[GodGunsGuts]

==It is not your view that they are incorrectly interpreting their results, but that they are engaged in fraud and conspiracy.

You are very mistaken. I do think the HIV-AIDS hypothesis is based on fraud, but the vast majority of scientists have no clue and just accept the fraud on authority without asking questions. You fall in that category IMHO.

PS First you agree to debate, then you back out. Hmmmmm.....

[allmendream]

Sorry but the research on HIV and AIDS has progressed to the point that the Scientists working on it are either correct in their assumption or engaged in fraud on a massive scale. Not the Scientists like me who work in unrelated fields and accept their conclusions, I mean the actual Scientists working on the HIV virus. There is no possibility that they are just mistaken at this point, they are either essentially correct, or engaged in massive fraud.

I am not interested in debating a conspiracy theorist. I am perfectly willing to discuss Science, and debate the implications and meanings of the data. But if you think they are ‘Liars Liars Pants on Fire’ right from the beginning, while your granola eating anti-corporate raw foodist coffee enema having nutters are obviously truth-tellers of the highest order.

If you have data present it and I will engage it. Otherwise it is YOU who first backed down from defending the ASININE and IDIOTIC article at the head of this thread that cannot even keep translation and transcription differentiated to chase a red herring of HIV AIDS which has nothing to do with the subject.