Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sheila Kuehl is a Democratic state senator from Santa Monica. She authored SB 777, which was signed into law and is set to take effect next month.
1 posted on 01/04/2008 9:28:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Bio

Sheila James Kuehl was elected to the State Senate in 2000 and again in 2004 after serving for six years in the State Assembly. During the 1997-98 legislative session, she was the first woman in California history to be named Speaker pro Tempore of the Assembly. She is also the first openly gay or lesbian person to be elected to the California Legislature. A former pioneering civil rights attorney and law professor, Sen. Kuehl represents the 23rd Senate District in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. She is the chair of the Senate Health Committee and sits on the Agriculture, Appropriations, Environmental Quality, Joint Rules, Judiciary, Labor and Employment, and Natural Resources and Water Committees. Ms. Kuehl is also chair of the Select Committee on School Safety and Chair of the Select Committee on the Health Effects of Radioactive and Chemical Contamination. Senator Kuehl served as chair of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee from 2000-2006.

In her thirteen years in the State Legislature, Sen. Kuehl has authored 171 bills that have been signed into law, including legislation to establish paid family leave, establish the rights contained in Roe vs. Wade in California statute, overhaul California’s child support services system; establish nurse to patient ratios in every hospital; require that housing developments of more than 500 units have identified sources of water; further protect domestic violence victims and their children; prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender and disability in the workplace and sexual orientation in education; increase the rights of crime victims; safeguard the environment and drinking water; many, many others. Since 2003, she has led the fight in the legislature to achieve true universal health care in California, and, in 2006, brought SB 840, the California Universal Healthcare Act, to the Governor’s desk, the first time in U.S. history a single-payer healthcare bill had gone so far. Undaunted by its veto, Senator Kuehl continues to work to bring universal, affordable, quality health care to all Californians.

She was selected to address the 1996 Democratic National Convention on the issue of family violence and the 2000 Democratic National Convention on the issue of diversity. In 1996, George magazine selected her as one of the 20 most fascinating women in politics and the California Journal named her “Rookie of the Year.” In 1998 and, again, in 2000, the California Journal chose her as the Assembly member with the greatest intelligence and the most integrity. In 2006, the Capitol Weekly picked her as the most intelligent member of the California Legislature.

Prior to her election to the Legislature, Senator Kuehl drafted and fought to get into California law more than 40 pieces of legislation relating to children, families, women, and domestic violence. She was a law professor at Loyola, UCLA and USC Law Schools and co-founded and served as managing attorney of the California Women’s Law Center.

Senator Kuehl graduated from Harvard Law School in 1978 where she was the second woman in the school’s history to win the Moot Court competition. She served on the Harvard University Board of Overseers from 1998 to 2005.

In her youth, she was known for her portrayal of the irrepressible Zelda Gilroy in the television series, “The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis.”


2 posted on 01/04/2008 9:29:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
So at the nut of the argument is that SB 777 actually is nothing more than a reference list of existing law and that nothing is changed. So a legislator is making the argument that rather than make an easy to use reference list for educators and parents, a new law is taking it’s place to put it all into one place.

So why the wasted time and effort on making this into a law, rather than a handout for the state Department of Education? Just makework for a publicly paid servant?

So on the one hand, we have the argument that Sheila Kuehl wasted everyone’s time and energy with a bill that means nothing, and on the other hand, we have people claiming it changes vast portions of the law to discriminate against heterosexuals and to make it easier to convert more to homosexuality.

Seems like it’s in the interest of /both/ sides to repeal this useless piece of legislation to calm the fears of those who oppose it, and to remove a duplicative section of California code that didn’t need to be there in the first place.

There, problem solved.

5 posted on 01/04/2008 9:41:45 PM PST by kingu (Fred08 - The Constitution is the value I'm voting for. What value are you voting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Yeah, some people are more equal than others.


6 posted on 01/04/2008 9:43:44 PM PST by chaos_5 (Fred & Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

“When society tells a young person —— in subtle or, often, not so subtle, ways —— that they are less valuable, perhaps because of the color of their skin, their religious practices or the gender of the person they want to take to the prom, the whole society suffers.”

Of all the arguments I’ve heard against homosexuality, I have NEVER hear anyone say the person is less valuable. Such crap from this nutso woman.


7 posted on 01/04/2008 9:44:55 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
While SB777 might not make it illegal to use words like "mom" and "dad," I would imagine that attempting to inform confused students of the myriad health and emotional risks that go along with homosexual/lesbian lifestyles would not be permitted nor encouraged.

I refuse to follow it.

8 posted on 01/04/2008 9:58:30 PM PST by Othniel (Mohammad: False Prophet and Smeghead Deluxe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
SB 777?

Looking at that fugly-socialist-lesbo, I would say the bill should be renumbered SM 666.

13 posted on 01/04/2008 10:41:17 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Sheila Kuehl is the poster child for everything that is deeply wrong with California politics.


14 posted on 01/04/2008 11:08:15 PM PST by feralcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
When we mandate that every young person must go to school, we must also provide the safety and dignity of an education free from harassment, discrimination and violence.

The Sheila Kuehl to-do-list (for next Monday):

1. Ban dodgeball in schools.

2. Modify the sexist term "history" with the benign "theirtory".

3. Force the Governor to change his offensive last name ("Schwarzenegger" ends with letters that may be interpreted as a racist slur against sensitive disadvantaged minority pupils). His new name: "Arnold Magic Puffball".

15 posted on 01/04/2008 11:40:37 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
We know what Christian parents should do. They should immediately remove their children from government schools!

So?,,,, What should *** Christian teachers*** do about this? As I see it, there are only 2 ethical options:

1) They can get themselves fired. How? They can reject, oppose, protest, and refuse to cooperate with this law and any government education program that undermines the Judeo Christian principles upon which all freedom rests.

2) Quit.

They do have a third option that is not ethical.

Christian teachers can aid, abet, and cooperate with the Marxists and their Useful Idiots in our government schools that are working to turn children against Judeo Christian principles and that is determined to destroy Western Civilization and freedom.

So?....What do the students learn if they see Christian teachers helping push forward an anti-Judeo Christian worldview?

Answer: Students learn that Christians are hypocrites. Possibly they learn that Christians are lukewarm in their beliefs, are good fence sitters, or that a pension and paycheck are more important to Christians than principles.

I have read posters here on Free Republic suggest that teachers cooperate with the anti-Judeo Christian worldview, but tell their students they don’t believe but have to teach it anyway.

Students surely know that no gun is being held to the head of any teacher, so, what do students learn with this approach? Answer: They learn that Christian teachers KNOW the truth but will teach them lies anyway.

Some have suggested that Christian teachers can sneak in a little “Salt and Light” and possibly be a good example for Christianity. Really? So? When was being sly and sneaky being a good example?

Some have posted that some Christian teachers really need their paycheck and, ( my goodness!) where would they find another job?

What lesson are they teaching their students? Answer: That Christians are people that have little faith in God’s providence and that Christians are too stupid to adapt to the free marketplace.

Example is NOT the best teacher. It is the ONLY teacher! What example are these Christian teachers setting?

Will the job of true missionaries for Christ be easier, when these kids finally reach adulthood, or harder?

What is a true missionary for Christ to do with a person who believes that their Christian teachers were weak, lukewarm, fence sitting, stupid, timid, greedy for a paycheck, people of little faith in God’s providence, unable too incompetent to work in the free market, and liars! Will their job be easier or harder? Answer: Harder!

With the passage of 777. Conditions are now so bad in the government schools that trying to be an influence for good is like aiming a water pistol at a raging forest fire. Give it up! It is time to get out! Staying does more harm than good.

Get out! And,,,Then start working to close these government school cesspools down. Work to start a viable system of education within your own churches.

***Your own children and the children of your congregation are your most important mission field!***

Once you have a smoothly running church education system in your own school, then invite non-members ( provided it does not overwhelm the Christian culture of the school). Mentor and love the parents of these children. Teach them to be good parents.

Finally, get away from the outdated idea that a school needs to be brick and mortar. Instead, think in terms of homeschools, micro-schools, and one room school houses. With today’s technology it is possible to have excellent schools at very little cost. Also... Build a system of Christian athlete leagues to break the monopoly that the government and it schools has on sports.

I read recently in the Wall Street Journal that Harvard has a 35 BILLION dollar endowment. Isn’t it time that Christians started private scholarship foundation to give private scholarships to private Christian schools? We are a wealthy nation. It really is possible for every child in the U.S. to have a free Christian education. (possibly even every child in the world) Christian could do this if they wanted.

18 posted on 01/05/2008 2:51:38 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson