Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Gun Free Zones Create A Legal Liability?
Captain's Quarters ^ | Dec. 10, 2007 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/10/2007 7:49:56 AM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Sender
It also exempts LEO active and retired, judges, magistrates etc from these restrictions.

Whither "equal protection?"

61 posted on 12/10/2007 10:38:23 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: archy

I think you just won the argument.


62 posted on 12/10/2007 10:40:14 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Sorry, but the premise was yours, when you asked:
“For instance, can a sign deny the right to free speech?”
And I disagree with most of what you write above anyway. I think you are wrong in just about every respect.


Incorrect, you built a strawman argument. The distinction is when you used a home in your argument vice a place of business. Both are personal property, but only one is considered public.
You may disagree with 'most' of what I write, but that does not change the facts that places of business are considered public with respect to law.
63 posted on 12/10/2007 10:46:01 AM PST by rjsimmon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

penalties does one face for carrying in a business marked “no guns”?

Loss of permit and lots of felony charges.


Please don’t give ignorant legal advice. What you say is untrue in many or most states.


64 posted on 12/10/2007 10:49:36 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

You make lots of claims, but don’t support them.

Please quote my statements you are referring to, and I will address your arguments, which are presently incomprehensible.


65 posted on 12/10/2007 10:51:30 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

You in big trouble if you have a permit and ignore the ruloes.


66 posted on 12/10/2007 10:51:59 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

You in big trouble if you have a permit and ignore the ruloes.


Perhaps, but you don’t seem very well acquainted with the rules.


67 posted on 12/10/2007 10:53:34 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
You make lots of claims, but don’t support them.

You accuse me of making lots of unsupported claims, yet in your previous post, you do the exact same.
68 posted on 12/10/2007 10:55:34 AM PST by rjsimmon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Guess again.


69 posted on 12/10/2007 10:56:38 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Beelzebubba
States handle the CCW issue differently, Rightwhale.

Where you live, it may very well be a felony charge to carry where signs are posted against it.

Where Beelzebubba and I live in Nevada, a sign in a public place means nothing. The sign might as well say 'Support the United Negro College Fund' for all the force or effect it holds.

70 posted on 12/10/2007 11:00:42 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
penalties does one face for carrying in a business marked “no guns”?

Loss of permit and lots of felony charges.

That's not true in the state in which the poster to whom you responded resides.

71 posted on 12/10/2007 11:04:27 AM PST by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Of course. The handgun permits were initiated in the first place to combat the gun grabbing platform of the Liberals in 1994.


72 posted on 12/10/2007 11:04:27 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

It’s true here, which rebuts the entire argument.


73 posted on 12/10/2007 11:05:37 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
penalties does one face for carrying in a business marked “no guns”?

Loss of permit and lots of felony charges.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please don’t give ignorant legal advice. What you say is untrue in many or most states.

From Texas Department of Public safety
Crime Records Service
Concealed Handgun Licensing Section
Frequently Asked Questions about Texas Concealed Handguns

Q: Do private property owners have the right to exclude license holders from their property?

A: Yes. Private property owners may give notice excluding license holders from carrying concealed handguns. If you carry a concealed handgun on posted property, you can be charged with criminal trespass by a license holder. The charge is a Class A misdemeanor, and if you are convicted, your license will be revoked.

74 posted on 12/10/2007 11:12:39 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“Here?”


75 posted on 12/10/2007 11:14:10 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

Congratulations! You are 2% of the way there!

(BTW, has there EVER been a case where someone has been charged or revoked under that law for doing nothing more than carrying into private property where it would have been legal except for a sign prohibiting it?)


76 posted on 12/10/2007 11:16:01 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

For the geniuses here who are simply looking to bicker, I will repeat and stand by my complete statement in post 42:

“In many states, there is no criminal penalty (for violating a private carry ban sign). If would fall into the same legal category as “no dogs” or “shirts required.” The owner has the right to eject you, and if you refuse, your are trespassing and subject to arrest.

“But check your state, because some states surely make it a crime to violate a proper gun-ban sign on private property.”


77 posted on 12/10/2007 11:18:22 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

No, it rebuts what the argument would have been if someone who carries in your state had asked you. The correct answer for the person who asked the question is that there is no penalty for carrying into a place that posts a sign prohibiting it, as long as it is otherwise legal to carry in that place, and assuming you would leave if you were asked to do so.

State gun laws vary so widely that an answer pertaining to a given state is almost certain to be untrue in another state. It’s unwise to give a blanket answer unless you specify the state(s) to which your answer applies, or you are sure that your answer is right for the state about which the question is posed.


78 posted on 12/10/2007 11:22:43 AM PST by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dread78645

How does a magnotometer distinguish between the minial metal in my glock and someone eles’s car keys?


79 posted on 12/10/2007 11:29:02 AM PST by Bear_Slayer (When liberty is outlawed only outlaws will have liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

The point is don’t assume that because the signs mean nothing in your state that the signs mean nothing “most states”. You could end up with a criminal record and be barred by federal law from owning a hand gun.

Yes, there are also cases where people lost their permit because the gun wasn’t Concealed enough. Texas law says its presence can’t be “discernible through ordinary observation”.

About two or three times a year some anti-human-rights nut hits a permit holder with this. There was a case about 4 years ago where an exwife flagged down a cop and told him she saw a man in the store who had a gun under his jacket. Her exhusband lost his permit.


80 posted on 12/10/2007 11:34:02 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson