[Telepathic Intruder]

If they can take “climate-change causing” CO2 out of the atmosphere to make fuel, doesn’t it just become CO2 again when it’s burned? So the net effect is zero, which is better I guess than taking it out of the ground. CO2 is a greenhouse gas , but a very mild one, and plants just consume excess CO2 anyway, resulting in more plants. Of course, Al Gore would beg to differ. His numerous degrees in climatology would tell him that CO2 is likely to drown more trees as ocean levels rise than anything else.

[CutePuppy]

When technology is ready, Al Gore is likely to take credit with "By suggesting constant recycling of CO2 from atmosphere to make fuel, I took part in creating the inexhaustible supply of energy and invented perpetuum mobile".

[SunkenCiv]

You rang the bell when you swung the hammer. :’)