Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: BradtotheBone
Give everyone a million dollars and be done with it.
2 posted on
01/31/2008 12:21:03 PM PST by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: BradtotheBone
Tax payers with kids??? We have three. Ages 34, 32 and 28. Do we still get the rebates???
4 posted on
01/31/2008 12:22:35 PM PST by
RetiredArmy
(America wants socialism. It wants it all for free. It wants the government to provide all.)
To: BradtotheBone
Democrats said it would be difficult for senators to oppose sending rebate checks to seniorsI thought we already did that on a regular basis...it's called SS and Medicare. end/sarcasm
7 posted on
01/31/2008 12:25:57 PM PST by
dawn53
To: BradtotheBone
I'm sure this "stimulus package" includes lowering marginal tax rates, eliminating capital gains, and the death tax... right??? /s
I won't hold my breath...
8 posted on
01/31/2008 12:27:07 PM PST by
erikm88
To: BradtotheBone
Democrats said it would be difficult for senators to oppose sending rebate checks to seniors, who also have been lobbying intensively to be included in the stimulus bill. A democracy . . . can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. -- Alexander Fraser Tytler
9 posted on
01/31/2008 12:27:08 PM PST by
tx_eggman
("they want to be judged on their intentions, not their results" - libtards official motto)
To: BradtotheBone
God, how I hate supporting this bunch in Washington, DC - also at state and local levels. I wish they would all just STFU and go home and leave people alone.
Carolyn
10 posted on
01/31/2008 12:27:09 PM PST by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: BradtotheBone
Did they ever resolve on whether or not to give Puerto Rico a “income tax rebate” even tho they don’t pay income taxes?........
14 posted on
01/31/2008 12:29:22 PM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: BradtotheBone
A letter to the editor in my paper yesterday said this:
The gov. should reduce the witholding tax for 6 months to a year and cut the federal gasoline tax for 6 months.
Seems like a better idea than anything coming out of Washington. The Dems would never go for it because only benefit would go to people who actually pay income taxes.
15 posted on
01/31/2008 12:30:27 PM PST by
lonestar
To: BradtotheBone
“The Senate measure would deliver flat rebates of $500 for individuals and $1,000 for couples to anyone earning at least $3,000, with income limits of $150,000 for individuals and $300,000 for couples. The rebate would phase out for those making more, disappearing altogether for individuals with income of $160,000 for individuals and $320,000 for couples. The caps would be higher for those with children.”
I thought Reid & Pelosi don’t want the “rich” to get rebates. Sorry, but $300K a year don’t sound like poor to me. IMy guess is that it is that high so that Congress critters get a check for themselves.
Actually, I’m against the whole idea of rebates. I “might” get one, but it would be beer money(wife and I together don’t make $75K). Besides, by the time they get around to actually sending out checks, it won’t make a dime’s worth of difference.
16 posted on
01/31/2008 12:32:20 PM PST by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1 - Take no prisoners))
To: BradtotheBone; TigerLikesRooster; Travis McGee
If none of their proposals attracts enough backing to win approval, the Senate will pass the House measure, Reid said.There's the money quote. I was hoping they'd lard it up so much that GWB would veto it. But it looks like the "improved" version (which adds $30-$50B, not porky enough to bother GWB I bet) is Plan A, and if they can't get together on that then they just pass the House version as is and be done with it. The checks will go out.
So even after today's incredible stock market move (I think at least partially based on this very Senate revelation), I wouldn't bet against stocks going down below this morning's low for quite some time.
18 posted on
01/31/2008 12:33:55 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: BradtotheBone
I sure as hell want to know who would deny economic assistance to senior citizens.
26 posted on
01/31/2008 12:46:17 PM PST by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: BradtotheBone
I think this needs to go into committee for at least two years to make sure it is well thought out!
/s
29 posted on
01/31/2008 12:49:46 PM PST by
RobRoy
To: BradtotheBone
Bush has already said he will veto anything that comes to him that is different from what was originally agreed upon. Not that I’m in favor of this ‘stimulus package’, but clearly the libs are just using it as a political weapon instead of actually wanting to do anything to help the economy.
35 posted on
01/31/2008 12:53:45 PM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: BradtotheBone
When the "free" money train is careening down the tracks in an election year and the politicians are giving away money to every "worthwhile" cause in sight, it's hard to resist the juggernaut.
I weep for our Republic, or what little is left of it...
39 posted on
01/31/2008 12:57:10 PM PST by
Gritty
(Who is better to run the nanny state than the nanny,... the Democrats? - Wesley Pruden)
To: BradtotheBone
"Democrats have spoken on how this package can be improved," said Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. And as usual they got it wrong.
41 posted on
01/31/2008 12:58:26 PM PST by
VRWCmember
(Romney 2008 - The most palatable RINO left in the race)
To: BradtotheBone
heating aid for the poor What the hell does that have to do with the economy?
To: BradtotheBone
Under Reid's plan for Senate action on the stimulus package, the Senate could vote as early as Monday on a bill that would tack $32 billion onto the House measure with rebates of $500-$1,000 to all but the richest taxpayers, with more for families with children. My guess is that anybody that actually pays tax will have to count these rebates next year against their 2008 taxes, thereby increasing their tax liability (or reducing any refund they would be due) on April 15, 2009. (Of course the people that don't pay taxes will get to keep their "rebate".)
43 posted on
01/31/2008 1:00:45 PM PST by
VRWCmember
(Romney 2008 - The most palatable RINO left in the race)
To: BradtotheBone
Free money for everyone including illegal aliens with ITINs. Dems doing what they do best... buying votes with my tax money. Harry Reid would never treat his personal finances the way he treats Federal tax money he took from me. Arnold Schwartzenegger also spends like a drunken sailor and no way does he manage his own money (he’s worth north of $200 million) that way. If he did he would be worth only $10 million
44 posted on
01/31/2008 1:01:35 PM PST by
dennisw
To: BradtotheBone
If none of their proposals attracts enough backing to win approval, the Senate will pass the House measure, Reid said.
hold firm, boys & girls !
To: BradtotheBone; All
This annoys me to NO END! Isn't the nearly 9 TRILLION dollars You, Me, our friends and relatives, even freakin' Democrats that actually HAVE jobs, all paid in last YEAR enough? How is there not ENOUGH to go around? (Yes, that's rhetorical.) Bread and Circuses! Grrrrr!
49 posted on
01/31/2008 1:08:36 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson