Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2008 5:08:34 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

Who doesn’t want to work with a hottie? The dumber the better.


2 posted on 01/03/2008 5:09:56 PM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

next thing you know they will produce a study showing that more attractive people are found to be more attractive.


3 posted on 01/03/2008 5:10:08 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This article has merit — I get showered with job offers.


4 posted on 01/03/2008 5:11:27 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

DUHHHH!


5 posted on 01/03/2008 5:13:12 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I was once a part owner of a commercial financial services business. I had to hire a lawyer to report directly to me. One day this female applicant showed up who was so breathtakingly drop dead beautiful that I couldn’t even concentrate on the interview.

I didn’t hire her, because I knew I would never get any work done with her around.


8 posted on 01/03/2008 5:17:00 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
There was a highly significant increase in the anticipatory EDR when the male interviewers assigned the low status job packages to the attractive female candidates. The fact that this difference only occurred when assigning low status job packages ensures that the effect could not have been driven by interpersonal attraction, but rather by emotion.

So could one infer that men handing out low status packages to attractive women were anticipating opportunities to help them, er, better their status? Or just having fun setting them in their place?

10 posted on 01/03/2008 5:20:38 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
This explains why I work for myself...I'm ugly and have a bad attitude.
11 posted on 01/03/2008 5:22:33 PM PST by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

In other breaking news, water is found to be wet.


13 posted on 01/03/2008 5:31:37 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

What??? No photos???


15 posted on 01/03/2008 5:34:16 PM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Brains, beauty and abilty just are not enough. Integrity of character is the most important trait. http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23001223-952,00.html?from=mostpop

I get a kick out of these studies. They are a lot of hogwash and simply a way to employ researchers who have in this case, failed to address the important measure of character.

Of course its nice if beauty and ability are also present, hotties with character are the best!

17 posted on 01/03/2008 5:38:54 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Brains, beauty and abilty just are not enough. Integrity of character is the most important trait.

I mean , look at what happened to Ms. Pima County of Arizona, Kumari Fulbright. She is a law student, national beauty contestant, and is now facing a 5 count felony conviction for kidnapping

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23001223-952,00.html?from=mostpop

I get a kick out of these studies. They are a lot of hogwash and simply a way to employ researchers who have in this case, failed to address the important measure of character.

Of course its nice if beauty and ability are also present, hotties with character are the best!

18 posted on 01/03/2008 5:39:47 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I've suspected this for a long time, I've also suspected that many companies in the USA hurt themselves by trying to save money by having a lot of female personal in management when in the long run they end up with a bunch of dumb studs and dumb blonds. I've also suspect this also might be the reason why many companies are moving their business out of the USA not because of costs but to reestablish a more male management with out being sued up the ying yang.
19 posted on 01/03/2008 5:41:47 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I don’t find this true at the place where I work; quite the contrary. Bottom line, I ask, what would be wrong with hiring the average hottie vs hiring the average skag?


20 posted on 01/03/2008 5:45:10 PM PST by Migraine (...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
How did she get her job??
21 posted on 01/03/2008 5:45:10 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Who the hell wants to work around a bunch of ugly people?


22 posted on 01/03/2008 5:45:45 PM PST by kempo (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I must admit it was a factor in me being hired several times.


27 posted on 01/03/2008 6:03:32 PM PST by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“Hiring Practices Influenced By Beauty”

Most Freepers must be hitting those Iowa primary/caucuses threads
really, really hard tonight.

That’s about the best explanation I can think of for there not being a
“Captain Obvious” or “Master Of The Obvious” graphic on this thread yet!!!


34 posted on 01/03/2008 6:37:06 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I guess that’s why Hillary came in 3rd.


41 posted on 01/03/2008 7:39:42 PM PST by fungoking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
A new study finds that the attractiveness of interviewees can significantly bias outcome in hiring practices

New? This is a study that's done at least once a year -- and the results are always the same.

42 posted on 01/03/2008 8:21:22 PM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Photobucket
43 posted on 01/03/2008 8:55:10 PM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson