Link to the opening statement.....
About a quarter of the way down the page.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1947527/posts?page=534#534
#
Thank you fanfan for the ping and starting this thread.
Unless we, the people of North America, stand up against these people, they will destroy us. It's just that simple.
His argument should be simple.
Muslims believe that their god is either so weak or incapable of defending itself, that they must do it.
But, then again, the commission believes that it is more powerful than their god, and more powerful than Muslims, so the commission must act in defense of the Muslim’s god.
So by setting itself up to be greater than their god, the commission commits a far greater offense against their god than a crude caricature of their god could ever do.
Will Muslims now demand the death of commissioners for saying that they are greater than Allah? Surely doing so is a terrible hate crime. That is, declaring ones self greater than god.
He has been Canucked by the PC overkill police liberals.
I’m not a Canadian, but it’s pretty obvious that these provincial (in more ways than one) Human Rights Commissions have got to go. The Conservative Party, now that it’s in power, should bite the bullet and start working on getting rid of them, before the Liberals get back into the driver’s seat.
I drew a cartoon of my own of Muhammad, depicting him carrying a sword, an ax, and a Koran, yelling “Kill the infidel!” with the caption “Will Muslims get offended if I draw Muhammad like THIS?”
A Look at More Than Cartoons
http://www.truthusa.com/MoreThanCartoons.html
###
###
Crossposting - Adding more links:
blog:
“Outrage of the Week: Canadian Publisher Persecuted for Mindcrime”
Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:31:36 pm PST
#
blog:
“Canada’s Star Chamber quizzes Ezra Levant over the Mohammed cartoons”
POSTED AT 4:46 PM ON JANUARY 12, 2008 BY ALLAHPUNDIT
#
blog:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/01/danish-cartoons.html
Saturday, January 12, 2008
“DANISH CARTOONS: FREE SPEECH ON TRIAL, AGAIN”
###
###
Off Topic:
blog:
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190731.php
January 11, 2008
“Political Asylum for UK Blogger Lionheart?”
BLOG ENTRY SNIPPET: “Yes, it’s come to this. Actual discussion about whether or not there is a case to be made that Lionheart, the British blogger who will be arrested upon his return to Bedfordshire for criticizing Islam, qualifies for political asylum in the United States.”
###
###
AGAIN, THIS IS OFF TOPIC:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019534.php
January 12, 2008
“The Implications of the Dismissal of Stephen Coughlin, Joint Staff, Pentagon”
Gotta have graphics to really get the meaning of the story.
Which is worse: leftists or islamicists? They’re cut from the same clothe.
John Galt speaks...
They should call it the Alberta Human Rights Theft Commission.
Mark Steyn says that these commissions have always found for the Plaintiff.
Hmmmm...and I THOUGHT Alberta was the CONSERVATIVE province....guess I was wrong.
I actually read the attached non-rebuttal rebuttal by "The Canadian Islamic Organization" attacking Marc Steyn's masterful Maclean's Magazine articles. This tome itemizes accurately Western fears about Islam and other than saying those fears are false, does nothing to rebut them, or show that Islam is a constructive force in society.
For example, the report states that "(i)t is submitted that Macleans’ publications vis-à-vis the Muslim community are: (1) promoting Islamophobia and fear of Muslims; (2) representing Muslims as violent people who are prone to engage in violence and are incapable of living peacefully in their host societies; (3) casting suspicion on Muslims at large as potential terrorists, extremists, and radicals; (4) representing the presence and growth of Muslims in Western societies as a threat to the Western values of democracy, freedom, and human rights; (5) Attempting to import a racist discourse and language into mainstream discourse in Canadian society; (6) Attacking multiculturalism and religious freedoms; (7) attacking laws that provide protection to identifiable communities from the type of discriminatory journalism that Macleans is engaging in; (8) condemning any and all efforts by politicians, law enforcement, media". The "report" does nothing to illustrate that any of this is not fully justified. If interested, you can peruse the attachment.
The "text" is only about 17 pages long. The rest are copies of the "offending" articles, annotated with footnotes. and other institutions to reach out to Muslim communities and to exercise sensitivity.
Purely Orwellian. Show trials for political “crimes.” If this sort of abuse is not quickly and clearly abolished, then Canada and Britain are lost.