Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly Discovered Methane-Consuming Bacterium Could Help Reduce GHG Emissions ...
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 11/26/2007 | Staff

Posted on 11/26/2007 1:18:22 PM PST by Red Badger

An international team of researchers has discovered a methane-consuming microorganism that lives in extremely acidic conditions. The bacterium could one day be used to reduce methane gas emissions from landfills. It could also help to cut methane emissions from geothermal power stations.

Aerobic methanotrophic bacteria (methanotrophs) consume methane diffusing away from methane-producing zones of soil and sediment. Some environments with active methane cycles—such as marshes and peat bogs—are very acidic; however, no cultured methanotroph grows optimally below pH 5. By contrast, the new bacterium is extremely acidophilic, and grows optimally at pH 2.0-2.5.

Unlike known methanotrophs, which belong to the phylum Proteobacteria, the new bacterium belongs to Verrucomicrobia. A paper on the new organism is published in the journal Nature.

Analysis of its draft genome detected genes encoding particulate methane monooxygenase that were homologous to genes found in methanotrophic proteobacteria. However, known genetic modules for methanol and formaldehyde oxidation were incomplete or missing, suggesting that the bacterium uses some novel methylotrophic pathways. Phylogenetic analysis of its three pmoA genes (encoding a subunit of particulate methane monooxygenase) placed them into a distinct cluster from proteobacterial homologues. This indicates an ancient divergence of Verrucomicrobia and Proteobacteria methanotrophs rather than a recent horizontal gene transfer of methanotrophic ability. The findings show that methanotrophy in the Bacteria is more taxonomically, ecologically and genetically diverse than previously thought, and that previous studies have failed to assess the full diversity of methanotrophs in acidic environments.

Globally, acidic environments generate significant quantities of methane. Scientists had suspected that a proportion of the methane generated by these sources was being consumed by bacteria living in the environments.

Our discovery has demonstrated that methane-consuming organisms do live in highly acidic environments. Without them, the amount of methane entering the atmosphere would be much greater. Ultimately, it may be possible to implant this organism, or a similar one, in landfills and cut methane emissions into the atmosphere. —Matthew Stott, GNS Science

The researchers found the microorganism living in the Hell’s Gate geothermal areas in Rotorua, New Zealand. GNS Science microbiologist Peter Dunfield, who isolated the bacterium, has tentatively named it Methylokorus infernorum, which is a latinized description of its methane food source, the ‘hellish’ location of its discovery, and also a description of a structure within its cell that resembles a Koru.

GNS Science worked with colleagues at the University of Hawaii to sequence the genome of the bacterium.

The discovery stems from a collaboration between GNS Science and the owner and operator of Hell’s Gate, Tikitere Trust. The agreement between the two organizations includes the sharing of any benefits that might accrue from scientific discoveries.

Resources

*

Peter F. Dunfield et. al., “Methane oxidation by an extremely acidophilic bacterium of the phylum Verrucomicrobia” Nature advance online publication 14 November 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature06411


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: bs; darklife; energy; ghg; gw; methane; opec; petroleum; powerfromtheearth; thomasgold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^0
1 posted on 11/26/2007 1:18:25 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^0

Obviously, a massive government program is needed to develop this, funded by an initial grant of $100 billion.

2 posted on 11/26/2007 1:21:20 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

The search could take decades........


3 posted on 11/26/2007 1:22:29 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Great! Now all we have to do is find something that eats CO2, sequesters the carbon and releases the oxygen!.............;^

I think that I will never see a bacterium as lovely as a tree . . .

I'm picturing an Andromeda Strain situation; a bacteria gone wild that eats the world starting from the various methane producing buttocks of mammals and working it's way inside . . .

4 posted on 11/26/2007 1:24:26 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not find, build.


5 posted on 11/26/2007 1:25:30 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Oh, yes, the pork projects could be endless...............


6 posted on 11/26/2007 1:28:02 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I want one which 'eats' CO2 and emits CH4.

Under controlled conditions, it would revolutionize natural gas production (think energy, folks--these critters they are ballyhooing will eat it).

7 posted on 11/26/2007 1:28:42 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The search could take decades........

Only studying tree rings will tell how long!

8 posted on 11/26/2007 1:28:42 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If it eats methane, what does it fart?


9 posted on 11/26/2007 1:28:47 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
If it eats methane, what does it fart?

Crisp mountain air.

10 posted on 11/26/2007 1:29:51 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I just reduce my acidic methane producing environment with a Tums.


11 posted on 11/26/2007 1:29:57 PM PST by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I almost choked on my coffee.......


12 posted on 11/26/2007 1:30:16 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
We have a couple of closed land fills that trap the methane and use it to provide energy to homes in the area, at a reduced rate.

Here's a stat on one of them:

"• The Greene Valley Forest Preserve gas-to-energy facility extracted 1,606,439,126 cubic feet of methane gas fromthe landfill, which generated 62,041,313 kilowatt hours for the purchaser and $317,233 in revenue for the District."

I wonder how much methane eating microbes would cut into this..
13 posted on 11/26/2007 1:30:54 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
I wonder how much methane eating microbes would cut into this.

I wonder what happens when this critter gets loose in our natural gas supply!

14 posted on 11/26/2007 1:33:17 PM PST by Species8472 (Politically motivated science is meaningless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_bacteria


15 posted on 11/26/2007 1:34:14 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why destroy the methane when it can be used?

http://www.aircycle.com/articles/landfill/


16 posted on 11/26/2007 1:36:16 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yup. Seems far easier, especially with the new Stirling engine-based generators/cogen sets coming on-line.

Plus methanotrophs require oxygen to be pumped down to them if one is trying to remediate a landfill - not a cheap or simple task.


17 posted on 11/26/2007 1:38:47 PM PST by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
GHG Emissions?

Gastrointestinal Heinie Gas Emissions, perhaps?

18 posted on 11/26/2007 1:40:21 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This is bunk. Methane is natural gas. The most ecologically efficient way of getting rid of methane is to burn it. This does yield CO2, but methane is twenty times as powerful a greenhouse gas than plain old CO2, so why not make use of its energy potential as heat while you’re at it?
19 posted on 11/26/2007 1:48:51 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I thought methane was tapped at garbage dumps to generate electricity. Isn’t this a little counterproductive?


20 posted on 11/26/2007 1:53:10 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson