To: steel_resolve
WHY?!? Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary. As Rush says independents = Democrats that are unhappy with their own party but still pull the D lever when their vote really counts.
10 posted on
01/10/2008 12:35:05 PM PST by
rocksblues
(Just enforce the law!)
To: rocksblues
Rush laid out a scenario that scared me for our nation today on his broadcast....the Huckabee/McCain alliance.
12 posted on
01/10/2008 12:38:04 PM PST by
mtnwmn
(mtnwmn)
To: rocksblues
Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary. Iowa does not. But even amoung self-professed "strong conservatives", Fred trails McCain, Huck and Romney. This shows that voters are buying the B.S. that these three are slinging. Fred neets to educate these people, FAST!
14 posted on
01/10/2008 12:39:23 PM PST by
Texas Federalist
(Taxes get so depressed when they hear Fred Thompson is in charge that they cut themselves.)
To: rocksblues
Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary.
So does Michigan. I think South Carolina does too. Ridiculous. The media spins the results of independent voters into a mandate for moderates, if you ask me.
To: rocksblues
We don’t allow independents to vote in our caucus or primary in Iowa. You must declare as Rep or Dem to vote.
However, you can declare that night - there is no registration deadline. Most switch and then switch back a couple of days later.
18 posted on
01/10/2008 12:43:28 PM PST by
Free Vulcan
(No prisoners. No mercy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson