[kingu]

So at the nut of the argument is that SB 777 actually is nothing more than a reference list of existing law and that nothing is changed. So a legislator is making the argument that rather than make an easy to use reference list for educators and parents, a new law is taking it’s place to put it all into one place.

So why the wasted time and effort on making this into a law, rather than a handout for the state Department of Education? Just makework for a publicly paid servant?

So on the one hand, we have the argument that Sheila Kuehl wasted everyone’s time and energy with a bill that means nothing, and on the other hand, we have people claiming it changes vast portions of the law to discriminate against heterosexuals and to make it easier to convert more to homosexuality.

Seems like it’s in the interest of /both/ sides to repeal this useless piece of legislation to calm the fears of those who oppose it, and to remove a duplicative section of California code that didn’t need to be there in the first place.

There, problem solved.

[calex59]

So on the one hand, we have the argument that Sheila Kuehl wasted everyone’s time and energy with a bill that means nothing, and on the other hand, we have people claiming it changes vast portions of the law to discriminate against heterosexuals and to make it easier to convert more to homosexuality.

Since this woman is a known homosexual I would bet the farm that it is meant to promote homosexuality. Read the real bill, it tells you all you need to know