM PST by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

How about “get over it”????

Unfortunately, it looks like some court, some judge, will have to apply some arbitray, subjective standard to the content of the posters and rule one way or the other on this affront to public morality.
Why don’t parents keep their kids out of A&F if they don’t like the marketing? Why don’t they exercise their economic clout, and stop buying from A&F?

At this point, put me down for disagree... We’ve got bigger fish to fry.


28 posted on 02/03/2008 9:22:12 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

their catalogue showed full topless girls and butt shots of guys and girls. you had to be 18 to get it and it was shrinkwrapped. i could never understand why a store that sells clothing would have nude models but i got over it pretty quickly. those girls are smokin’.


29 posted on 02/03/2008 9:22:21 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7
I disagree.

The Virginia Beach police are fools and this sort of silliness reflects poorly on them and the city's resident who condone such prudish pettiness.

There's nothing obscene about this photo; Abercrombie typically shows "edgy" type pictures in their stores and in their catalogs.

The models are all 18+.

This is why folks laugh at places like Virginia Beach.

30 posted on 02/03/2008 9:22:28 AM PST by billorites (I think we're all Freepers on this bus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The turning point in the decline of the United States was when Abercrombie & Fitch stopped selling guns.

Abercrombie amp; Fitch Co - Company History

The New York store remained, of course, the company's flagship. At the close of the 1950s the main floor sported heads of buffalo, caribou, moose, elk, and other big game, stuffed fish of spectacular size, and elephant's-foot wastebaskets. [...] The basement was given over to the shooting range, while the mezzanine contained paraphernalia for skindiving, archery, skiing, and lawn games. [...] On the seventh floor, the gun room, besides more stuffed game heads, held about 700 shotguns and rifles, constituting the most lavish assemblage of sporting firearms on earth.

31 posted on 02/03/2008 9:22:58 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
No kidding? Lynnhaven Mall has become a 'no swearing' zone? Must be hel...er, heck for all of the young sailors from Oceana to go there.

I used to live nearby there, so this is sorta funny to me. The Red Baron and the Ready Room...sometimes Donald's Go-Go, sheesh even the Fleet Reserve club were often hangouts.
32 posted on 02/03/2008 9:24:15 AM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

“Are their ads pushing the lines of taste? Yes. Obscene? It’s in the eye of the beholder...there are places where Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition is obscene.”

I didn’t see these posters in the A&F store at the Tehran mall...


33 posted on 02/03/2008 9:24:17 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard
I am unaware of any definition of obscene that been held as constitutional that these ads would meet.

Actually there is no definition of "obscene" that has been held constitutional. Justice Potter Stewart famously said of hardcore pornography only, "I know it when I see it!"

This is why the definition is left up to community standards. What's acceptable in a large cosmopolitan city or a beach-town is just not acceptable in other places.

Bare chested men with buttocks visible could well be seen as obscene by certain communities.

The store manager was stupid not to pull down the mural when asked nicely.

I've always wondered how it is that stores like this, especially with the huge female images in tiny lingerie, were acceptable in a family-friendly mall.

34 posted on 02/03/2008 9:26:59 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Someone was placed under arrest for this?

35 posted on 02/03/2008 9:27:56 AM PST by billorites (I think we're all Freepers on this bus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: XR7

Lock the doors. Ban them from the Mall.


36 posted on 02/03/2008 9:29:29 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7
The manager was not arrested but faces a fine of up to $2,000 and as much as a year in jail, if convicted.

Here is the business side of this. The Mgr. shows up in count, pays the $2000 fine, does a few community service hours (do you really think he's going to jail for a year?)

Next, A&C get millions of dollars in free advertising targeting the demographics they want, the kids who see this as "rebellious" all for $2000.

PS - The store Manager gets moved to the top of a short promotion list and is rewarded.

37 posted on 02/03/2008 9:32:37 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Whatever happened to No Neck Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Ohhh...my eyes!!!!

Wow, much adieu about nothin'.
38 posted on 02/03/2008 9:33:18 AM PST by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
Teaching in a college, I've seen the Abercrombie and Fitch fad wax and wane. They did a good job of converting themselves from an L.L. Bean wannabe to a cutting edge college clothing store. They did this with a very effective branding scheme. The plan, to me, seemed to be destined to be short-lived. There's nothing to make their clothes worth the prices they're charging except for the "sizzle."

On a side note, Abercrombie and Fitch clothing is the white version of $150 sneakers for black kids. The only difference is that the $150 sneakers really are superior basketball shoes.

39 posted on 02/03/2008 9:35:46 AM PST by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: billorites
This is why folks laugh at places like Virginia Beach.

To take it a step further, this is why America is laughing at - and rejecting - the Republican Party.

40 posted on 02/03/2008 9:35:49 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied

There are issues for the police and issues for the public. If the public shops at A&F enough that they find such ads profitable, it is a public issue not a police issue.

And for that matter the SCOTUS said as much. It is hard to argue something is at odds with community standards if the community is shopping there based on these ads.


41 posted on 02/03/2008 9:36:03 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: XR7
It the local guardians of public decency really feel the pressing need to go after someone for this outrage, let them go after A&F corporate instead of some poorly-paid Joe or Jill forced to choose between losing their job for violating corporate policies or going to jail for violating local sensibilities - as it is, this poor jerk will be probably by lucky if he doesn't end up having to register as a convicted sex offender.
42 posted on 02/03/2008 9:37:22 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Again, the legal definition of obscenity is left up to “community standards.” If a jury-or-judge thinks this image is obscene in ultra-conservative-home-of-the-700-Club Virginia Beach community, than legally, by their community standards, it is.


43 posted on 02/03/2008 9:38:12 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
"in a meeting last week with store management, the officer - who is assigned to routine patrol of the mall..."

Ah, a mall cop. Much like I thought.

44 posted on 02/03/2008 9:38:58 AM PST by billorites (I think we're all Freepers on this bus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Seems a lot more petty, after actually seeing it.


45 posted on 02/03/2008 9:40:01 AM PST by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

???...great streeetch


46 posted on 02/03/2008 9:40:50 AM PST by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: XR7
Exploiters of children.

Lock 'em up!

Agree or disagree?

Is it a criminal or a civil infraction?

Bernstein said the summons for a Class One misdemeanor was issued to the manager because there is no legal way to issue a summons to a corporate entity in such circumstances. The manager was not arrested but faces a fine of up to $2,000 and as much as a year in jail, if convicted.

The owner of the store should be the one to face the citation.

47 posted on 02/03/2008 9:45:03 AM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
a woman who is topless and whose "breast is displayed with her hand covering just the nipple portion," Bernstein said. "You could still pretty much see the rest of the breast."

Good Lord, Andy! I think I just saw it!
Now I want you to rewind and when I give the word hit the pause button!


48 posted on 02/03/2008 9:47:28 AM PST by billorites (I think we're all Freepers on this bus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: XR7
the issuance of the summons came only after store management had not heeded warnings to remove the images

Two possibilities:

1) The thumping dance music was so loud they couldn't hear a thing.

2) The 'managers' (snort) are typical retails jobsworths who fear corporate more than they fear the law.

49 posted on 02/03/2008 9:49:29 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

What the heck is wrong with my country?
They are arresting people for putting up a poster like this on private property?

The only disgusting thing is that some innocent person was arrested for this.
Unbelievable.
The State rushes to oppress.

Why can the police state easily remove a poster some busybody doesn't like, while they can't get the crack dealers off a corner?

50 posted on 02/03/2008 9:49:32 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson