So, we have nothing to worry about: 1) Iran signed some agreements. 2) The UN has demanded repeatedly. 3) Russia assures us. 4) The UN Security Council opposes sanctions. 5) And the same intelligence that told Clinton and Bush there were WMDs in Iraq, and who told us Iran was building nuclear arms, is now telling us they quit that 4 years ago.
What is our problem?
1 posted on
12/23/2007 8:52:04 AM PST by
DBCJR
To: DBCJR
The announced date is in three months.Therefore Israel will assume that it will be operational next month and,therefore,the bombing will take place within the next couple of weeks.
2 posted on
12/23/2007 8:54:04 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: DBCJR
What is our problem? Believing any of this!
3 posted on
12/23/2007 8:55:42 AM PST by
melancholy
(Beware of Ho Chi Minh's offspring, Ho She Marx , invading the WH.)
To: DBCJR
It’ll open one day and be closed for repairs the next.
4 posted on
12/23/2007 8:56:31 AM PST by
wastedyears
("I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: DBCJR
It’s not that Iran wants to build Nuke weapons.
It’s that they have stated they will do anything to see us dead, and they want to build nuke weapons.
That is why we do, and should, oppose it.
5 posted on
12/23/2007 8:59:17 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Just saying what 'they' won't.)
To: DBCJR
What is our problem?In my opinion creating civilian and therefore civil service based intelligence agencies has not helped the situation.
6 posted on
12/23/2007 8:59:17 AM PST by
rhombus
To: DBCJR
Russia says its fuel can only be used at and for the Bushehr plant.
Which in the future will be known by its new name, Rubble.
8 posted on
12/23/2007 9:05:34 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: DBCJR
Ready by March? OK, let’s drop a bomb February 11—make the 29th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution a blast.
10 posted on
12/23/2007 9:11:43 AM PST by
G8 Diplomat
(Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
To: DBCJR
To: DBCJR
One if by land, two if by sea?
To: DBCJR
I recall reading on FR that this plant is built on or very near an active fault line.
14 posted on
12/23/2007 9:19:18 AM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: DBCJR
To: DBCJR
Is the Mexico-Canada-Siberia trade corridor conspiracy, the CFR Global Conspiracy, the Global Warming Conspiracy, the Bilderburger Conspiracy, and the Alcohol Fuel Conspiracy not enough we have to have an Iranian Nuke Power Plant Conspiracy too?
17 posted on
12/23/2007 9:48:01 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
To: DBCJR
Russia says its fuel can only be used at and for the Bushehr plant. Whew, what a relief. I know I trust the Russians the Iranians and the MSM.
19 posted on
12/23/2007 9:48:36 AM PST by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: DBCJR
"The Bushehr plant will produce isotopes for irradiating baby milk. The preposterous speculation about nuclear weapons is a Zionist lie"
25 posted on
12/23/2007 10:52:25 AM PST by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Global warming is the new Marxism.)
To: All
The irony of it all!
The name of the plant is BUSHehr.
32 posted on
12/23/2007 10:08:08 PM PST by
OnRightOnLeftCoast
(Not to be confused with similar-name pirate RightOnLeftCoast)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
