Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Switchgrass Ethanol Yields Large Net Energy Gain (mentioned by Tony Snow)
Environment News Service ^ | 01/08/2008

Posted on 01/09/2008 10:43:39 AM PST by cogitator

LINCOLN, Nebraska, January 8, 2008 - (ENS) - Switchgrass grown for biofuel production produced five times more energy than needed to grow, harvest and process it into cellulosic ethanol, finds a large farm study by researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln published Monday.

The five year study also found greenhouse gas emissions from cellulosic ethanol made from switchgrass were 94 percent lower than estimated greenhouse gas emissions from gasoline production.

"This clearly demonstrates that switchgrass is not only energy efficient, but can be used in a renewable biofuel economy to reduce reliance of fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance rural economies," said principal researcher Ken Vogel, a U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service geneticist in the university's agronomy and horticulture department.

In a biorefinery, switchgrass biomass can be broken down into sugars including glucose and xylose that can be fermented into ethanol similar to corn. Grain from corn and other annual cereal grains, such as sorghum, are now primary sources for ethanol production in the U.S.

In the future, perennial crops, such as switchgrass, as well as crop residues and forestry biomass could be developed as major cellulosic ethanol sources that could potentially displace 30 percent of current U.S. petroleum consumption, Vogel said.

Technology to convert biomass into cellulosic ethanol is now at the development stage. Six small commercial scale biorefineries are being built with scale-up support from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Vogel's study involved switchgrass fields on farms in Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. It is the largest study to date examining the net energy output, greenhouse gas emissions, biomass yields, agricultural inputs and estimated cellulosic ethanol production from switchgrass grown and managed for biomass fuel.

The study took place on 10 fields of 15 to 20 acres each with four in Nebraska near Atkinson, Crofton, Lawrence and Douglas; four in South Dakota near Highmore, Bristol, Huron and Ethan; and two in North Dakota near Streeter and Munich.

Trials began in 2000 and 2001 and continued for five years. Farmers were paid for their work under contract with the university and documented all production operations, agricultural inputs and biomass yields. The researchers used this information to determine the net energy estimates.

Switchgrass grown in this study yielded 93 percent more biomass per acre and an estimated 93 percent more net energy yield than previously estimated in a study done elsewhere of planted prairies in Minnesota that received low agricultural inputs, Vogel said.

Less land will be needed for energy crops if higher yields can be obtained.

Researchers point out in the study that plant biomass remaining after ethanol production could be used to provide the energy needed for the distilling process and other power requirements of the biorefinery. This results in a high net energy value for ethanol produced from switchgrass.

By contrast, corn grain ethanol biorefineries must use natural gas or other sources of energy for the conversion process.

In this study, switchgrass managed as a bioenergy crop produced estimated ethanol yields per acre similar to those from corn grown in the same states and years based on statewide average grain yields.

But higher yields compared to corn can be expected in the future, said Vogel, who points out that corn grain conversion technology is mature, while cellulosic conversion efficiency technology is still developing.

Vogel said he does not expect switchgrass to replace corn or other crops on Class 1 farm land. He and his colleagues are developing the grass for use on marginal, highly erodible lands similar to that currently in the federal Conservation Reserve Program. All the fields in this study met the qualifying criteria for that program.

Researchers found that switchgrass grown on the marginal fields produced an average of 300 gallons of ethanol per acre compared to average ethanol yields of 350 gallons per acre for corn for the same three states.

The researchers point out that this was a baseline study. The switchgrass cultivars used in this study were developed for use in pastures. New higher yielding cultivars are under development for specific use in bioenergy production systems.

Switchgrass yields continue to improve, Vogel said. Recent yield trials of new experimental strains in the three states produced 50 percent higher yields than achieved in this study.

Switchgrass in this study employed UNL's best management practices for switchgrass, including no-till seeding, herbicides, weed control and adaptive cultivars.

Six cellulosic biorefineries that are being co-funded by the U.S. Department of Energy also are in the works across the United States. These plants are expected to produce more than 130 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year.

Researchers reported their findings in the current issue of "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences," online at: Abstract


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: agriculture; agw; energy; ethanol; fuel; switchgrass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Marginal, highly erodible lands -- sounds like my yard qualifies.

Tony Snow, filling in for Paul Harvey, mentioned this study on the show today.

Another similar article, in case some people react negatively to "Environment News Service":

Biofuel: Major Net Energy Gain From Switchgrass-based Ethanol

The stuff apparently has no problems growing:


1 posted on 01/09/2008 10:43:44 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator

hey...I played that course. Lost a lotta balls in there.


2 posted on 01/09/2008 10:46:19 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I would much rather turn grass into fuel than corn, i.e. FOOD.

Of course, we’ll have to figure out how to stop college kids from trying to smoke the stuff.


3 posted on 01/09/2008 10:46:46 AM PST by nhoward14 (Fred Thompson will get it DUN DUN in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Don't the recent ethanol laws require corn based ethanol? After all, this isn't about energy indepedence. It is about getting votes in the midwest.
4 posted on 01/09/2008 10:47:29 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

If you have seen one of these brush fires, there’s a lot of energy there...


5 posted on 01/09/2008 10:47:41 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
maybe at today artificial high price. The issue is to create “cheap” fuel and that it does not do.
6 posted on 01/09/2008 10:49:05 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I believe that switchgrass is also readily converted to butanol, which is much closer to gasoline, as far as potential energy goes, than ethanol.

Mark


7 posted on 01/09/2008 10:49:38 AM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Big Switchgrass!


8 posted on 01/09/2008 10:50:21 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

All fermentation for ethanol produces almost a pound of carbon dioxide (a supposed ‘greenhouse gas’) for every pound of ethanol.


9 posted on 01/09/2008 10:51:10 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

And giving ADM it’s kickback


10 posted on 01/09/2008 10:51:59 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

My husband teaches in an agricultural school and he has mentioned this is as a much better choice than corn.


11 posted on 01/09/2008 10:53:31 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

The thing that makes switchgrass so intriguing is the ability to produce the ethanol w/o large external energy inputs. The switchgrass byproducts (unlike corn) can be used as fuel instead of natgas for the conversion process. Also, a lot of marginal ground that’s not suitable for grain production can be used which includes the bulk of ag-ground in the US. Makes a lot more sense than corn based ethanol production.


12 posted on 01/09/2008 10:57:09 AM PST by bereanway (Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
All fermentation for ethanol produces almost a pound of carbon dioxide (a supposed ‘greenhouse gas’) for every pound of ethanol.

But that CO2 is derived from the carbon in the feedstock, which removed the CO2 from the atmosphere to grow (photosynthesis) in the first place. Thus, little net contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere from this process.

13 posted on 01/09/2008 10:57:45 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Renewable Energy PING?


14 posted on 01/09/2008 10:59:33 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I saw mention of co2 produced during fermentation, but It would be interesting to know how much oxygen is produced and co2 consumed by this stuff during it’s growth cycle.


15 posted on 01/09/2008 11:00:14 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio; qam1
You are both right, and add in MTBE. It is all about monopoly, subsidies and money.

Those factors must be removed and energy efficiency and market efficiency replace them.

16 posted on 01/09/2008 11:00:15 AM PST by Navy Patriot (The hyphen American with the loudest whine gets the grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Don't the recent ethanol laws require corn based ethanol?

No, they don't. The actually favor cellulosic ethanol by giving them extra credit in counting towards the total gallons required to be in our fuel system.

17 posted on 01/09/2008 11:00:27 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio; qam1

DING DING DING!


18 posted on 01/09/2008 11:02:01 AM PST by polymuser (Happy New Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

bttt


19 posted on 01/09/2008 11:04:24 AM PST by isaiah55version11_0 (For His Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
From the article:

"Technology to convert biomass into cellulosic ethanol is now at the development stage. Six small commercial scale biorefineries are being built with scale-up support from the U.S. Department of Energy."

It remains to be seen how practical this will be, but it seems to me this sort of work needs to be done. If it works, we should get lots of good out of it.

20 posted on 01/09/2008 11:11:10 AM PST by Cracker Jack (If it weren't for the democrats, republicans would be the worst thing in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson