Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Candidates Call for Severe Restrictions on Second Amendment Rights (video)
NRA ^ | 1/18/08 | unkown

Posted on 01/19/2008 9:04:28 AM PST by epow

Click the link on the heading to see and hear the video clip. If you watched the Las Vegas debate you saw what's on the video, but a lot of us didn't watch it so here's what the Democrat weasels had to say about what they will do concerning guns if elected. What they say they want to do is scary enough, but what I know they actually intend to do if elected is much worse. They all lie like a Persian rug, but they are so good at it they almost fool me and I know they're lying.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; candidates; guns; restrictions
Nothing new here, same old Democrat gungrabber lies and deceit. The candidates say they respect the 2nd Amendment, but then go on to say that they will work to pass a new assault weapon ban and push for gun registration and licensing, the very same type registration that made it possible for Hitler's thugs to confiscate guns from the German people. There is no valid reason to register guns except to learn who has them so they can be picked up when the authorities are ready to ban them.

If you watched the Las Vegas debate you saw what's on this clip, but I don't watch debates because they make me too angry watching the frauds lie and dance around their true intentions if elected. One of them used the tired old line that you don't need an AK47 to hunt with, and they all relate guns to hunting as if that's what the authors intended the 2nd Amendment to protect. What the authors really intended for the amendment to do was to protect us from would-be tyrants like these Democrats.

1 posted on 01/19/2008 9:04:31 AM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: epow
I don’t think I have ever heard a dimocRAT in recent times quote anything in the Constitution let alone the 2nd amendment.
2 posted on 01/19/2008 9:06:43 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

I didn’t know if a video clip would qualify as an article to be posted, but it seems to have gone through OK. The link is to an NRA website but the clip itself is taken from YouTube.


3 posted on 01/19/2008 9:09:08 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how the hardest working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

That’s because to a Democrat the Constitution is like what a cross is to a vampire.


4 posted on 01/19/2008 9:13:18 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how the hardest working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow

EXCELLENT!!! I thought they had learned their lesson about this. I’m glad to see that they did not.


5 posted on 01/19/2008 9:16:31 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

Basically, they said they would like to require gun licensing on a national scale, but they don’t think they could get it passed.


6 posted on 01/19/2008 9:22:40 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow

“What the authors really intended for the amendment to do was to protect us from would-be tyrants like these Democrats.”

Hear! Hear!


7 posted on 01/19/2008 10:15:53 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
Clinton: "Our police officers are starting to be gunned down...mostly due to assault weapons. We had them stopped for awhile, now they're out there again. I will get the AW ban reinstated."

Edwards: "I don't think you need an AK-47 to hunt, and when I'm President, I'll do everything I can to reinstate the AW ban."

At least Obama was truthful in saying that there are two different worlds of gun owners; the lawful, rural type and the murdering, gangbanging type. He wants to "reconcile" these two worlds. Hmm.

8 posted on 01/19/2008 10:52:36 AM PST by Sender (Feel like, I feel like a poke chop san'wich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender
He wants to "reconcile" these two worlds. Hmm.

To quote the poor innocent 325lb victim of eeevil Los Angeles police brutality, Ca-ca-can't we all j-jest get along?

9 posted on 01/19/2008 11:18:18 AM PST by epow (Isn't it odd how the hardest working people seem to get all the lucky breaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Clinton: "Our police officers are starting to be gunned down...mostly due to assault weapons. We had them stopped for awhile, now they're out there again. I will get the AW ban reinstated."

How brain dead do you have to be to believe this cr@p?

We had them stopped for awhile, now they're out there again.

This statement implies that the "Assault Weapon Ban" law caused all criminal use of said guns to completely cease while the law was in effect.

Bans have magical powers, you see, and while they are in effect the banned objects de-materialize and exist only in the 4th dimension. Once the ban expires, the previously banned objects re-materialize and then begin to unilaterally wreak havoc on law abiding citizens and police officers.

/heavy, cynical sarcasm

10 posted on 01/19/2008 12:15:49 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
It is ridiculous garbage. Even during the AW ban, people could still buy an AR-15 or similar rifle with no flash suppressor or bayonet lug. Millions of "assault rifles" were owned long before the ban. Gang bangers don't generally go into gun stores and buy rifles anyway; their weapon of choice is the 9mm pistol held sideways.

So cops are starting to be gunned down by assault rifles since the ban expired? Someone should press Hillary to provide statistics on this.

11 posted on 01/19/2008 1:09:39 PM PST by Sender (Feel like, I feel like a poke chop san'wich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Gang bangers don't generally go into gun stores and buy rifles anyway; their weapon of choice is the 9mm pistol held sideways.

:^)

12 posted on 01/19/2008 3:14:23 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: epow
you don't need an AK47 to hunt with

That depends on who what you're hunting.

13 posted on 01/19/2008 3:22:16 PM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

LOL, that is a great ad!


14 posted on 01/20/2008 8:00:35 AM PST by Sender (Feel like, I feel like a poke chop san'wich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: epow

I wonder if Mr. Obama would care to expound on what the difference between the rural and city types are. The rural type he talks about own a lot more guns than the city types and yet most of the killings and murders take place in the inner citys. What is the difference???

Oh, yeah. In many of those big cities such as New York and Chicago it is almost impossible for the law abiding to own guns. That’s the difference. The law abiding are disarmed through liberal policies that people like you have advanced.

Idiot Edwards, you know that AK-47 is a loaded word. The AKs that are sold are nothing like the ones that people see in the movies. They are semi auto only!! Same as many other rifles...

I liked the second part where they talked about Rove using scare tactics of 9/11 and protecting us. It must be scare tactics because no Islamo fascists are out there trying to kill as many Americans as possible. It’s all made up.

Of course when the dumbocrats try to scare seniors by telling them the bad old republicans are going to take away their social security, that’s not scare tactics. That could actually happen!!


15 posted on 01/20/2008 9:38:33 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender

WastedYears typing

***At least Obama was truthful in saying that there are two different worlds of gun owners; the lawful, rural type and the murdering, gangbanging type. He wants to “reconcile” these two worlds. Hmm.***

He means he’s going to lump law-abiding gun owners with the criminals, to make it easier, of course.


16 posted on 01/21/2008 10:01:42 PM PST by wiggen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson