Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Louisiana's Caucuses Tonight (Ambinder sees Romney Win)
The Atlantic.com ^ | 01/22/08 | Marc Ambinder

Posted on 01/22/2008 6:45:45 PM PST by Reaganesque

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Reaganesque

I heard that Huckabee has already pulled back some in Florida. If Romney takes Louisiana tonight, it will be due to his marvelous organization, and determination to succeed. With Fred out of the race (who has my everlasting thanks for having run his dignified campaign as a conservative and adult), Mitt is going to be much stronger in FL as well.

And his statement on Fred’s withdrawal was very classy, too.


21 posted on 01/22/2008 7:22:50 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Democrat party: When you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

22 posted on 01/22/2008 7:25:03 PM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

23 posted on 01/22/2008 7:25:03 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

:-) :-) :-)


24 posted on 01/22/2008 7:25:20 PM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008

God bless Fred Thompson. Go Mitt!


25 posted on 01/22/2008 7:27:00 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Number1FredHeadSwitch2Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

it’s my understanding that they only chose delegates tonight and there’s a primary on the 29th. If one candidate gets 50 percent plus one on that day, it’s winner take all. if not, the the delagates are free to vote as they want.


26 posted on 01/22/2008 7:28:13 PM PST by kcmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

DailyPaul is reporting that Paul is winning in the delegates.


27 posted on 01/22/2008 7:29:25 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Is there nowhere the results are being posted?


28 posted on 01/22/2008 7:32:48 PM PST by Timeout (I hate MediaCrats! ......and trial lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Mrs romney really needs a different hairdo. THat’s circa 1984.


29 posted on 01/22/2008 7:33:39 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
I called WAFB in Baton Rouge and haven't heard anything.

Nothing in Google News either.

30 posted on 01/22/2008 7:34:42 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tortdog
Does this mean that Catholics are generally anti-Huck?

I think that the loud but vocal Mormon haters have driven a lot of Catholics to Mitt because they understand these same yahoos view Catholics as second-class Christians.

They leave their warped anti-Catholic tracts all over the shopping malls in the area in which I live, predominately Catholic.

They look and read surprisingly similar to the anti-Mormon tracts I've collected in Utah or other places where Mormons are the predominant religion.

Both tracts give a Grand Rapids, Michigan address.

Fairly ironic that these yahoos might actually end up getting Romney nominated and elected, isn't it?

Remember the Democrat lawyers high-fiving each other during the Florida recount debacle in 2000 after disqualifying a large number of military votes? Remember how foolish they looked a couple weeks later when they went back wanting to count every vote of dimpled or hanging chads in selected districts?

Remember the Mormon hating bigots high fiving each other after they put Huckabee over the top in Iowa? Won't it be priceless when the Evangelical Christian Conservatives they claim to own reject Huckabee in growing numbers as the primaries move along?

God must have a sense of humor!

31 posted on 01/22/2008 7:34:43 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

32 posted on 01/22/2008 7:36:05 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Catholics (like myself) don’t wear their religion on their sleeves.
33 posted on 01/22/2008 7:36:14 PM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

:-) :-) (Notice the ranking — LOL). Thanks!


34 posted on 01/22/2008 7:36:47 PM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tortdog

I have no idea.

But I see Protestants and evangelicals as being a natural source of support (for Huckabee) in the northern part of Louisiana.

I’d be curious as to who Catholic GOP caucus-goers are supporting in louisiana.


35 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:01 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kcmom

There’s three parts to the LA primaries. The first part is the caucus. The second part is the primary. Then they have a statewide convention.

At least this is how I understand it.

The one I don’t quite understand it hawaii. It’s suposed to start this friday I think. And it lasts a week, I think. I don’t know if they just keep the polling places open for a week straight to make it easier on working folks that are busy, or if they actually caucus for several days, or what the heck they are doing.


36 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:26 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

In 1996, it was called a caucus but it was more like a primary. However there were a limited number of polling locations — I guess maybe they were run by the party rather than the state. However there were very long lines — Gramm was thought to be the most popular, but it was the Buchanan supporters that were willing to wait 5 hours to vote. I admit I wasn’t among the willing.


37 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:29 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
The MSM's dismissing of supposedly "uncontested" races is remarkably stupid.

Did they never pause to think why these races are uncontested? Hmmm? Could it be that no one decided to compete with Mitt in states like Louisiana, Nevada, and Wyoming because no one thought they had a chance?

The fact Mitt's opponents are choosing not to compete with him in so many states says a lot about his strength as a national candidate.

Too bad reporters are too stupid to realize this.

38 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:40 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I guess that shows how conservative she is?


39 posted on 01/22/2008 7:41:24 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Guys, I’m going to say this was some reservation...

Apparently the two parties that are out in full force tonight are Mitt Romney and.... Ron Paul.

Apparently 600 people showed up at a Paul gathering in Baton Rouge. Yes, a college town. But according to sources, the concensus is that Romney and Paul are the most visible.

States like this with little press coverage worry me a bit...

Perhaps too much.

But recall Paul got 2nd in Nevada....


40 posted on 01/22/2008 7:43:12 PM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson